Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
 If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q and ^S for you.
 stty -ixon
 removes this problem.

But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your
less,more,pg,sed,awkperl binaries are all fscked?  :-)

-Dom



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
  If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q 
  and ^S for you.
  stty -ixon
  removes this problem.
 
 But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your
 less,more,pg,sed,awkperl binaries are all fscked?  :-)

Use dd with the count= option for the first page, and with count= and skip=
for subsequent pages :)

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:10:13AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
 Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
   If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q 
   and ^S for you.
   stty -ixon
   removes this problem.
  
  But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your
  less,more,pg,sed,awkperl binaries are all fscked?  :-)
 
 Use dd with the count= option for the first page, and with count= and skip=
 for subsequent pages :)

You're right, but assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can
still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well.  Although it'd be hard
to control without ^S and ^Q, unless you have a modern /bin/sh with the
arithmetic stuff to count lines with.  Otherwise you'd have to use
expr(1), which is also probably busted.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled comp.unix.buffy debate...

-Dom



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Hodgkinson

Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
  If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q and ^S for you.
  stty -ixon
  removes this problem.
 
 But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your
 less,more,pg,sed,awkperl binaries are all fscked?  :-)

Stallman used to have a long rant about ^S/^Q that shipped with
the emacs source. Wonder if it's still there.

-- 
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star   http://www.deep-purple.com
  Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
   



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can
 still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well.

This is not going to help you pause output.

 Although it'd be hard to control without ^S and ^Q,

...which was what the original post was all about.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Peter Haworth

On Thu, 10 May 2001 22:25:00 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
 (Someone has a quote about the only safe thing to send down a serial line
 being a break, because emacs interprets every character)

You mean this?
On a normal ascii line, the only safe condition to detect is a 'BREAK'
 - everything else having been assigned functions by Gnu EMACS.
-- Tarl Neustaedter

I find that having an enormous sig file is extremely useful on occasions like this.

-- 
Peter Haworth   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The network had broken because someone had snipped out
 40 cm of cable, apparently to tie something together.
-- Alex McLean



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
 Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can
  still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well.
 
 This is not going to help you pause output.
 
  Although it'd be hard to control without ^S and ^Q,
 
 ...which was what the original post was all about.

No, you'd need the maths operators that came with later shells, so you
could work out lines.  Dammit, I'm going to have to write shmore now.

#!/bin/sh
lineno=1
while read line
do
echo $line
lineno=$((lineno+1))
if [ $(($lineno % 24)) = 0 ] ; then
echo -n  -- more -- 
read ans /dev/tty
test $ans = q  exit 0
fi
done

-Dom



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
  Dominic Mitchell wrote:
   assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can
   still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well.
  This is not going to help you pause output.
   Although it'd be hard to control without ^S and ^Q,
  ...which was what the original post was all about.
 No, you'd need the maths operators that came with later shells, so you
 could work out lines.  Dammit, I'm going to have to write shmore now.
 #!/bin/sh
 lineno=1
 while read line
 do
   echo $line
   lineno=$((lineno+1))
   if [ $(($lineno % 24)) = 0 ] ; then
   echo -n  -- more -- 
   read ans /dev/tty
   test $ans = q  exit 0
   fi
 done

That breaks if the line is longer than the width of your screen.

MBM

-- 
Matthew Byng-Maddick  [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20  8980 5714  (Home)
http://colondot.net/ +44 7956 613942  (Mobile)
Under  any conditions,  anywhere,  whatever you  are doing,  there is some
ordinance under which you can be booked.  -- Robert D. Sprecht, Rand Corp.




Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:14:08AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
   Dominic Mitchell wrote:
assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can
still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well.
   This is not going to help you pause output.
Although it'd be hard to control without ^S and ^Q,
   ...which was what the original post was all about.
  No, you'd need the maths operators that came with later shells, so you
  could work out lines.  Dammit, I'm going to have to write shmore now.
  #!/bin/sh
  lineno=1
  while read line
  do
  echo $line
  lineno=$((lineno+1))
  if [ $(($lineno % 24)) = 0 ] ; then
  echo -n  -- more -- 
  read ans /dev/tty
  test $ans = q  exit 0
  fi
  done
 
 That breaks if the line is longer than the width of your screen.

Oh dear.

-Dom



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
 That breaks if the line is longer than the width of your screen.

So do a lot of cheap pager routines.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson

At 10:32 11/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
   If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q and ^S for you.
   stty -ixon
   removes this problem.
 
  But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your
  less,more,pg,sed,awkperl binaries are all fscked?  :-)

Stallman used to have a long rant about ^S/^Q that shipped with
the emacs source. Wonder if it's still there.

You know, from the outside, Unix looks so well designed and clean and modern...


-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Roger Burton West

On or about Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson typed:

You know, from the outside, Unix looks so well designed and clean and modern...

From the outside, Windows looks as if it works.

