So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Mine will have emmigrated by then, so no. If anything goes wrong, then
yes.
Beware, it's in Flash (or Shockwave)
http://www.electrotank.com/lab/minigolf.html
Hole 17 is a bugger
c.
--
every day, computers are making people easier to use
http://www.unorthodoxstyles.com
i'm not a great fan of people sending URLs randomly, but this has
to be an exception, remember the joy of your childhood years reading
the guiness book of records (and watching record breakers as well,
with Roy, Norris and later on Cheryl). well you can relive that joy
at
So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Some of us can't afford YAPC. And some of us don't have partners :-(
L.
Life is pain, Highness! Anyone who says otherwise is selling something.
* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Some of us can't afford YAPC.
Well at least its not due to the entry fee and if its a matter
of accomodation cost, ask on the list for somewhere to crash.
And some of us don't have
Well at least its not due to the entry fee and if its a matter
of accomodation cost, ask on the list for somewhere to crash.
Plane tickets are currently 37 quid return via easyjet...
Thats why you should come to YAPC::Europe and meet the monger
of your dreams ;-)
Indeed... see them in
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
It had been my intention for the whole Gellyfish Clan to venture forth to
Amsterdam but it looks like I will be the only representative now as the
leader has decided that she has been to
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Philip Newton wrote:
Redvers Davies wrote:
The Bilderberg Garden Hotel. lastmin.com do bookings for it.
Wow. Either you have more money than you know what to do with or your
company allows for higher expenses than mine. www.lastminute.com says GBP
82.90 - GBP 126.46;
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
this is the final test
No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league.
L.
I've got a touch of the singles. Shingles? No, singles.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Lucy McWilliam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Some of us can't afford YAPC.
Well at least its not due to the entry fee and if its a matter
of accomodation cost, ask on the list for somewhere to crash.
Ah, well. Have made prior arrangemnets now
* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It had been my intention for the whole Gellyfish Clan to venture forth to
Amsterdam but it looks like I will be the only representative now as the
leader has decided that she has been to Amsterdam too many times
previously to justify the cost and
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:46:56PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
So how many people are bringing partners to YAPC::Europe?
Some of us can't afford YAPC. And some of us don't have partners :-(
maybe we could have Yet Another Beer :: London at the same time then.
--
David Cantrell |
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
Some of us can't afford YAPC. And some of us don't have partners :-(
maybe we could have Yet Another Beer :: London at the same time then.
Sounds eminently doable ;-)
L.
I have no sig
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It had been my intention for the whole Gellyfish Clan to venture forth to
Amsterdam but it looks like I will be the only representative now as the
leader has
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Simon.
At 07:14 AM 2001.06.13 +0100, Chris Benson wrote:
I need to read the news more often, I was thinking about Louisiana!
I also need to get a better grip of the geography: I thought
LA. was the Florida side of Mississippi and Alabama.
No, it's the place where I was born -- Lower Alabama. Also
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Grumble grumble.
At least they only
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:37:19PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
If on the other hand you want the dev team, I'm sure Barbie and I
*cough*
oh hang on, do I really want to be associated with the bastards?
could figure something to tell you for the right amount of beer.
that settles it, yes.
Quoting Richard Clamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
At least they only claim to be the maintenance team. Almost like
boasting about being the team sent in to fetch the team sent in to
rescue the hostages.
Hang on, that still sounds like the original team needed to be rescued.
I'd change that
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :)
personal hygiene? ;)
So that's why you never come home anymore...
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :)
personal hygiene? ;)
So that's why you never come home anymore...
I'm sorry. I didn't want you to find
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
--
simon wistowwireless systems coder
only second toughest
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y'know?
--
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:44:11AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Are there any of you lot still looking for jobs?
Still open? I think I might have someone for you.
--
If you give a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire,
he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away...
Shame.
L.
Beer good.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
beer : no beer
--
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the twenty-first weekly summary of the London Perl Mongers
mailing list. This is brought to you from yapc::NorthAmerica during
Brian Ingerson's CPAN, PPM and the Future talk. For the quiet week
starting 2001-06-04:
Don't forget the London.pm website for meetings etc. The next meeting
is
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
Beer Foamy.
--
s'' Mark Fowler London.pm Bath.pm
http://www.twoshortplanks.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
';use Term'Cap;$t=Tgetent Term'Cap{};print$t-Tputs(cl);for$w(split/ +/
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
Beer Foamy.
