No Subject
Oh my word, why *is* Nathan Barley on 18:23 from Cannon Street? /J\
Cult leaders (was: a subject line with no relevance to what was being discussed)
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:22:25PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote: Perhaps the difference between your set of leaders and mine, is that the ones you mentioned all had personality cults to a degree, although in the case of Churchill I wouldn't have said so. There certainly seems to be one around his memory now :-( And of the ones I listed, I would have thought de Gaulle was far weaker than Churchill in the personality-cult stakes. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ Rip, Mix, Burn, unless you're using our most advanced operating system in the world which we decided to release incomplete just for a laugh
No Subject
would people mind if i turned up totally pissed from minute 0 to tonights meeting? i've had lunch with a friend and its done bad things to me -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
No Subject
unsubscribe -- insert [sig] here -- --- The Totalise Email system, probably the most flexible email system in the world. To register for an account goto http://www.totalise.net
Suggestion - use of Subject: line
Just now there are two interesting discussions going on, one about Perl certification, the other about databases, under the subject 'Re: Job: I'm looking for one..", both of which forked off from the original discussion a long while back. Can one or preferably both sets of participants please change to a more apt subject line - normally discussions drifting from their original topic isn't that big a problem (I'm guilty as charged too), but when the list is as busy as it is just now, with two quite different discussions going by the same subject line, it'd be a big help for those trying to follow the conversation(s) if they could be differentiated by their subject lines! Go on, please ;-) Andrew. application/ms-tnef
Re: Suggestion - use of Subject: line
* Andrew Bowman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Just now there are two interesting discussions going on, one about Perl certification, the other about databases, under the subject 'Re: Job: I'm looking for one..", both of which forked off from the original discussion a long while back. i've already fixed this in my draft proposal posting however i now see that JP has also done it, so we will now have 2 threads with the same topic ;-) hurrah! -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
Re: Suggestion - use of Subject: line
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, you wrote: it'd be a big help for those trying to follow the conversation(s) if they could be differentiated by their subject lines! have you no sense of tradition ?? we've always done it this way :) .. we learnt the techniques on alt.sysadmin.recovery ... Go on, please ;-) oh .. alright then .. -- Robin Szemeti The box said "requires windows 95 or better" So I installed Linux!
No Subject
reminder - heretics meeting tommorow night, email me if you need directions or my mobile number -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
No Subject
is it still 12:30 at the new world today? -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