ObRant: computers and OSes in their current state are not consumer devices.
They're not sufficiently reliable or intuitive. Bad marketing has made
people think they need the things; most of them are wrong...

Roger



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Struan Donald

* at 11/05 11:32 +0100 Roger Burton West said:
 On or about Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:48:41AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson typed:
 
 You know, from the outside, Unix looks so well designed and clean and modern...
 
 From the outside, Windows looks as if it works.
 
 ObRant: computers and OSes in their current state are not consumer devices.
 They're not sufficiently reliable or intuitive. Bad marketing has made
 people think they need the things; most of them are wrong...

you just have to see that people have trouble with palm's sometimes
and they are so much more simple to realise that your average fully
fledged computer in not a consumer device.

but then any reasonably flexible multi-purpose device is always going
to have a hard time being a consumer device as by it's nature it's
complex and trying to make complex things appear simple is very very
hard.

OTOH, if it was simple it's be no fun :) [1]

struan

[1] usual caveats regarding definition of fun apply



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Hodgkinson

Roger Burton West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ObRant: computers and OSes in their current state are not consumer devices.
 They're not sufficiently reliable or intuitive. Bad marketing has made
 people think they need the things; most of them are wrong...

OK, so what does it take?

For me, the sorts of things that I _think_ IPv6 has should go a long
way. Ubiquitous encryption and authentication will breed the real next
generation of applicances. Or something.

-- 
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star   http://www.deep-purple.com
  Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
   



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Roger Burton West

On or about Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:37:20AM +0100, Struan Donald typed:

but then any reasonably flexible multi-purpose device is always going
to have a hard time being a consumer device as by it's nature it's
complex and trying to make complex things appear simple is very very
hard.

Yes.

Things like the Amstrad word-processor are what people really want.
(Just ask any secretary who was forced to upgrade from one to a PC.)

R



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Roger Burton West

On or about Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:32:33AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson typed:
Roger Burton West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 ObRant: computers and OSes in their current state are not consumer devices.
 They're not sufficiently reliable or intuitive. Bad marketing has made
 people think they need the things; most of them are wrong...
OK, so what does it take?

While using a computer is a skill considered harder than using a
washing machine or mowing a lawn, they're not ready.

Putting pretty interfaces on existing unstable systems does not
help to make them simpler...

R



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson

At 11:37 11/05/01 +0100, you wrote:

but then any reasonably flexible multi-purpose device is always going
to have a hard time being a consumer device as by it's nature it's
complex and trying to make complex things appear simple is very very
hard.


I can never work out if life is getting simpler or more complex. Computers 
seem very complex, and an application (lets say, a spreadsheet) appears to 
have thousands of features and whatnot that make the business of creating a 
Profit/Loss sheet far more complex than it ever was (or by implication 
ought to be).

But this replaced a system of copybooks, ledgers, accounting systems and 
procedures that was also very complex. Not only that, but all the actual 
arithmetic had to be done (by the human) as well. So the accountant of 1890 
needed to do mental arithmetic very fast and accurately (and in L.S.D.), 
and had to know and understand a bookshelf full of different ledgers, each 
with different columns, tables and and systems. And they had to work with 
near 100% accuracy, because of the difficulty of erasing or re-doing work.

I think the difference is not that computers (or cars, or whatever) are 
that much more complex than what went before them. The difference is:

1. People are expected to understand and deal with all these things, not to 
specialise in one. Today, we are expected to be able to drive a car and use 
a spreadsheet, and then paint the spare room. The Victorian accountant most 
likely would not have known how to ride, certainly not have known how to 
look after a horse. They would not have done their own cooking, even, would 
not be responsible for repairing or even organising repairs to their rented 
accomodation, etc etc.

2. The rate of change is very fast. The Victorian's system of accountancy, 
while more complex, would have been what he grew up with, and would not 
have changed radically over his life (assuming he retired prior to the 
1940's).

Jon

I see a topic far in the distance and rapidly dwindling...
-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Hodgkinson

Roger Burton West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Putting pretty interfaces on existing unstable systems does not
 help to make them simpler...

That's part of it. Landing a thudding great book of what the thing
_can_ do, rather than a cookbook of what you _want_ it to do is very
offputting.

There's a computer version of the Poke'mon card game that leads you
through learning the rules very gently and very well. That's the sort
of thing we need for gadgets...start off with stop and play and
then gently lead you through to the hard stuff.

Or make it like the Tivo - it just works.

-- 
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star   http://www.deep-purple.com
  Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
   



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Struan Donald

* at 11/05 11:49 +0100 Dave Hodgkinson said:
 Roger Burton West [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Putting pretty interfaces on existing unstable systems does not
  help to make them simpler...
 
 That's part of it. Landing a thudding great book of what the thing
 _can_ do, rather than a cookbook of what you _want_ it to do is very
 offputting.

but then what you want to do differs greatly for different people so
instead of one book with lots of information you have to sift through
you get lots of books you have to sift through to find the right one.
I imagine most computer neophytes find their first visit to the
computer section of any large bookshop pretty damn confusing to start
with. 

plus you're assuming people know what they want to do, or even what
they can do. The fact that you could have _two_ windows open at once
was a revelation to a friends dad recently. 