Only when you add bubble bath...
L.
A young, female, non-bearded, non-jumpered members of CAMRA? *shock*
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just
From: Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I
From: Lucy McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beer good.
But Guinness is better ;)
Barbie
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
In other news: Microsoft SQL Server sucking (SQueaL), Sun Ultra
Enterprise 1, google++, the Sony Clie being small and cute,
checking out pubs for the next meet, buffy, search.cpan.org being
hacked (Catalog module apparently),
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y'know?
There
I spotted a bug in Tie::Hash::Rank, which would break the DELETE and EXISTS
methods. It's fixed in v 1.0.1 which is winging its way to CPAN as we speak.
Oops.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
Good advice is always certain to be ignored,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they
It's all been pretty civilised over on the Cookwook board recently which has
made a nice change. I suspect it might all kick off again tho' when bk sees
my response to his contribution to this thread:
http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?read=5205
Dave...
--
Drugs are just
I have managed to resist the temptation to join previous flame wars with bk
but I was feeling weak this time :(
Matt
--
s!msfQ!s$utvKs(Q)\1!sfiupoBs^reverse Ibdlfses^#
s$#!uojsqs(.)chr(ord($1)-1)ges(.*)reverse $1see
- Original Message -
From: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Go me! Tie::Hash::Transactional is written. It implements a hash which
you can checkpoint and rollback.
I'll put it on my website as soon as my victim^Wlovely volunteer tester
has had a chance to play with it.
It was disgustingly easy to write - took about an hour, most of which was
writing
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if they
said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we really want
to associate with the buggers?
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 1:16:12 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Larry speaks in a bit over 9 hours. Yippee!
DC Actually - he doesn't :)
DC http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/12/2255236
It all worked out ok.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Barbie [easynet] wrote:
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
said they
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:44:11AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Are there any of you lot still looking for jobs?
Still open? I think I might have someone for you.
I was fishing on behalf of a client who may well need a perl linux
person in the
From: Robin Szemeti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2001 03:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: downloady filenames
ISTR somebody explaing the magic incantations you could put after
Content-type: text/some-funny-application
in order for the browser to try and save it as
From: Chris Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why, when the sun is shining (almost) and there is a popular (?) govt.
do I feel like I did in early/mid 70's: like the end of the
world was nigh?
Hmm, not sure... but is the feeling helped buy having someone in the White
House who has no real
From: Paul Makepeace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
PS -- that is one truly obnoxiously big sig.
I apologise profusely for my employers lawyers need to avoid any form of
litigation due to something that I may or may not say to the right or wrong
person while sending an email which may or may not
This in the Opera (browser) Newsletter I received yesterday:
* Opera challenges UK govt to support standards *
The British government's prestigious gateway
Robert Thompson wrote:
I apologise profusely
Sorry, you'll have to give me a hardcopy version of that before I'll believe
you:
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Robert Thompson wrote:
From: Robin Szemeti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 June 2001 03:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: downloady filenames
ISTR somebody explaing the magic incantations you could put after
Content-type: text/some-funny-application
On or about Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:10:32AM +0100, Robin Szemeti typed:
someone somewhere a few weeks ago posted something about an extra line
you could put not dissimilar to 'Apparent-filename: something.xyz' .. its
not so much a mime types thing but a browser thing ..
Content-Disposition.
R
This seemed to work.
print Content-type:application/whatever\n.Content-Disposition:
attachment; filename=$file\n\n
Thanks
Jon
*
Jon Galliers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer Perl/C++/MySQL/DB2/Java
Design Net http://www.design.net.uk
Isn't there some cough/ perl module that might allow us to rig a
sig-stripper to be installed at dircon? Where sig = any trailer that has
more than four un-para'ed lines. Or give these people a damn shell
account. Or SOMETHING.
(Actually I don't really care I just got carried away with the
* at 11/06 21:38 +0100 Robin Szemeti said:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
Didn't ukonline.co.uk complain about trademark infringement a while back?
Is gateway.gov.uk the result? and is there any possible trademark confusion
with this address?
ring ring
'hello .. is
Dominic Mitchell sent the following bits through the ether:
I think the python scheme of creating a bytecode file on the first run
is better, but I'm not sure how amenable perl's code tree is to being
flattened and restored (this may be why we haven't seen a perl-java
compiler).
