Re: [LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log
Stuart, Got it! Again, thank you for the time that you put into your replies, especially on a Saturday! Bob On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Stuart Raeburn wrote: > Bob, > > When you submit a web form, the form data sent by the browser will include > the names of any input items where type="text", regardless of whether > anything has been typed in the textbox. > > Conversely, if the web form includes a radio button group, the form data > sent by the browser will only include the (common) name of the radio > buttons in the group, if one of the buttons has been selected. If it so > happened that value="" for the selected radio button, then the form data > would also include a a value of "" for that named element. > > If none of the buttons in a radio button group has been selected, then the > name of that group will not be included in the form data sent by the > browser. > > So, yes, the browser treats radio buttons differently from textboxes, such > that in any submission you'll always see these three items: > > HWVAL_12 > HWVAL_16 > HWVAL_18 > > in the "POST" item in the activity log created by a submission, because > all are textboxes (input type="text"), but you'll only see this item: > > HWVAL_14 > > if one of the radio buttons had been selected. And consequently you'll > never see: HWVAL_14 = (with the right side blank), because all of the > radio buttons have an associated value in this case where the radio buttons > are present because it is a numericalresponse item with question type set > to exam. > > > > Stuart Raeburn > LON-CAPA Academic Consortium > > > Quoting Bob Gonzales : > > Stuart, >> >> Thanks for the detailed response! >> >> I'm still confused about the line containing HWVAL_14 only showing up in a >> POST when there was a radio button selected but not at other times. The >> lines containing the other HWVAL_'s appear in every POST even when they >> didn't have a value entered, and after they had values submitted. So, >> from >> your response, this resulted because part 13 (HWVAL_14) was set to type >> exam. In fact, it was set to type exam. If this is the reason, why are >> exam questions treated differently than the other questions? >> >> Thanks, >> Bob Gonzales >> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Raeburn wrote: >> >> Bob, >>> >>> I am assuming the question type was set to "exam" for part 13, because >>> /res/sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol. >>> relations.problem >>> is a four part problem containing four numericalresponse items (one for >>> each part). >>> >>> The "POST" entries record the value(s) entered by the student in the web >>> form when a submit button was pushed -- either typed into a textbox in >>> numericalresponse in standard mode, or the value for a radio button which >>> is selected, (i.e., for numericalresponse in exam mode). >>> >>> However, in a multi-part problem, each part has its own "Submit Answer" >>> button, and the only value(s) which will be stored (in the "CSTORE") >>> is/are >>> for the response item(s) belonging to the part for which the "Submit >>> Answer" button was pushed. >>> >>> The activity log shows the following actions: >>> >>> 20:16:47 Submit Answer button pushed for part 11 >>> Value for response item in part 11 (id=12) was: .0045 M >>> >>> 20:21:01 Submit Answer button pushed for part 15 >>> Value for response item in part 15 (id=16) was: 26.56 g >>> >>> 20:23:46 Submit Answer button pushed for part 17 >>> Value for response item in part 17 (id=18) was .282 L >>> >>> The button was never pushed for part 13, so no submission is recorded for >>> response item 14. >>> >>> However, the radio button for response item 14 (in part 13) was checked >>> when the button was pushed for part 15 at 20:21:01, so the POST includes >>> a >>> value for "0.593069306930693" for HWVAL_14, but the submission is not >>> recorded in the student's submission history, because the "Submit Answer" >>> button was not pushed for part 13. >>> >>> >>> >>> Stuart Raeburn >>> LON-CAPA Academic Consortium >>> >>> >>> Quoting Bob Gonzales : >>> >>> Hi, >>> I had a student who claims he submitted an answer and didn't get credit for it. This happened during a quiz so he didn't get the problem status, or a receipt, at the time of the submission. In looking through the activity file I see something that I don't understand and was wondering if it was somehow related. The problem has 4 parts. The 2nd part is a radiobuttonresponse and it is the one that the student claims to have answered. In the activity log excerpt below, the 2nd part is HWVAL_14. The thing that I don't understand is that HWVAL_14 doesn't show up in the POST on line 469 for the 1st part like the other parts do. Then it shows up on line 468 with a value. Line 468 is a POST for the 3rd part as indicated by the submission in the CSTORE on line 467. Then on line 46