There is a very real argument for devices that do one thing and one
thing only but do it in a very simple way without all the flimflam
that accompanies most modern computers. Donald Norman has quite a few
good books on this.

 Or make it like the Tivo - it just works.

which is kind of a proof of the one thing very well point.

struan



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Hodgkinson

Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 There is a very real argument for devices that do one thing and one
 thing only but do it in a very simple way without all the flimflam
 that accompanies most modern computers. Donald Norman has quite a few
 good books on this.

Agreed, but they MUST talk to each other. Securely and knowingly.

-- 
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star   http://www.deep-purple.com
  Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
   



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Struan Donald

* at 11/05 12:07 +0100 Dave Hodgkinson said:
 Struan Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  There is a very real argument for devices that do one thing and one
  thing only but do it in a very simple way without all the flimflam
  that accompanies most modern computers. Donald Norman has quite a few
  good books on this.
 
 Agreed, but they MUST talk to each other. Securely and knowingly.

see Donald Norman. he talks about all this stuff.

struan



Tie::Regex::Hash

2001-05-11 Thread Cross David - dcross


Sorry to drag us back on topic, but I thought you might like to tsee this
which I just knocked up for someone on perlmonks.

package Tie::Hash::Regex;

use strict;
use vars qw($VERSION @ISA @EXPORT @EXPORT_OK);

require Exporter;
require Tie::Hash;

@ISA = qw(Exporter Tie::StdHash);
@EXPORT = qw();
@EXPORT_OK =();

$VERSION = '0.01';

sub FETCH {
  my $self = shift;
  my $key = shift;

  return $self-{$key} if exists $self-{$key};

  foreach (keys %$self) {
return $self-{$_} if /$key/;
  }

  return;
}

1;

You use it like this:

use Tie::Hash::Regex

my %hash;

tie %hash, 'Tie::Hash::Regex';

$hash{key} = 'one';
$hash{stuff} = 'two';

print $hash{key}\n;  # prints 'one'
print $hash{'^s'}\n; # prints 'two'
print $hash{'y'}\n;  # prints 'one'
print $hash{'.*'}\n; # prints 'two'

The last is, of course, of limited use as it just matches the first key it
finds in the hash.

Share and Enjoy,

Dave...


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.



(OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Mison

As was discussed (after Greg and the steak posse had left last night),
there may be a second constrained walk (following on from the epic
London Walk, somewhat documented on http://husk.org/lndn/walk/),
probably around the stations above the Circle Line, sometime in the
next two or three weeks.

I estimate it'd be between six and eight hours of walking, but as we've
now done one walk starting at sunrise, I thought it'd be fine to start
it a little later in the day; there's probably going to be debate about
where to start and which direction to walk in too. To save London.pm
from this distraction, I've (finally, cheers Evil) set up the long
threatened crisps mailing list for potential walkers; email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body subscribe crisps to join, if you're
interested in taking part in this or other walks.

--
:: paul
:: how fickle fate can be





Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Devers

At 10:05 AM 2001.05.11 +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:25:00PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
 If your terminal has flow control enabled it will eat ^Q and ^S
 for you. stty -ixon removes this problem.

But then how do you pause that long ls listing when your
less,more,pg,sed,awkperl binaries are all fscked?  :-)

How about piping to lp then?
Load up enough paper and you can pause as long as you'd like...
;)



--
Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: see attachment

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Devers

At 10:06 PM 2001.05.09 +0100, Grep wrote:
well i had 15 minutes to spare so i decided to do this ...

Lessee...

Let's make a film, a travel film, involving Damien-esque programming as a 
plot device. We can make PIMF (Perl is my Film) tshirts to promote it, 
even if Randal doesn't like them. It will involve many pub scenes, Viking 
type raids on unsuspecting other groups (webboards might not work, but 
something to that effect). 

In homage to great cinema epic Ishtar, there will be camel scenes (but 
at the zoo), after which the camel will be served as supper, followed by 
dinner table cameos by Dr Who  Willow (on a pony), who will show how to 
prepare for the coming Y2K crisis. 

That covers most of 'em. Drink up!



--
Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]




New Mongers' Script Archive Update

2001-05-11 Thread Mark Fowler

I am posting an update of what's going on with this to the list because,
erm, dave told me to.

Right, this is what has happened/will happen:

 At the technical meeting it was decided that we need a developers site;
 This site should be used primarily to disseminate information about the
 state of each part of the NMS Archive Project.

 The proposed format for this site is that for each of the sections will
 have a page that will have

  a) a short description of the section
  b) a summary of the current state of affairs
  c) a list of *current* files
  d) a weblog of the recent changes
  e) a pumpking

 The sections will be

  * the website itself
  * the unix install
  * the windows install
  * the mac install
  * one for each script

 The front page will have, in addition to a link to each of the pages, a
 quick summary of the state of affairs of the project and a collection of
 the most recent entries from all the weblogs

 The technology to do all of this will be quick and dirty.  The reasoning
 for this is simple:

  1) Let's do it quickly, and we can refactor later.