ByteCache -
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
And you'd have to make the daemon threaded, or end up running multiple
pre-forking daemons to do the job. At which point, you're only saving
the fork time and the parse time, which depending on how much effort it
is to complete the above, may not be much of a saving
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:31:44AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
And you'd have to make the daemon threaded, or end up running multiple
pre-forking daemons to do the job. At which point, you're only saving
the fork time and the parse time, which depending on how
I see that registration for YAPC::Europe has opened.
http://www.yapc.org/Europe/registration.html
They've also accepted both my Perl for the People and Creating Data
Output Files Using the Template Toolkit talks :)
Dave...
--
The information contained in this communication is
European Yet Another Perl Conference
YAPC::Europe-2.0.01
http://www.yapc.org/Europe/
Thursday-Saturday, August 2-4, 2001 at the Hogeschool Holland,
Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Yet
Since I've changed my mail setup I've had a bit of a problem with resending
the bounced mails - hopefully this will prove that I fixed it :)
You shouldnt be seeing any spurious [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: headers in this
...
/J\
--
Jonathan Stowe
Analyst/Programmer
Netscalibur UK
Tel: 0870 887
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Peter Haworth
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Can someone please remind me about the technical meeting on the 21st? Now
that it looks like I might be in London at the time, I find I've deleted
all
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your
passport, we'll even let you south of the river and my sofa is very
comfortable and has a well-stocked
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your
passport, we'll even let you south
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way around that. If you bring your
passport, we'll even let you south
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:40:44PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this is because you don't have somewhere to stay on the Thursday night,
I'm sure we can collectively find a way
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
It's a TRAP!
You been playing wy too much nethack recently.
That was a tough level with comfy sofa and the drinks cabinet.
--
Dave Hodgkinson,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:26:08 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Peter Haworth wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:14:41 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
Well, er..., there will be a meeting on the 21st. I spoke to Alex last
night and he said we could hold it at
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 05:18:43PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 04:28:14PM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
It's a TRAP!
You been playing wy too much nethack recently.
That was a tough level with comfy sofa and
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:57:51AM +0100, Cross David - dcross wrote:
I see that registration for YAPC::Europe has opened.
http://www.yapc.org/Europe/registration.html
They've also accepted both my Perl for the People and Creating Data
Output Files Using the Template Toolkit talks :)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote:
So who's registered then? ;-)
I have, now to write[0] the talks.
[0] always with the writing!
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:15:36AM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote:
From: Chris Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why, when the sun is shining (almost) and there is a popular (?) govt.
do I feel like I did in early/mid 70's: like the end of the
world was nigh?
Hmm, not sure... but is
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jon Galliers wrote:
This seemed to work.
print Content-type:application/whatever\n.Content-Disposition:
attachment; filename=$file\n\n
yadda! .. thats the cookie! ..
a thousand thanks ;)
right I can stop my cvs files coming up as .'something.pl' now ...
ta muchly.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:55:38PM +0100, Chris Benson wrote:
Oh yes, I vaguely thought on reading about the floods in The South
that maybe this was supposed to be a message like Repent your sins or
I wash you off the face of the Earth.
I think it's more along the lines of the Creator(s)
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 07:41:48PM +0100, Neil Ford wrote:
So who's registered then? ;-)
I have, now to write[0] the talks.
I got lucky. They didn't want the Perl Proverbs talk (which I'd have
to write), but they did want 12 step (which I busk).
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
Somebody tell me why this is a stupid idea because I can't think of any
obvious reason but if there wasn't then I'm sure sombody would have
already done it [0] ...
Similar principle to mod_perl, a perl script is run but instead of a
normal
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:54:01PM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
is this anything like wot FastCGI does .. or is that summat different?
Since 'this' is a bit muddy I couldn't say, though I do know that
FastCGI works as a constantly running coprocess, so maybe
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got lucky. They didn't want the Perl Proverbs talk (which I'd have
to write), but they did want 12 step (which I busk). Result.
Busk... What a wonderful turn of phrase ;)
There's a couple of reasonable hex editors out there, but I usually just
tend to use M-x hexl-find-file in emacs. If you're a vim user, see
xxd(1).
or bvi (Binary vi)
Robin Szemeti [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
*
* What IS the mentality of idiots who attack community sites
* like this?
*
*maybe it was just a script kiddie .. maybe it was a worm.