Re: [LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log
Bob, When you submit a web form, the form data sent by the browser will include the names of any input items where type="text", regardless of whether anything has been typed in the textbox. Conversely, if the web form includes a radio button group, the form data sent by the browser will only include the (common) name of the radio buttons in the group, if one of the buttons has been selected. If it so happened that value="" for the selected radio button, then the form data would also include a a value of "" for that named element. If none of the buttons in a radio button group has been selected, then the name of that group will not be included in the form data sent by the browser. So, yes, the browser treats radio buttons differently from textboxes, such that in any submission you'll always see these three items: HWVAL_12 HWVAL_16 HWVAL_18 in the "POST" item in the activity log created by a submission, because all are textboxes (input type="text"), but you'll only see this item: HWVAL_14 if one of the radio buttons had been selected. And consequently you'll never see: HWVAL_14 = (with the right side blank), because all of the radio buttons have an associated value in this case where the radio buttons are present because it is a numericalresponse item with question type set to exam. Stuart Raeburn LON-CAPA Academic Consortium Quoting Bob Gonzales : Stuart, Thanks for the detailed response! I'm still confused about the line containing HWVAL_14 only showing up in a POST when there was a radio button selected but not at other times. The lines containing the other HWVAL_'s appear in every POST even when they didn't have a value entered, and after they had values submitted. So, from your response, this resulted because part 13 (HWVAL_14) was set to type exam. In fact, it was set to type exam. If this is the reason, why are exam questions treated differently than the other questions? Thanks, Bob Gonzales On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Raeburn wrote: Bob, I am assuming the question type was set to "exam" for part 13, because /res/sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem is a four part problem containing four numericalresponse items (one for each part). The "POST" entries record the value(s) entered by the student in the web form when a submit button was pushed -- either typed into a textbox in numericalresponse in standard mode, or the value for a radio button which is selected, (i.e., for numericalresponse in exam mode). However, in a multi-part problem, each part has its own "Submit Answer" button, and the only value(s) which will be stored (in the "CSTORE") is/are for the response item(s) belonging to the part for which the "Submit Answer" button was pushed. The activity log shows the following actions: 20:16:47 Submit Answer button pushed for part 11 Value for response item in part 11 (id=12) was: .0045 M 20:21:01 Submit Answer button pushed for part 15 Value for response item in part 15 (id=16) was: 26.56 g 20:23:46 Submit Answer button pushed for part 17 Value for response item in part 17 (id=18) was .282 L The button was never pushed for part 13, so no submission is recorded for response item 14. However, the radio button for response item 14 (in part 13) was checked when the button was pushed for part 15 at 20:21:01, so the POST includes a value for "0.593069306930693" for HWVAL_14, but the submission is not recorded in the student's submission history, because the "Submit Answer" button was not pushed for part 13. Stuart Raeburn LON-CAPA Academic Consortium Quoting Bob Gonzales : Hi, I had a student who claims he submitted an answer and didn't get credit for it. This happened during a quiz so he didn't get the problem status, or a receipt, at the time of the submission. In looking through the activity file I see something that I don't understand and was wondering if it was somehow related. The problem has 4 parts. The 2nd part is a radiobuttonresponse and it is the one that the student claims to have answered. In the activity log excerpt below, the 2nd part is HWVAL_14. The thing that I don't understand is that HWVAL_14 doesn't show up in the POST on line 469 for the 1st part like the other parts do. Then it shows up on line 468 with a value. Line 468 is a POST for the 3rd part as indicated by the submission in the CSTORE on line 467. Then on line 465, the POST for the 4th part, HWVAL_14 is missing again. Looking at the issue of not getting credit for the submission, did he click on a radio button but not the submit button for that part (the 2nd part). Then when he submitted his answer for the 3rd part, the 2nd part POST'ed too but lon-capa didn't grade it since the submit was not for the 3rd part. That seems reasonable. Is there an explanation for the line HWVAL_14 appearing and disappearing? I thought maybe the activity log might be corrupt but grading indicates "Nothin