  2) The code we're using isn't that complicated and something like CVS
 would probably be an overkill.  Likewise for a proper bugzilla
 system.

  3) All changes should be go through the pumpking for each of the
 individual sections so this shouldn't be a problem

 People that have agreed to be pumpkings so far:

  Mark Fowler (that's me) agreed to be website pumpking
  Simon Batistoni agreed to be windows install pumpking.
  Paul Mison agreed to be mac install pumpking

  If you agreed to write a script, you're pumpking for that (note that
  pumpkings can hand the responsibility to other people if they want)

 The developers website is working now, and it's just a matter of slapping
 in the code for listing files, editing the weblogs, and um the sections.
 Shouldn't take that long then ;-)

 The trial website should be up in the next week or so[1] and I'll post
 more info to the list once it's done.

Later.

Mark.

NRN.

[1] Damn nice weather making me want to sit in the sun.

-- 
 dammit jim I'm a doctor not a signature line




Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Martin Ling

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Roger Burton West wrote:
 
 ObRant: computers and OSes in their current state are not consumer devices.

ObRantContinuation:

It goes a little further than that. Cars are now consumer devices; but
if you were deploying a fleet of new company vans, you wouldn't expect
the random office guy who'd read a dummies book to maintain them - you'd
hire a mechanic.


Martin



Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Paul Mison wrote:
 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
following address(es) failed:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
all relevant MX records point to non-existent hosts:
it appears that the DNS operator for this domain has installed an
invalid MX record with an IP address instead of a domain name on the right
hand side

Looks like it:

$ dig @ns.stub.org husk.org axfr

;  DiG 8.2  @ns.stub.org husk.org axfr
; (1 server found)
$ORIGIN husk.org.
@   1D IN SOA   @ root.vx-labs.org. (
2001020100  ; serial
8H  ; refresh
4H  ; retry
10H ; expiry
1D ); minimum

1D IN NSns.vx-labs.org.
1D IN NSns.stub.org.
1D IN A 195.149.50.61
1D IN MX5 195.149.50.61.
*   1D IN A 195.149.50.61
@   1D IN SOA   @ root.vx-labs.org. (
2001020100  ; serial
8H  ; refresh
4H  ; retry
10H ; expiry
1D ); minimum

;; Received 7 answers (7 records).
;; FROM: penderel to SERVER: 193.243.252.29
;; WHEN: Fri May 11 15:47:41 2001

I suggest you shoot the DNS operator for this domain and hire a new one :)

I suppose that in the meantime I'll have to forge a subscription with
`telnet husk.org smtp` if my MUA won't send to it.

Cheers,
Philip



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson

At 15:42 11/05/01 +0100, you wrote:

It goes a little further than that. Cars are now consumer devices; but
if you were deploying a fleet of new company vans, you wouldn't expect
the random office guy who'd read a dummies book to maintain them - you'd
hire a mechanic.


Hmmm.. You're suggesting that the mechanic is a well trained engineer who 
knows all about cars, while companies are trying to get away with using 
pimply faced youths who've just read a book or got an MCP to maintain 
computers on the cheap. Your average mechanic follows instructions on a 
computer that tells him what part number to use to replace the faulty item. 
The act of replacing simply involves known what size socket wrench to use, 
and remembering where to attach the wires and hoses afterwards.

The average bottom rung mechanic knows as much about cars as the average 
bottom rung tech support guy knows about computers.

The difference is that the mechanic can't get a job without his NVQ, 
whereas the PFY can get a job without his MCP.


-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Paul Mison wrote:
 there may be a second constrained walk

What's a constrained walk?

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Dean

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:17:10PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
 Paul Mison wrote:
  there may be a second constrained walk
 
 What's a constrained walk?

About 5 yards. ;)

Dean
-- 
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand
   --- Anon



Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Mison

On 11/05/2001 at 15:55 +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
Paul Mison wrote:
 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

invalid MX record

My DNS service provider (waves at the happy people, they know who they
are) are endevouring to fix this at the moment. Try again on Monday
when I'll put a bit more effort into fixing this.

I see you managed to subscribe anyway; I ph34r y0ur l33t 5M7P sk1llz.

--
:: paul
:: how fickle fate can be





Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

-Dom



Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Martin Ling

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:05:21PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
 
 The average bottom rung mechanic knows as much about cars as the average 
 bottom rung tech support guy knows about computers.

Okay. I know very little of the vehicle maintenance industry, so it was
a poor choice of analogy, but I hold to the rough point - there are too
many organisations (notably schools, as well as companies) pushing
excessive technical responsibilities onto unqualified and inexperienced
staff.  It's not fair on (a) the staff, (b) the rest of the organisation
(c) others affected through poor security (private/personal information
leakage, network abuse...)

