We're so popular!
At the official February monthly meeting (i.e. not the McCarroll
heretics meeting) we'll be graced with the presence of Mark-Jason
Dominus.
Dave...
--
http://www.dave.org.uk | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plugData Munging with Perl
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:00:39PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
i think the real question (not specifically about h2g2) is what happened to
cost/benefit analysis (and i'm talking about benefit to the profit sheet
not some imaginary paper money IPO value)?
Also know as the first rule of
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 03:25:02PM +, Neil Ford wrote:
I'd re-launch Surrey.pm and hold meetings in Guildford if I thought
there'd be anyone there but me... :-(=
Nat and I would probably come... but then I suspect the conversation
Simon Batistoni wrote:
I quote:
"A majority of Websites that incorporate user interaction and
personalization rely on PHP"
^^
Surely to be in context ..
"A majority of Websites that incorporate user interaction and
personalization rely on PHP to demonstrate the crappiness of
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:05:47PM -, Simon Batistoni wrote:
I quote:
"A majority of Websites that incorporate user interaction and
personalization rely on PHP"
^^
I'm getting a strong feeling of deja-vu, pointing back to the survey of used
modules.
Of course it's interesting
Ok, we are not (void) but we are pretty close so here is a one liner that
hopefully will provote discussion
the only thing that gives potential for the marketing of a language is the
projects that are achieved using it and java has a hell of a lot more cool
projects than perl
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:12:37PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
Ok, we are not (void) but we are pretty close so here is a one liner that
hopefully will provote discussion
the only thing that gives potential for the marketing of a language is the
projects that are achieved using it and
-Original Message-
From: Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg are you trolling? If so let me play ;)
the only thing that gives potential for the marketing of a language
is the
projects that are achieved using it and java has a hell of a lot
more cool
projects than perl
What are
-Original Message-
From: Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, we are not (void) but we are pretty close so here is a one liner
that
hopefully will provote discussion
I left (void) and you'l not take me back alive! Outlook canne take the
strain!
the only thing that gives
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Dean S Wilson wrote:
I left (void) and you'l not take me back alive! Outlook canne take the
strain!
i think london.pm is busier than (void) nowadays, a lot of the
thought-provoking people left
--
Snack pastries are dramatic when shapes are combined
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, Dean S Wilson wrote:
I agree but I also think that this is one of the problems, the only
people who see the modules are other perl coders.
indeed. there are few end-user perl apps.
in my eyes Perl is not particularly good for programs written by one
person, or in small
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:12:37PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote:
the only thing that gives potential for the marketing of a language is the
projects that are achieved using it and java has a hell of a lot more cool
projects than perl
I've been playing with Akopia ne' MiniVend/Tallyman which
12 matches
Mail list logo