Re: Perl CGI For The World Wide Web

2001-06-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Dave Cross wrote: Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this was? Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input is useful and I've just

Re: Perl CGI For The World Wide Web

2001-06-11 Thread Dan Packer
I consider this a massive improvement. The mere fact that Perl and CGI are actually differentiated in the title is a marvel in and of itself. Thank God for small miracles. Daniel Packer

Re: Perl CGI For The World Wide Web

2001-06-10 Thread James Powell
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:16:03PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this was? Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input is

Perl CGI For The World Wide Web

2001-06-09 Thread Dave Cross
Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this was? Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input is useful and I've just received a copy of the second edition of the

Re: Perl CGI For The World Wide Web

2001-06-09 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this was? Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off big-time on Amazon. Somehow I've managed to make her thing that my input is useful and I've just

Re: Perl CGI For The World Wide Web

2001-06-09 Thread Dave Cross
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 12:10:08PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Remember the discussion some months ago about what a horrible book this was? Well, I've been exchanging emails with the author since slagging her off big-time on