...and arguably

(d) unemployed BOFHs.


Martin



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:

 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

monitor type=flatscreen
None ;-)
/

Why, btw?


L.
This cheese intentionally left rank.




Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Mison

On 11/05/2001 at 16:17 +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
Paul Mison wrote:
 there may be a second constrained walk

What's a constrained walk?

This is covered in London Walking by Simon Pope (which is where celia
read about it, which prompted me and Robin to organise it); his idea
was to walk from sunrise to sunset, east to west, along a single row of
the A-Z (the proper edition, with the expanded map of Central London in
the middle).

We [0] took his idea, moved the time of year (he did it in December, so
it was only about 9 hours; we did it in March, so it was more like 12),
turned it around so it was north to south, and managed to get a lot
more people involved. Amazingly, it seemed to be fun, so we're doing it
again.

This time, the constraint is the route; we'll be trying to walk around
the Circle line, either trying to follow it as closely as possible or
just walking between the stations. (We're deciding that on crisps, when
it works.)

--
:: paul
:: how fickle fate can be





Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Paul Mison wrote:
 I see you managed to subscribe anyway; I ph34r y0ur l33t 5M7P sk1llz.

Thanks. They do come in handy quite often. (For example, when verifying an
open relay or seeing whether it anonymises or not.)

I remember the person who taught me SMTP; I'm grateful to him. (Though I
suppose I could have taught myself from the RFC without too much pain; after
all, that's how I learned to speak POP3.)

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Martin Ling

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

Deja vu, I had this thread elsewhere recently (although it was 'things
behind'...)

Here I have nowt, what with it being a laptop and all. At home, er...
more monitors?

http://pkl.net/~martin/room-bredroll.jpg

Old picture. And, er, not me in it. The room's mostly still there
though.


Martin



Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Heathcote

on 11/5/01 4:35 pm, Paul Mison wrote:

 This time, the constraint is the route; we'll be trying to walk around
 the Circle line, either trying to follow it as closely as possible or
 just walking between the stations. (We're deciding that on crisps, when
 it works.)

Has anyone got a proper lundun map with tube lines indicated... that would
be just chops.

c.
-- 
 every day, computers are making people easier to use

  http://www.unorthodoxstyles.com




Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Philip Newton wrote:
 Paul Mison wrote:
  I see you managed to subscribe anyway; I ph34r y0ur l33t 5M7P sk1llz.
 Thanks. They do come in handy quite often. (For example, when verifying an
 open relay or seeing whether it anonymises or not.)
 I remember the person who taught me SMTP; I'm grateful to him. (Though I
 suppose I could have taught myself from the RFC without too much pain; after
 all, that's how I learned to speak POP3.)

I don't see what's so difficult about learning from the RFC. :)

However, the number of people (Bloated Goats, Sexchange) who manage to get
it wrong still surprises me. And the spamware that carries on blindly even
though it gets errors

MBM

-- 
Matthew Byng-Maddick  [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20  8980 5714  (Home)
http://colondot.net/ +44 7956 613942  (Mobile)
Under  any conditions,  anywhere,  whatever you  are doing,  there is some
ordinance under which you can be booked.  -- Robert D. Sprecht, Rand Corp.




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:33:42PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
 
 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 
  How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 
 monitor type=flatscreen
 None ;-)
 /

Boring!  You should be able to manage some clip on furry animals.

For reference, I have 8 Kinder egg toys, 4 of which are Giraffes.

Paul Mison stated that he had nothing on his monitor, but did confess to
having a squealing monkey under his monitor (very bofh-ish, I feel).

 Why, btw?

Because it's Friday Afternoon[tm].  And I want to know.

-Dom



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Niklas Nordebo

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

I have a solitary copy of a japanese netsuke depicting a cat.

My machine is name 'neko', which is japanese for cat.

-- 
Niklas Nordebo -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +447966251290
 The day is seven hours and fifteen minutes old, and already it's
crippled with the weight of my evasions, deceit, and downright lies



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

Depends on the day. Today, two things: a goose called Lucy[1] (a Ty Beanie
Baby) and a green duck called Martin. Both are plush toys.

I generally bring one of my small stuffed toys to work, but sometimes I
forget to take it out of my coat pocket, or forget to bring it along in the
first place. And occasionally, I bring two at once. For example, the day
before yesterday I had two Beanie Baby stuffed geese (of a different design
than Lucy) called Wendy and Henry[2] who are married to one another. (Lucy
and Martin are just friends. Maybe not even that; they're still a bit
cautious about the relationship.)

Cheers,
Philip

[1] Though her tag spells her name Loosy.
[2] Their name tags say Honks; we decided that's their last name. Wendy,
by the way, was bought in London while I was at yapc::Europe::19100, as a
present for my wife.
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Chris Heathcote wrote:
 on 11/5/01 4:35 pm, Paul Mison wrote:
  This time, the constraint is the route; we'll be trying to walk around
  the Circle line, either trying to follow it as closely as possible or
  just walking between the stations. (We're deciding that on crisps, when
  it works.)
 Has anyone got a proper lundun map with tube lines indicated... that would
 be just chops.

