Re: sub BEGIN {}

2001-04-06 Thread pmh
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 09:08:09 +0100 (BST), Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Paul Makepeace wrote: Paul, whose uni got nicked in fscking cambridge. "Ooh, it's got a wheel! Not the usual two, but fuck it, let's steal it anyway!" Ah, but people so often have quick release front

RE: Grammar (was: Re: Linux.com Online Chat)

2001-04-06 Thread pmh
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:16:18 +0100, Matthew Jones wrote: I was at school from up to 1995 and grammer, hand writing and similar were only lightly touched upon. IT was another subject that we never actually did (other than read about spreadsheets leading to my adult hatred of Excel) and as

Re: Social Meeting (fwd)

2001-04-03 Thread pmh
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 20:59:01 +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: ... (A)bort (R)etry (P)ull leg (H)ot boot (S)wipe tagline! That's a clever way to stop people swiping them. Worked on me (damn!) -- Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Sudden death may occur without warning. Call a physician

Re: Still screwing up References: (was Re: Job: I'm looking for one..)

2001-03-29 Thread pmh
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:17:17 +0100 (BST), Mark Fowler wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote: You're right, the referencing is a bit screwed up. I'll take a look at it today. Actually, that message was OK. Your webmail CC is screwed up too. On my mails there's now new line after

Re: Perl Auto-RPC

2001-03-29 Thread pmh
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:37:38 -0800, Nathan Torkington wrote: Greg McCarroll wrote: sure it makes sense, but it still is CiP and trust me this isn't the only bit of CiP in here and much kudos to Paul for it ;-) I'm unsure what CiP is, but if it has anything to do with gnarliness, I know

Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

2001-03-26 Thread pmh
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 19:07:16 +, Dave Cross wrote: At 17:48 23/03/2001, you wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, you wrote: Well, I can make a guess at what the first number represents. Those expansion plans really are short-term. Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Put down

Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module.

2001-03-23 Thread pmh
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:46:07 +, Marty Pauley wrote: The interplanitary URL is sufficient for our short-term expansion plans. Unfortunatly the actual specification of the scheme is a millitary secret, but I can target your house with the following: ipbm://3/401392692/759227092/5 Well,

XML One London

2001-03-15 Thread pmh
Is anyone going to XML One London next week? I'll be there until Wednesday, but the Thursday didn't look any use to me. -- Peter Haworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Ok, print the message, then put it in your shoe and put your shoe in front of the fireplace... then wait till Santa come and

RE: Descrambling CSS w/ 7 Lines Of Perl

2001-03-08 Thread pmh
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:02:39 -0800, Simon Batistoni wrote: Anyway, the guy who originally posted the perl code to the web is archiving as many copies of DeCSS as he can get his hands on, going as far as the rock song which uses the code as the lyrics:

Re: Graphical Documentation

2001-03-06 Thread pmh
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001 10:40:35 + (GMT), Mark Fowler wrote: Oh, there seems to be something odd with that server set up. Because my copy of Gnome-Terminal does url catching I can Ctrl-Click on any url and it pops up in netscape. However, being a good url catcher it matches the '.' at the

Re: DMP Availability

2001-02-26 Thread pmh
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:51:08 +0100, Philip Newton wrote: I see your whois graffiti and raise you the domain where you can do a zone transfer, chop off the first bit, sort, MIME-decode and get a program. (Or something like that.) Unfortunately, I don't remember the domain. I think it was in

Re: DMP Availability

2001-02-23 Thread pmh
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:54:50 -0500 (EST), Dave Cross wrote: Unfortunately, as it's a very primitive webmail (written by me) it doesn't store the outgoing mails, so I can't see what I'm doing wrong. Why call it "ms-webmail"? Makes it sound like MicroSoft wrote it. Also, you're just copying

Re: DMP Availability

2001-02-23 Thread pmh
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:53:24 +, Dominic Mitchell wrote: JWZ has a good discussion on threading algorithms: http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html Thanks very much. From a quick skim, that looks somewhat similar to the scheme I've come up with through trial and error. However, I

Re: DMP Availability

2001-02-23 Thread pmh
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:01:31 -0500 (EST), Dave Cross wrote: At Fri, 23 Feb 11:50:37 2001 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:54:50 -0500 (EST), Dave Cross wrote: Unfortunately, as it's a very primitive webmail (written by me) it doesn't store the outgoing mails, so I

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary 2001-02-12

2001-02-16 Thread pmh
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:02:36 +, Leon Brocard wrote: And finally, dumrats used naughty words and got attacked by a daemon: http://www.mail-archive.com/london-pm%40lists.dircon.co.uk/msg02186.html Finally, due to this and other contextual clues, I've figured out who some of these IRC names

Re: the list

2001-02-01 Thread pmh
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:21:47 +, Dominic Mitchell wrote: On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:04:54PM +, Greg McCarroll wrote: everyone is probably reading up on ruby in preparation for it taking over the world Well, there's a good article on it in the "25th anniversary" Dr Dobbs magazine.