It wasn't anything quite so dignified. I had reinstalled the Catalog
module last month after a failed attempt to
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Chris Benson wrote:
I know a state-of-emergency (or whatever) has been called
to right it has, as I understand it this means now that you are supposed
to drive a 5.3L V8 rather than the 7.1L V8 unless absolutlely necessary
...
oops .. read 358cubic inch and 427ci ... these
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
And, as far as the idiots go, I doubt there are any fewer today then there
were yesterday.
well .. my theory is:
they say 'theres one born every minute'.. but sometimes, due to
oversight, there isn't one born for a whole hour or so, so they
It has occured to me over the last year that several people have
proclaimed FreeBSD to be superior to Linux and vice versa. During these
debates no one has been able to give me convincing argument why one may
be better than the other ...
Today, someone sent me this link, which I believe makes a
Tuesday, June 12, 2001, 2:55:38 PM, Chris Benson wrote:
CB On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 08:15:36AM +0100, Robert Thompson wrote:
From: Chris Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Why, when the sun is shining (almost) and there is a popular (?) govt.
do I feel like I did in early/mid 70's: like
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Larry speaks in a bit over 9 hours. Yippee!
Actually - he doesn't :)
http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/12/2255236
Dave...
--
Drugs are just bad m'kay
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:10:28PM -0500, Mike Jarvis wrote:
Tuesday, June 12, 2001, 2:55:38 PM, Chris Benson wrote:
CB I wash you off the face of the Earth. If so it missed Washington DC
CB by about a 1,000 miles and Texas by 500. It probably missed GWB by a
CB couple of light years.
At 00:23 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A reasonably reliable headhunter I've dealt with in the past is
looking for technical project managers for new web company. Let me
know if interested...
Hmm... I wonder if I could morph...
Come over to the
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Anyone got a link to this?
There's a working version of it here:
http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern/
And the thing that drives it (The Dada Engine) here:
http://dev.null.org/dadaengine/
Alex Gough
--
The Texan turned out to be good-natured,
At 18:51 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Monday morning
Precisely. And using Java et al is a discrimination against the mobility
impaired.
Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't
afford, don't have, morally object to, are too old to learn to use,
computers.
Sure,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:56:19AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
At 18:51 09/06/01 +0100, you wrote:
Monday morning
Precisely. And using Java et al is a discrimination against the mobility
impaired.
Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't
afford,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 05:40:38PM +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote:
Apologies in advance if I have missed something blindingly obvious :)
I need to change the default library paths in a compiled copy of perl.
Basically, I want to move /usr/lib/perl5 into /usr/local/lib/perl5. I am
unable to
From: Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not to mention the way it discriminates totally against people who can't
afford, don't have, morally object to, are too old to learn to use,
computers.
How come. It's an alternative to, not a replacement for, the usual paper
based forms; isn't it?
On 08/06/2001 at 12:30 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
... and some not so pretty pictures.
http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/2001-06-07/
Bah. Too many of me. And not enough of you here:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.
--
::
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 08/06/2001 at 12:30 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
... and some not so pretty pictures.
http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/2001-06-07/
Bah. Too many of me. And not enough of you here:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
Warning: dislike of flash
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:19:21AM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:56:19AM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
I haven't looked at the certificate issue, but most of the things I've
read so far state that it's only a problem because they've made it a
problem by using
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.
Very artistic. I think your camera was drunk (thank $deity - I don't get
on with them sober). Nice to meet you all. I'll be ba-ack.
L.
I love the smell of fruit flies in the morning.
On 11/06/2001 at 11:10 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/
But I may be biased.
Nah, they are nice. But you've been selective, I'm assuming (unless
you've just taken seven photos in your
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/06/2001 at 11:10 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://husk.org/perl/pics/
http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/
But I may be biased.
Nah, they are nice. But you've been selective,
Of course,
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not very perlish I'm afraid.
a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).
b) That makes it an appropriate topic for this list.
Ian
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from
On 11/06/2001 at 12:46 +0100, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not very perlish I'm afraid.
a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).
http://husk.org/lndn/circ/compat/DSCF0102.jpg
See, the advantages of posting everything.
--
:: paul
:: 'aggressive is
On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:44:40PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
Which reminds me of something I read in the PuTTY FAQ:
Question: Would you like me to register you a snappier domain
name? The PuTTY web page is hard to find.
Answer: No,
201 - 300 of 5078 matches
Mail list logo
