snip type=inevitable love/hate circular debate/
I was going to stay quiet on this one (still don't know why I am now joining
in).
I am finding XSLT XML to be a good alternative to normal templating
techniques. One of the biggest benifits I've found is being able to generate
the one data set
From: Leo Lapworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
XML - do it because you need it, not because of the Buzz.
Amen.
I'm also trying to future proof the system slightly - I think that by
having the data XML based it may make it easier to use in new and
wonderful ways in the future, without
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not very perlish I'm afraid.
a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).
b) That makes it an appropriate topic for this list.
Ian
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from
Hi guys,
Thanks for the input. I'll investigate further, but it has confirmed my
suspicions that SQueaL hasn't made an impact at the terabyte level.
As for the job, it's good, but not the be-all and end-all. I'm too
passionate about what I do to work on systems that I don't believe in.
Hi guys,
Have any of you worked with SQueaLServer with a large DB (multiple terabyte
level), serving high volume transactions (read write, of the order of
millions of records a day). What sort of performance did you get? What was
the hardware? Was it reliable?
I'm working for a telecoms
Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2001, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
I'm working for a telecoms company that is considering a proposal to
move its billing system from Oracle on Solaris, to SQueaLServer NT.
It's a decision that is coming from management (where else?), and I'm
Leon Brocard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Redvers Davies sent the following bits through the ether:
The transactions world record sadly is held by M$ at the moment.
http://www.tpc.org/tpch/results/h-ttperf.idc
Yeah, seen that. It's interesting to note that SQueaL doesn't make an
appearance at
will [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote something that looked like the following:
Apparently it is Craig 'Red Dwarf' Charles's regular and he was
there a few weeks ago when we were there. Not as pretty as Buffy or
Willow about as close as you can get (sort of).
I saw Craig Charles at the Melbourne Comedy
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 01:32:24PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
Ian Brayshaw wrote:
it's the internal workings of require that stop the tie
from being honoured. I presume that the require burrows
down into the internals and isn't aware that it's a tie'd
handle. As far as I can tell
From: Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So whats wrong with StatInc ?
OK, so StatINC will reload the module if the module source has changed.
However, it's the handler I am pushing onto @INC that will generate the
module source from a configuration file. If the configuration file changes,
Robin Houston wrote:
snip/
In earlier perls, you'll need to make a tied filehandle:
Thanks Robin. The TrueHandle package is essentially what I had implemented,
but it's the internal workings of require that stop the tie from being
honoured. I presume that the require burrows down into the
Hi,
Sorry to pollute this list with a question about Perl...
I am writing a customer handler for loading modules at runtime, taking
advantage of the support for coderefs in the @INC array. By deleting entries
in the %INC hash for loaded modules I can force Perl to recompile the module
after
Dave Cantrell wrote:
Hmmm ... if 'not working at all' is the same as 'not bad'. All I
get is the title image.
Got to love badly formed HTML (probably a missing /table tag or two). ...
And I thought he was an "master". ... Oops, sorry, that was only in "PERL",
not HTML.
(... Mind you, it all
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/streetmap.dll?G2M?X=533817Y=182479A=YZ=1
Thanks Jo.
Ian
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Just wondering what it was like in the UK right now.
snip
... what the overall feel of the market is right now whether people
are knifing coming in and out of interviews or if it's pretty easy
to find IT work, etc.
It seems to be quite strong, but definitely not as buoyant as it was. A
number
Dave Cross wrote:
At Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:37:51 + (GMT), Mark Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
L. said:
World domination is ours. Muahahaha!
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script
archive it won't be.
Ideas to the usual address.
*Please*
I thought
Hi,
Given the following lvalue subroutine
sub mysub : lvalue {
$value;
}
is there any way for mysub() to be able to determine that it
was called in an lvalue context?
Ian (New face on london-pm: usually wears an over-the-top suit.)
Ian Brayshaw" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Given the following lvalue subroutine
sub mysub : lvalue {
$value;
}
is there any way for mysub() to be able to determine that it
was called in an lvalue context?
No. If you need to know that sort of thing
Robin Houston wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:38:40PM +1100, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
I'm new to the discussion of Perl6, so are there any discussions
around providing operators such as wantlvalue and wantvoid
to perform similar queries to wantarray?
Yes. Damian has proposed
http
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 10:50:26PM +1100, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
Given the following lvalue subroutine
sub mysub : lvalue {
$value;
}
is there any way for mysub() to be able to determine that it
was called in an lvalue context?
Yeah there is, but you're not going
Is there any benchmarking available of salary bands for
differing skills,
i.e. are perl guys much more than ASP guys who can also do
the other bits ?
Any other arguments I should be making !
Yeah, Perl people cost more than ASP people and they're frickin
impossible to find, and vary
21 matches
Mail list logo