There are machines in the tube that sell them.

MBM

-- 
Matthew Byng-Maddick  [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20  8980 5714  (Home)
http://colondot.net/ +44 7956 613942  (Mobile)
Under  any conditions,  anywhere,  whatever you  are doing,  there is some
ordinance under which you can be booked.  -- Robert D. Sprecht, Rand Corp.




Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson

At 16:31 11/05/01 +0100, you wrote:
there are too
many organisations (notably schools, as well as companies) pushing
excessive technical responsibilities onto unqualified and inexperienced
staff.

That's actually a really good point (about the schools). You hear about all 
these 'computers for schools' initiatives, but very rarely do you hear 
about 'CS teachers for schools'. It usually means that some maths teach 
somewhere gets another 2 lessons per week and a small LAN to look after.



Martin

-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 For reference, I have 8 Kinder egg toys, 4 of which are Giraffes.

Ah. At home I also have Kinder egg toys on my monitor. Three of them to be
precise. I think they're all cars.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Philip Newton

Philip Newton wrote:
 I generally bring one of my small stuffed toys to work
 ^
 or my wife's. She has me than I.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



RE: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Robert Thompson

 
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 

Currently none.

But at Torrington I had 8 items ( I think ) including marzipan models of
Bagpuss (complete with Organ Mouse) and Tux.

They have yet to migrate to my job.


Rob


---
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of IBNet
Plc. 

This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
this e-mail from your system. 

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which
arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please
request a hard-copy version. 




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Niklas Nordebo wrote:
 On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 
 I have a solitary copy of a japanese netsuke depicting a cat.
 
 My machine is name 'neko', which is japanese for cat.

That's cute!  Do you have oneko installed to chase your mouse cursor as
well?

-Dom



Schroedingers Computer

2001-05-11 Thread Barbie

http://www.nature.com/nsu/010503/010503-6.html

So far, demonstrations of quantum computing have been limited to the most
rudimentary of calculations, involving only two or three bits of
information. 

I'm sure Damian could them straight on that one ;-P

Barbie





Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Mark Fowler

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:

 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

Hmm.  I usually have a technic lego bike (thanks secret santa.)  Also
floating around in my geek sphere at the moment is:

 - A wind up clockwork chick (as in 'chicken,' not as in 'woman')
 - Coffee Mug (extra large)  Empty Caffinated Mints boxes.
 - A Beach ball
 - A copy of 'e' and the 'bofh' books
 - Various O'Reilly books (mostly blue) and a Manning Book (the other one
   is on the main bookshelf)
 - A SPACED DVD, A copy of the 'Worms World Party' computer game.
 - A large card that has 'Horror' printed on one side and 'Beauty' on the
   other.
 - Simpsons' daily desk calendar
 - One arm of my chair (that I removed because it was annoying me and now
   use as a book holder)
 - Palms (multiple,) Laptop, flash memory and other computer
   hardware items (such as a PCMICA network card that I borrowed off of
   leon and then never returned.)

At home on top of my monitor is a Mars Bar that I was presented for
'putting up the most from another perl monger while they were in another
country' (I don't eat chocolate.)

Later.

Mark.





Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:48:40PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
 Philip Newton wrote:
  I generally bring one of my small stuffed toys to work
  ^
  or my wife's. She has me than I.

Eeek, I have more than my SO and I am wondering if in fact my population
of small giraffes is diminishing...

-Dom (suspicious)



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Barbie

Currently just Tux, who thankfully doesn't get used as Nerf gun target
practice since leaving tw2.

Barbie.





Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dean

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:33:42PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

A dust puppy fluffy toy, a copy of Network Progamming with Perl and a flock
of post it notes.

 monitor type=flatscreen
 None ;-)
 /

monitor type=21inch deskspace=minimal /

Dean
-- 
Profanity is the one language all programmers understand
   --- Anon



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:59:13PM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote:
 From: Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:22 PM
 
  How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 
 Here - none (not sure why my mini-Tux never made it to Acxiom)
 At home - many things. But boring things like network hubs or CD backups or
 boot disks. And occasionally a (real) cat.

You heard that's how sleepycat software got their name - it was the
first thing that they saw when they looked around their office.  :-)

-Dom



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Niklas Nordebo

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  My machine is name 'neko', which is japanese for cat.
 
 That's cute!  Do you have oneko installed to chase your mouse cursor as
 well?

I do now :)

Hadn't thought of it, of course I should have a copy of neko installed on
neko.