Re: [LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log
Stuart, Thanks for the detailed response! I'm still confused about the line containing HWVAL_14 only showing up in a POST when there was a radio button selected but not at other times. The lines containing the other HWVAL_'s appear in every POST even when they didn't have a value entered, and after they had values submitted. So, from your response, this resulted because part 13 (HWVAL_14) was set to type exam. In fact, it was set to type exam. If this is the reason, why are exam questions treated differently than the other questions? Thanks, Bob Gonzales On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Stuart Raeburn wrote: > Bob, > > I am assuming the question type was set to "exam" for part 13, because > /res/sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem > is a four part problem containing four numericalresponse items (one for > each part). > > The "POST" entries record the value(s) entered by the student in the web > form when a submit button was pushed -- either typed into a textbox in > numericalresponse in standard mode, or the value for a radio button which > is selected, (i.e., for numericalresponse in exam mode). > > However, in a multi-part problem, each part has its own "Submit Answer" > button, and the only value(s) which will be stored (in the "CSTORE") is/are > for the response item(s) belonging to the part for which the "Submit > Answer" button was pushed. > > The activity log shows the following actions: > > 20:16:47 Submit Answer button pushed for part 11 > Value for response item in part 11 (id=12) was: .0045 M > > 20:21:01 Submit Answer button pushed for part 15 > Value for response item in part 15 (id=16) was: 26.56 g > > 20:23:46 Submit Answer button pushed for part 17 > Value for response item in part 17 (id=18) was .282 L > > The button was never pushed for part 13, so no submission is recorded for > response item 14. > > However, the radio button for response item 14 (in part 13) was checked > when the button was pushed for part 15 at 20:21:01, so the POST includes a > value for "0.593069306930693" for HWVAL_14, but the submission is not > recorded in the student's submission history, because the "Submit Answer" > button was not pushed for part 13. > > > > Stuart Raeburn > LON-CAPA Academic Consortium > > > Quoting Bob Gonzales : > > Hi, >> >> I had a student who claims he submitted an answer and didn't get credit >> for >> it. This happened during a quiz so he didn't get the problem status, or a >> receipt, at the time of the submission. In looking through the activity >> file I see something that I don't understand and was wondering if it was >> somehow related. >> >> The problem has 4 parts. The 2nd part is a radiobuttonresponse and it is >> the one that the student claims to have answered. In the activity log >> excerpt below, the 2nd part is HWVAL_14. >> >> The thing that I don't understand is that HWVAL_14 doesn't show up in the >> POST on line 469 for the 1st part like the other parts do. Then it shows >> up on line 468 with a value. Line 468 is a POST for the 3rd part as >> indicated by the submission in the CSTORE on line 467. Then on line 465, >> the POST for the 4th part, HWVAL_14 is missing again. >> >> Looking at the issue of not getting credit for the submission, did he >> click >> on a radio button but not the submit button for that part (the 2nd part). >> Then when he submitted his answer for the 3rd part, the 2nd part POST'ed >> too but lon-capa didn't grade it since the submit was not for the 3rd >> part. That seems reasonable. >> >> Is there an explanation for the line HWVAL_14 appearing and disappearing? >> I thought maybe the activity log might be corrupt but grading >> indicates "Nothing >> submitted - no attempts." >> >> Are these 2 things related? >> >> ACTIVITY LOG: >> >> 465 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 POST >> HWVAL_12 = .0045 M >> HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g >> HWVAL_18 = .282 L >> submitted = part_17 >> symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ >> 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ >> chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem >> 466Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 CSTORE >> host = binghamtona2 >> resource.17.18.answername = INTERNAL >> resource.17.18.