Buffy

2001-04-01 Thread Leon Brocard
http://www.astray.com/Buffy/ Leon ps if only PAUSE weren't down, this'd be on CPAN already... -- Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/ yapc::Europehttp://yapc.org/Europe/ ... An unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys NAME

CGI .. its out to get me ...

2001-04-01 Thread Robin Szemeti
OK girls .. why does this .. do this? [submit form with parameter init_login='Login' my($q)=CGI-new; ... if ( defined($q-param('init_login')) ){ #do someting and it happens } ... some code goes by if ( defined($q-param('init_login')) ){ #do someting and it DOESNT happen } now .. you

Re: Buffy

2001-04-01 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, you wrote: http://www.astray.com/Buffy/ Leon ps if only PAUSE weren't down, this'd be on CPAN already... was there not a recent thread regarding a module on CPAN and someone said somehting along the lines of ' we need review of modules before they get onto CPAN...'

Re: Buffy

2001-04-01 Thread Leon Brocard
Robin Szemeti sent the following bits through the ether: was there not a recent thread regarding a module on CPAN and someone said somehting along the lines of ' we need review of modules before they get onto CPAN...' :) OKOK, and you'd have a "joke" category, into which silly things such as

[schwern@pobox.com: DNA.pm]

2001-04-01 Thread Leon Brocard
Those crazy Americans! ;-) - Forwarded message from Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DNA.pm To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:17:23 +0100 Not to be outdone by the Brits (see Leon's Buffy.pm

Re: CGI .. its out to get me ...

2001-04-01 Thread rob
Robin Szemeti wrote: OK girls .. ... [submit form with parameter init_login='Login' my($q)=CGI-new; ... if ( defined($q-param('init_login')) ){ #do someting and it happens } ... some code goes by if ( defined($q-param('init_login')) ){ #do someting and it DOESNT happen } now .. you are

Re: Buffy

2001-04-01 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Robin Szemeti sent the following bits through the ether: was there not a recent thread regarding a module on CPAN and someone said somehting along the lines of ' we need review of modules before they get onto CPAN...' :) OKOK, and you'd have a

Re: [schwern@pobox.com: DNA.pm]

2001-04-01 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Leon Brocard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Those crazy Americans! ;-) Now all we need is Mutator that can de-DNA code, parse the perl, change it in subtle ways and then re-DNA it. Actually, i'm quite pleased Leon implemented Buffy.pm and took up the namespace before we started inventing

Re: [schwern@pobox.com: DNA.pm]

2001-04-01 Thread David H. Adler
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 06:50:48PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: Those crazy Americans! ;-) Hey, he never did this before he went over to Britain... :-) -- David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ for (('to you', 'dear '.shift)[0,0,1,0]) { print "Happy birthday $_" }

Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

2001-04-01 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:41:14PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: host(1)'s error messages are often misleading - it can give the message "try again" to nxdomain responses, for example... Given how fast .NSI namespace is being eaten up, that

Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

2001-04-01 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote: agreed it is a dumb thing, especially if your nameserver doesnt have a name to lookup Erm!!?!? How exactly were you planning to point anything at it? an NS RR requires an authoritative name as it's RHS. MBM -- Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: [EMAIL

Re: CGI .. its out to get me ...

2001-04-01 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, you wrote: First question - is the second if statement in a separate block? Second question - is your server using mod_perl? nope ... not yet, but thats the intention. If the answer to both those questions is yes, then mod_perl is doing something nasty with closures

Wavelan

2001-04-01 Thread Robin Szemeti
Anybody care to suggest a decent purveyor of the Lucent Wavelan cards?? My new laptop has declared itself unwilling to be shackled by network cables and demands a nice Wavelan card If the decent purveyor of cards was also a cheap purveyor as well that would be a bonus. My search of the

pix of legend?

2001-04-01 Thread Aaron Trevena
do we still have the pictures from the night of award winning drunkeness? I'sd d certainly be interested at having another look. Also the website has a few gaps picture wise.. did nobody bring a camera on that many times? btw the trophy cabinet will get done once I have a job again. A. --

Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

2001-04-01 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, you wrote: On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Robin Szemeti wrote: agreed it is a dumb thing, especially if your nameserver doesnt have a name to lookup Erm!!?!? How exactly were you planning to point anything at it? an NS RR requires an authoritative name as it's RHS. if its

Re: Wavelan

2001-04-01 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, you wrote: On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:14:22PM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: Anybody care to suggest a decent purveyor of the Lucent Wavelan cards?? My two recommended suppliers are; http;//www.compconnect.co.uk web http://www.freebsd-services.co.uk ta muchly .. off to