-- 
Niklas Nordebo -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +447966251290
 The day is seven hours and fifteen minutes old, and already it's
crippled with the weight of my evasions, deceit, and downright lies



RE: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Simon Batistoni


 Has anyone got a proper lundun map with tube lines indicated... that would
 be just chops.

just posted to the crisps list,

http://www.sitw.f2s.com/london/maps/geog.gif

It's not a proper london map, and the resolution is terrible, but I'm sure a
grafix wizard could do an overlay job




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:

 On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:33:42PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
  On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 
   How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
  monitor type=flatscreen
  None ;-)
  /

 Boring!  You should be able to manage some clip on furry animals.

A cow-orker did selotape a sympathetic Wildlife bar to the screen, but
she's not very computer savvy and I had to put it in the DNA fridge to
un-thaw.  I have a furry orangutan climbing an inflatable Big Ben.


L.
Cambridge Beer Festival, 21-26 May, Jessus Green
www.camra.org.uk/cambridge




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Mike Wyer

Under and around my SGI flatscreen I have:

SGI Tux
waiyip Tux
beanie-baby penguin
fluffy dust-puppy
wooden camel (known as YouBastard after Pratchett)
fluffy santa
beanie-baby monkey
BB squid (it's a sex thing)
fluffy octopus (aka Admiral Akbar)
plush baloo
Extreme Networks flag
Extreme baseball cap and t-shirt
Lara Croft t-shirt
Veritas baseball cap
Cowboy hat

Cheers,
Mike
-- 
Mike Wyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Woof?
http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~mw ||  Gaspode the Wonder Dog
Work:  +44 020 7594 8440||
Mobile: +44 07879 697119||  ICQ: 43922064




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Fri, 11 May 2001, Philip Newton wrote:

 Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

 Depends on the day. Today, two things: a goose called Lucy[1]

!


L.
Blessed are the cheesegraters.




Re: (OT) constrained walk

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Fri, 11 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:

 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Chris Heathcote wrote:

  Has anyone got a proper lundun map with tube lines indicated... that would
  be just chops.
 There are machines in the tube that sell them.

I have a large collection of these due to always forgetting to take mine
with me whenever I go to Nodnol and having to buy another one.


L.
This cheese intentionally left rank.




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam



On Fri, 11 May 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:

 (I don't eat chocolate.)

*shock*


L.
Do spiders make gravy...?




101 uses for an inflatable Tux

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Fri, 11 May 2001, Barbie wrote:

 Currently just Tux, who thankfully doesn't get used as Nerf gun target
 practice since leaving tw2.

Heh.  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~siona/captions/january.html


L.
Cambridge Beer Festival, yadda yadda yadda.




Re: see attachment

2001-05-11 Thread Alex Page

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 10:06:52PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:

 well i had 15 minutes to spare so i decided to do this ...

Right, so who's going to write a script that parses all of
the london.pm traffic and tells us what we need to drink?

Alex, what, *read* the bloody thing?
-- 
I ask for so little. Just let me rule you, and you
 can have everything that you want. - Jareth, Labyrinth



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Dominic Mitchell

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:15:56PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
  (I don't eat chocolate.)
 
 *shock*

It's not strictly necessary, as you still get the kinder egg toys...

-Dom



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:

 On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:15:56PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
  On Fri, 11 May 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
   (I don't eat chocolate.)
 
  *shock*

So you buy them anyway and give the chocolate away...


L.
Can I be your new best friend?




Re: Buffy musings ...

2001-05-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On Wed, 9 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:

 And while we are on the old films chestnut, my current
 recommendation is 'O Brother, where art thou?', excellent film.
Oh yes. Truly fantastic. Must buy the soundtrack album.
   ah yes, and the soggy bottom boys' `hit' is particularly good
  Ye-es, but gets slightly annnoying when youre lab colleague plays it
  repeatedly while dancing round with DNA.

 do they do lots of foot stamping?

He's an Aussie, so he might do.


L.




Re: 101 uses for an inflatable Tux

2001-05-11 Thread Martin Ling

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:18:14PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
 
 
 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Barbie wrote:
 
  Currently just Tux, who thankfully doesn't get used as Nerf gun target
  practice since leaving tw2.
 
 Heh.  http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~siona/captions/january.html

Suggestions also welcome for all of these:

http://pkl.net/~martin/lonix-2001-05-10/


Martin



Fwd: YAPC::Europe reminders, and requests for help (fwd)

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Cross


FYI, Ann is one of the Y::E committee this year.

Dave...

Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 13:13:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ann Barcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YAPC::Europe reminders, and requests for help (fwd)

You talked about giving London.pm a push.  I figured I'd send you the
letter I just sent Amsterdam.pm...maybe some parts of it can be re-used.

Atm we're short on both full-length and lightning talks.

Ann

-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 12:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ann Barcomb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Amsterdam PM mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: YAPC::Europe reminders, and requests for help

I just wanted to remind everyone that the deadline for speech proposals
for YAPC::Europe is in less than 3 weeks, on 1 June.

If you hadn't really thought about giving a speech because you don't think
you could fill the entire time, or you're worried about speaking, consider
giving a lightning talk.  With only 5 minutes of time to fill, you could
probably compose your speech during the conference!  Just send a title
and 1 line about the topic to [EMAIL PROTECTED].  Or just mail
if you can commit to giving a lightning talk, even if you haven't thought
of a topic yet.

