Re: [Logcheck-devel] smart attribute messages

2006-09-09 Thread Elmar Hoffmann
Hi, on Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 15:35:19 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Elmar Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.08.1531 +0200]: Maybe a broader /dev/[[:alpha:]]+ in the rules won't hurt? Might just as well make it /dev/[^[:space:]]+ IMHO Yeah, all together this would be replacing

Re: [Logcheck-devel] smart attribute messages

2006-09-08 Thread Elmar Hoffmann
Hi, on Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 15:14:16 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: While we're on the topic: Sep 6 14:29:18 piper smartd[5287]: Device: /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-SATA_Maxtor_7Y250M0_Y63XCJRE, SMART Prefailure Attribute: 8 Seek_Time_Performance changed from 245 to 244 I started using

Re: [Logcheck-devel] smart attribute messages

2006-09-08 Thread Elmar Hoffmann
Hi, on Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 17:00:03 +0200, martin f krafft wrote: also sprach Elmar Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.09.04.1645 +0200]: So I do think that it is a good thing to receive these. Fair enough. I think I did commit rules to ignore them, however, so these need to be undone.

[Logcheck-devel] smart attribute messages

2006-07-05 Thread martin f krafft
Can we please ignore SMART Usage and Prefailure attribute changes? The rationale is that smartd will send out separate email anyway when something bad happens. Comments? -- .''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' :proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `.

Re: [Logcheck-devel] smart attribute messages

2006-07-05 Thread maximilian attems
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:40:01PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: Can we please ignore SMART Usage and Prefailure attribute changes? The rationale is that smartd will send out separate email anyway when something bad happens. Comments? we already do the same for nagios. -- maks