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS >> resource.17.18.awardmsg = >> resource.17.18.submission = .282 L >> resource.17.award = APPROX_ANS >> resource.17.awarded = 1 >> resource.17.awardmsg = >> resource.17.duedate = 1475803800 >> resource.17.hinttries = 1 >> resource.17.maxtries = 3 >> resource.17.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 >> resource.17.solved = correct_by_student >> resource.17.tries = 1 >> resource.17.type = problem >> resource.17.version = >> >> 467Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:05 CSTORE >> host = binghamtona2 >> resource.15.16.answername = INTERNAL >> resource.15.16.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS >> resource.15.16.awardmsg = >> resource.15.16.submission = 26.56 g >> resource.15.award = APPROX_ANS >> resource.15.awa
Re: [LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log
Bob, I am assuming the question type was set to "exam" for part 13, because /res/sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem is a four part problem containing four numericalresponse items (one for each part). The "POST" entries record the value(s) entered by the student in the web form when a submit button was pushed -- either typed into a textbox in numericalresponse in standard mode, or the value for a radio button which is selected, (i.e., for numericalresponse in exam mode). However, in a multi-part problem, each part has its own "Submit Answer" button, and the only value(s) which will be stored (in the "CSTORE") is/are for the response item(s) belonging to the part for which the "Submit Answer" button was pushed. The activity log shows the following actions: 20:16:47 Submit Answer button pushed for part 11 Value for response item in part 11 (id=12) was: .0045 M 20:21:01 Submit Answer button pushed for part 15 Value for response item in part 15 (id=16) was: 26.56 g 20:23:46 Submit Answer button pushed for part 17 Value for response item in part 17 (id=18) was .282 L The button was never pushed for part 13, so no submission is recorded for response item 14. However, the radio button for response item 14 (in part 13) was checked when the button was pushed for part 15 at 20:21:01, so the POST includes a value for "0.593069306930693" for HWVAL_14, but the submission is not recorded in the student's submission history, because the "Submit Answer" button was not pushed for part 13. Stuart Raeburn LON-CAPA Academic Consortium Quoting Bob Gonzales : Hi, I had a student who claims he submitted an answer and didn't get credit for it. This happened during a quiz so he didn't get the problem status, or a receipt, at the time of the submission. In looking through the activity file I see something that I don't understand and was wondering if it was somehow related. The problem has 4 parts. The 2nd part is a radiobuttonresponse and it is the one that the student claims to have answered. In the activity log excerpt below, the 2nd part is HWVAL_14. The thing that I don't understand is that HWVAL_14 doesn't show up in the POST on line 469 for the 1st part like the other parts do. Then it shows up on line 468 with a value. Line 468 is a POST for the 3rd part as indicated by the submission in the CSTORE on line 467. Then on line 465, the POST for the 4th part, HWVAL_14 is missing again. Looking at the issue of not getting credit for the submission, did he click on a radio button but not the submit button for that part (the 2nd part). Then when he submitted his answer for the 3rd part, the 2nd part POST'ed too but lon-capa didn't grade it since the submit was not for the 3rd part. That seems reasonable. Is there an explanation for the line HWVAL_14 appearing and disappearing? I thought maybe the activity log might be corrupt but grading indicates "Nothing submitted - no attempts." Are these 2 things related? ACTIVITY LOG: 465 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g HWVAL_18 = .282 L submitted = part_17 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 466Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 resource.17.18.answername = INTERNAL resource.17.18.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.17.18.awardmsg = resource.17.18.submission = .282 L resource.17.award = APPROX_ANS resource.17.awarded = 1 resource.17.awardmsg = resource.17.duedate = 1475803800 resource.17.hinttries = 1 resource.17.maxtries = 3 resource.17.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.17.solved = correct_by_student resource.17.tries = 1 resource.17.type = problem resource.17.version = 467Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:05 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 resource.15.16.answername = INTERNAL resource.15.16.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.15.16.awardmsg = resource.15.16.submission = 26.56 g resource.15.award = APPROX_ANS resource.15.awarded = 1 resource.15.awardmsg = resource.15.duedate = 1475803800 resource.15.hinttries = 1 resource.15.maxtries = 3 resource.15.