We're still looking for sponsors.  If you know of companies that might
be willing to sponsor the conference, mail Jouke [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Publicity is another area where we could use help.  Suggestions and
contacts for flyer distribution (such as at other conferences, meetings,
etc) can be sent to me.

Thanks,
Ann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
http://www.dave.org.uk  SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

plugData Munging with Perl http://www.manning.com/cross//plug




Re: putting escape characters in files

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Benson

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:14:08AM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
 On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
   Dominic Mitchell wrote:
assuming you can get into a bourne shell, you can
still do things like write cat(1) in sh, as well.
   This is not going to help you pause output.
Although it'd be hard to control without ^S and ^Q,
   ...which was what the original post was all about.
  No, you'd need the maths operators that came with later shells, so you
  could work out lines.  Dammit, I'm going to have to write shmore now.
  #!/bin/sh
  lineno=1
  while read line
  do
  lineno=$((lineno+1))
  if [ $(($lineno % 24)) = 0 ] ; then
  echo -n  -- more -- 
  read ans /dev/tty
  test $ans = q  exit 0
  fi
  done
 
 That breaks if the line is longer than the width of your screen.

   echo $line
---
   echo `echo $line | dd bs=79 count=1 2/dev/null`

-- 
Chris Benson
P.S. Why are we doing this in sh(1)??



Re: Schroedingers Computer

2001-05-11 Thread Robin Houston

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:55:47PM +0100, Barbie wrote:
 So far, demonstrations of quantum computing have been limited to the most
 rudimentary of calculations, involving only two or three bits of
 information. 
 
 I'm sure Damian could them straight on that one ;-P

Hmm, I think Damian's module ought to be called
Classical::NonDeterminism. Lovely though it is,
it's (theoretically) more powerful than quantum
computers are known to be...

 .robin.

-- 
A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal--Panama!
--Guy Jacobson



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Neil Ford

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 
 -Dom
 
Zero but then things don't really sit too well on the powerbook's lcd or
on the 15 lcd I've got :-)

Neil.
-- 
Neil C. Ford
Managing Director, Yet Another Computer Solutions Company Limited
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.yacsc.com



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Stowe

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:

 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?


Er, none this is a laptop :) I did have a wooden camel on top of the old
desktop machine but this is now on top of the telly.

/J\




Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Alex Gough

On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote:

 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 
 -Dom
 
Time enough for a delurking...

1 Frog (green, flat, catbeaten)
1 Dinosaur (brown, with pointy horns and tail)
1 Dinosaur (those wooden skeletons (you'd not imagine the trouble I had
trying to buy this...))

And, tied to the ceiling above the monitor, a 35p flying dinosaur which
waves in the thermals.

Alex Gough
-- 
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but
it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.





Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Matthew Robinson

From: Robert Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: RE: Monitors


  
  How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
  
 
 Currently none.
 
 But at Torrington I had 8 items ( I think ) including marzipan models of
 Bagpuss (complete with Organ Mouse) and Tux.
 
 They have yet to migrate to my job.

That's because they were sold off in the Torrington sale of assets.

Matt






Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Makepeace

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

Five CommTech Star Wars figures -- the type that have a chip with a
few voice samples in their base which the reader scans  plays. Some
of them have defined sequences so placing one figure after another
on the reader results in a conversation. Very silly!

Paul, who will now drop by toy shops that are in clearance-mode more often

PS My 3rd 21 monitor is in the mail, muhaha. Sony F520 for $850, hee :)



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Simon Cozens

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
 How many things do you have on top of your monitor?

Nothing. If your monitor cost as much as mine, you'd keep it sacrosanct
too.

-- 
SM is fun.  ADSM is not.
Safe, Sane, Consensual... three words that cannot used to describe
ADSM.
- Graham Reed, sdm.



Re: Monitors

2001-05-11 Thread Paul Makepeace

On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:46:11AM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
 On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
  How many things do you have on top of your monitor?
 
 Nothing. If your monitor cost as much as mine, you'd keep it sacrosanct
 too.

All this says is you don't have enough money to buy a decent monitor
every few months. Ah, to be kept in the lifestyle to which one so
easily becomes accustomed...

Sell the gold cat!

Paul



Re: Schroedingers Computer

2001-05-11 Thread Steve Mynott

Barbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 http://www.nature.com/nsu/010503/010503-6.html
 
 So far, demonstrations of quantum computing have been limited to the most
 rudimentary of calculations, involving only two or three bits of
 information. 
 
 I'm sure Damian could them straight on that one ;-P

And there was a demonstration of a 7 qubit computer last year!

-- 
1024/D9C69DF9 steve mynott [EMAIL PROTECTED]

i gained nothing at all from supreme enlightenment, and for that very
reason it is called supreme enlightenment.  -- gotama buddha