Re: [Logcheck-devel] Requesting clarification on a few things

2011-07-08 Thread Jeremy L. Gaddis
martin f krafft madd...@debian.org wrote: also sprach Jeremy L. Gaddis jlgad...@gnu.org [2011.07.08.0624 +0200]: One thing that Hannes mentioned was in response to commits 5f7da05[1] and cf5e9d3[2] which I made to address bug #590559[3]. As he mentioned in his email, webmin was removed from

Re: [Logcheck-devel] Requesting clarification on a few things

2011-07-08 Thread Hannes von Haugwitz
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote: One thing that Hannes mentioned was in response to commits 5f7da05[1] and cf5e9d3[2] which I made to address bug #590559[3]. As he mentioned in his email, webmin was removed from the Debian archive over five years ago[4]. He

[Logcheck-devel] Templating (was: Requesting clarification on a few things)

2011-07-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jeremy L. Gaddis jlgad...@gnu.org [2011.07.08.1133 +0200]: Rather than hacking the regexps, this should really be done by finally introducing macros/templates/patterns into rulefiles. From what I gathered (either from the archives or the wiki, I forget which), it seems that

[Logcheck-devel] Bug#623298: marked as done (logcheck: excessive CPU use by egrep)

2011-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:46:49 +0200 with message-id 20110708134649.ga5...@carbon.vonhaugwitz.com and subject line Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#623298: Acknowledgement (logcheck: excessive CPU use by egrep) has caused the Debian Bug report #623298, regarding logcheck: excessive CPU use