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.15.solved = correct_by_student resource.15.tries = 1 resource.15.type = problem resource.15.version = 468 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:01 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_14 = 0.593069306930693 HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g HWVAL_18 = submitted = part_15 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 469 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:16:47 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_16 = HWVAL_18 = submitted = part_11 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.r
Re: [LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log
My guess would be in line with yours, that he clicked the radio button but did not hit the submit button for that part. When he submitted the third question, Lon-Capa knew about the radio button but did not evaluate it. It didn’t show up with the question 4 submission because when the page reloaded after question 3 was submitted, question 2 went back to its default of no selections, since it had not been submitted, evaluated, etc. That’s what I expect took place, but am eager to learn if that is not correct. Doug Douglas Mills Director of Instructional Technology Department of Chemistry University of Illinois From: on behalf of Bob Gonzales Reply-To: Discussion list for LON-CAPA users Date: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 2:43 PM To: Discussion list for LON-CAPA users Subject: [LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log Hi, I had a student who claims he submitted an answer and didn't get credit for it. This happened during a quiz so he didn't get the problem status, or a receipt, at the time of the submission. In looking through the activity file I see something that I don't understand and was wondering if it was somehow related. The problem has 4 parts. The 2nd part is a radiobuttonresponse and it is the one that the student claims to have answered. In the activity log excerpt below, the 2nd part is HWVAL_14. The thing that I don't understand is that HWVAL_14 doesn't show up in the POST on line 469 for the 1st part like the other parts do. Then it shows up on line 468 with a value. Line 468 is a POST for the 3rd part as indicated by the submission in the CSTORE on line 467. Then on line 465, the POST for the 4th part, HWVAL_14 is missing again. Looking at the issue of not getting credit for the submission, did he click on a radio button but not the submit button for that part (the 2nd part). Then when he submitted his answer for the 3rd part, the 2nd part POST'ed too but lon-capa didn't grade it since the submit was not for the 3rd part. That seems reasonable. Is there an explanation for the line HWVAL_14 appearing and disappearing? I thought maybe the activity log might be corrupt but grading indicates "Nothing submitted - no attempts." Are these 2 things related? ACTIVITY LOG: 465 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g HWVAL_18 = .282 L submitted = part_17 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 466Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 ip = 149.125.81.232 resource.17.18.answername = INTERNAL resource.17.18.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.17.18.awardmsg = resource.17.18.submission = .282 L resource.17.award = APPROX_ANS resource.17.awarded = 1 resource.17.awardmsg = resource.17.duedate = 1475803800 resource.17.hinttries = 1 resource.17.maxtries = 3 resource.17.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.17.solved = correct_by_student resource.17.tries = 1 resource.17.type = problem resource.17.version = 467Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:05 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 ip = 149.125.81.232 resource.15.16.answername = INTERNAL resource.15.16.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.15.16.awardmsg = resource.15.16.submission = 26.56 g resource.15.award = APPROX_ANS resource.15.awarded = 1 resource.15.awardmsg = resource.15.duedate = 1475803800 resource.15.hinttries = 1 resource.15.maxtries = 3 resource.15.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.15.solved = correct_by_student resource.15.tries = 1 resource.15.type = problem resource.15.version = 468 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:01 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_14 = 0.593069306930693 HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g HWVAL_18 = submitted = part_15 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 469 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:16:47 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_16 = HWVAL_18 = submitted = part_11 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 470 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:16:47 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 ip = 149.125.81.232 resource.11.12.answername = INTERNAL resource.11.12.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.11.12.awardmsg = resource.11.12.submission = .0045 M resource.11.award = APPROX_ANS resource.11.awarded = 1 resource.11.awardmsg = resource.11.duedate = 1475803800 resource.11.hinttries = 1 resource.11.maxtries = 3 resource.11.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.11.solved = correct_by_student resource.11.tries =
