Re: Perl::Flash

2000-12-30 Thread Chris Heathcote
on 30/12/00 2:22 am, Mark Fowler wrote: > See Leon, I told you that unlimited bandwidth option was a good idea. It has always struck me that the best way to do a really evil Denial of Service is to suck a little bandwidth all the time many people pay per byte, and bankrupting them is an evil

Re: Perl::Flash

2000-12-29 Thread Mark Fowler
> So the answer to Dave's question is possible "Maybe not" :-( No the answer to Dave's question is defiantly not. Server load was at 30 when I last checked an hour ago. This month we have been mainly learning * NTK = good * use.perl.org = good * www.ora.com = good * slashdot = bad. Oh,

Re: Perl::Flash

2000-12-29 Thread Neil Ford
>It seems that Simon's Perl::Flash is currently the lead story on /. > >I hope the server can handle it :( > >Dave.. > The following link; http://www.2shortplanks.com/flash/stuff/DemoCode/Circle/circle.cgi?text=perl+is+my+bitch produced the following error; >Internal

Perl::Flash

2000-12-29 Thread Dave Cross
It seems that Simon's Perl::Flash is currently the lead story on /. I hope the server can handle it :( Dave.. -- http://www.dave.org.uk | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data Munging with Perl <http://www.manning.com/cross/>