Re: Sense of LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory

2009-05-24 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, i just found: "* Logger Factories * * The usage of custom logger factories is discouraged and no longer * documented." in the LoggerConfiguratorIni.php. Since it looks as already discussed, I will remove the LoggerFactory stuff as proposed, if noone shouts.

Re: Sense of LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory

2009-05-23 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, again, I know understand much more bout Hierarchy etc.. However, I would like to remove that Factory stuff. It makes everything more complex as necessary and even when I know that people can have their own Logger Implementations with this approach, I doubt that people will use it in PHP. But I

Re: Sense of LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory

2009-05-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> Be aware that this is currently used in > LoggerHierarchy::getLoggerByFactory(). yes, but this could be refactored i think. Maybe simple in getLogger()

Re: Sense of LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory

2009-05-07 Thread Knut Urdalen
Christian Grobmeier wrote: whats going on with those classes? LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory LoggeFactory Be aware that this is currently used in LoggerHierarchy::getLoggerByFactory(). Knut

Sense of LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory

2009-05-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi, whats going on with those classes? LoggerDefaultCategoryFactory LoggeFactory Do we really need a abstract factory and and a concrete implementatio of that just for the one line: public function makeNewLoggerInstance($name) { return new Logger($name); } This looks st