Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
BTW - I've just had some fun trying to uncompress a .zip
file on Linux! tar gzip and gunzip don't seem to want to
know. Guess that makes me a luser!
you need the unzip(1)
Which, according to its home page at
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
Robin Szemeti wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
BTW - I've just had some fun trying to uncompress a .zip
file on Linux! tar gzip and gunzip don't seem to want to
know. Guess that makes me a luser!
you need
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
Dominic Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:19:27PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
[unzip]
Which, according to its home page at
http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html , is "the
third most portable program
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Seems like we've made a reasonable start on this project. We already
have a few scripts written - anyone want to report progress on any
of
the others?
I have Guestbook, FFA and simple search all ready to for testing
elsewhere - I'll package and upload
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Stowe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Snip
* Bundling. Need to build gzipped tarballs of our new versions (I
guess
this should be built on top of the CVS stuff). Matt makes pkzipped
versions avaiable as well - so should
On the subject of having zip archives as well as tarballs on the server,
Gareth Harper said:
Winzip (what most windows users these days use to unzip) handlers tar.gz by
default so that may not be neccesary.
Not neccesary from a techical point of view. Neccesary from a social
point of view
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Shiels" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Stowe" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] sa
On Tue Mar 20 11:46:25 2001, Gareth Harper wrote:
On a completely off topic note I'm appealing to the contractors among you
here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set yourself up as a limited
company did/do
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
On Tue Mar 20 11:46:25 2001, Gareth Harper wrote:
On a completely off topic note I'm appealing to the contractors among you
here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Szemeti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
apart from that the benfits of running as a Limited Company are large
(ish) assumi
At 15:40 20/03/2001 +, Gareth Harper wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Szemeti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
apart from that the benfits
Marty Pauley writes:
On Tue Mar 20 11:46:25 2001, Gareth Harper wrote:
On a completely off topic note I'm appealing to the contractors among you
here. Those of you who have yor own company. Did you set yourselves up as
a Limited Company, or as a Sole Trader. If you set yourself up
Not neccesary from a techical point of view. Neccesary from a social
point of view (What's this extension! I don't understand!
What's going on!
Excewpt that windows machines tend not to even show the extension by
default, and so the file will just have a little WinZip icon[0], which
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Robin Szemeti" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
apart from that the benfits of running as
All this is pre-ir35:
as a employee of a limited company you would be paid national minimum
wage (4 quid an hour) .. you pay NIC and tax on that ... (minimal) .. you
claim expenses off the (ie your own) company for all the driving around
you do and having to buy things and accomodation whilst
At 04:07 PM 20.3.2001 +, you wrote:
Not neccesary from a techical point of view. Neccesary from a
social point of view (What's this extension! I don't understand!
What's going on!
Except that windows machines tend not to even show the extension by
default, and so the file will just
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
All this is pre-ir35:
as a employee of a limited company you would be paid national minimum
wage (4 quid an hour) .. you pay NIC and tax on that ... (minimal) .. you
claim expenses off the (ie your own) company for all the driving around
you do and having
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:43:08AM -0500, Chris Devers wrote:
...except that the Windows extension hiding feature only applies to files seen
through the normal filesystem tools (Windows Explorer, various dialog boxes, etc),
and not Internetty stuff. People might still be scared off by seeing
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no wish to do so. If someone is
scared by a .tar.gz
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no wish to
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Shiels" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
.tar.gz - wtf is that, why isn't there a zip file.
People keep misunderstanding this point: just because someon
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, you wrote:
BTW - I've just had some fun trying to uncompress a .zip file on Linux! tar
gzip and gunzip don't seem to want to know. Guess that makes me a luser!
you need the unzip(1)
NAMEunzip - list, test and extract compressed files in a ZI
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:48:25PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 05:38:09PM +, David Cantrell wrote:
Then they deserve to be hurt. Really. We can't possibly support
dribbling idiots, and frankly, I have no wish to
Seems like we've made a reasonable start on this project. We already
have a few scripts written - anyone want to report progress on any of
the others?
What we need now is to start to impose some structure on the project.
Here are a few ideas:
* CVS Repository (on Penderel?)
* Testing both
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
* Web page. Need somewhere to point potential users at. Probably two
versions - one for the developers and one for the users. This can be
a subdirectory on london.pm.org.
I don't mind doing this bit of it. I would quite like the idea of
creating a few
It has occured to us we need a decent name for this. Discussion on IRC
has concluded that:
a) It shouldn't mention Matt in the title.
b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
c) It should sound at least semi-professional[1].
But apart from that we've been useless
Later.
At 12:40 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
It has occured to us we need a decent name for this. Discussion on IRC
has concluded that:
a) It shouldn't mention Matt in the title.
So "Not the Matt Wright Archive" is out then ;-)
b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
How
At Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:27:57 + (GMT), jo walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* CVS Repository (on Penderel?)
i can sort this, perhaps with veeghelp.
for leon and marcel's aspect oriented programming project we started a
/home/projects directory, we could put the not-matt stuff in there
At 13:18 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
How about EasyScripts ? the domain name is available, anyway.
Not very perl, but I like it. Something similar though.
EasyPerlScripts or even
At 13:18 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
How about EasyScripts ? the domain name is available, anyway.
Not very perl, but I like it. Something similar though.
EasyPerlScripts
From: "Simon Wilcox" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2001 13:34
Subject: Re: Matt's Scripts Projects
At 13:18 19/03/2001 +, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Simon Wilcox wrote:
b) That is should have a name that appeals to newbies.
Chris Devers wrote:
Probably, as is "The Matt's Wrong Archive", which is probably far
too negative obvious anyway... ;)
But if Matt Sergeant put it up ...
At 14:59 19/03/2001 +, Simon Wistow wrote:
Chris Devers wrote:
Probably, as is "The Matt's Wrong Archive", which is probably far
too negative obvious anyway... ;)
But if Matt Sergeant put it up ...
... it would all be in XML ;-)
34 matches
Mail list logo