[LON-CAPA-users] question about entries in the activity log
Hi, I had a student who claims he submitted an answer and didn't get credit for it. This happened during a quiz so he didn't get the problem status, or a receipt, at the time of the submission. In looking through the activity file I see something that I don't understand and was wondering if it was somehow related. The problem has 4 parts. The 2nd part is a radiobuttonresponse and it is the one that the student claims to have answered. In the activity log excerpt below, the 2nd part is HWVAL_14. The thing that I don't understand is that HWVAL_14 doesn't show up in the POST on line 469 for the 1st part like the other parts do. Then it shows up on line 468 with a value. Line 468 is a POST for the 3rd part as indicated by the submission in the CSTORE on line 467. Then on line 465, the POST for the 4th part, HWVAL_14 is missing again. Looking at the issue of not getting credit for the submission, did he click on a radio button but not the submit button for that part (the 2nd part). Then when he submitted his answer for the 3rd part, the 2nd part POST'ed too but lon-capa didn't grade it since the submit was not for the 3rd part. That seems reasonable. Is there an explanation for the line HWVAL_14 appearing and disappearing? I thought maybe the activity log might be corrupt but grading indicates "Nothing submitted - no attempts." Are these 2 things related? ACTIVITY LOG: 465 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g HWVAL_18 = .282 L submitted = part_17 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 466Question 2 2016-10-06 20:23:46 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 ip = 149.125.81.232 resource.17.18.answername = INTERNAL resource.17.18.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.17.18.awardmsg = resource.17.18.submission = .282 L resource.17.award = APPROX_ANS resource.17.awarded = 1 resource.17.awardmsg = resource.17.duedate = 1475803800 resource.17.hinttries = 1 resource.17.maxtries = 3 resource.17.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.17.solved = correct_by_student resource.17.tries = 1 resource.17.type = problem resource.17.version = 467Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:05 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 ip = 149.125.81.232 resource.15.16.answername = INTERNAL resource.15.16.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.15.16.awardmsg = resource.15.16.submission = 26.56 g resource.15.award = APPROX_ANS resource.15.awarded = 1 resource.15.awardmsg = resource.15.duedate = 1475803800 resource.15.hinttries = 1 resource.15.maxtries = 3 resource.15.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.15.solved = correct_by_student resource.15.tries = 1 resource.15.type = problem resource.15.version = 468 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:21:01 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_14 = 0.593069306930693 HWVAL_16 = 26.56 g HWVAL_18 = submitted = part_15 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 469 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:16:47 POST HWVAL_12 = .0045 M HWVAL_16 = HWVAL_18 = submitted = part_11 symb = uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem 470 Question 2 2016-10-06 20:16:47 CSTORE host = binghamtona2 ip = 149.125.81.232 resource.11.12.answername = INTERNAL resource.11.12.awarddetail = APPROX_ANS resource.11.12.awardmsg = resource.11.12.submission = .0045 M resource.11.award = APPROX_ANS resource.11.awarded = 1 resource.11.awardmsg = resource.11.duedate = 1475803800 resource.11.hinttries = 1 resource.11.maxtries = 3 resource.11.rndseed = 644052659:1049734531 resource.11.solved = correct_by_student resource.11.tries = 1 resource.11.type = problem resource.11.version = 471Question 2 2016-10-06 20:15:10 POST symb=uploaded/binghamton/7i6759115966957b9binghamtonl1/default_ 141406948640900531475249776.sequence___32___sfu/batchelo/ chem111/problems/lecture/set7/M.mass.vol.relations.problem Thanks, Bob Gonzales ___ LON-CAPA-users mailing list LON-CAPA-users@mail.lon-capa.org http://mail.lon-capa.org/mailman/listinfo/lon-capa-users
