On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Berg, Eric wrote:
> The answer was that that information isn't kept. For one thing, it
> could be that the configuration was derived or modified
> programatically.
That's not accurate. Of course it's kept, otherwise the file
appender wouldn't know what the name of the file i
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Berg, Eric wrote:
> Well, that's good news, Mike, but what about the following did I not
> understand?
The mail below referred to the configuration file name, while the
previous mail referred to the output file name the file appender uses.
Two entirely different animals! :)
