Mike Schilli wrote:
>> I added a new test script for this behaviour and a possible
patch to
>> Synchronized (Log4perl version 1.21).
>
>Looks good, I've applied it to the git repo (we're in the process of
>migrating to github).
Great! Altough my changes were tiny, it still feels good to colla
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Mike Schilli wrote:
> which is most certainly terrible and, as mentioned above, needs to be
> fixed in one of the upcoming Log4perl releases.
Okay, I've cleaned it up a bit and added some documentation on how to
initialize composite appenders with the API:
http://github.
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Jens Berthold wrote:
> 1) The sub Log::Log4perl::Appender::Synchronized->post_init() is not
> called when the appender is created via API. Is this correct? My way
> to handle this was to write an own class derived from Synchronized an
> copy the code from post_init() to new()
Hi,
I am new to this list and hope this is the right place for my questions.
I am using Log4perl in a server project with parent and child processes.
And it's great, of course ;-)
Due to an initialization of log4perl that has multiple steps I recently
switched from text based initialization to
