Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Paul Mison

On 08/06/2001 at 12:30 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
... and some not so pretty pictures.

http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/2001-06-07/

Bah. Too many of me. And not enough of you here:

http://husk.org/perl/pics/

Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.

--
:: paul
:: 'aggressive is a big M - and the misses generally
::  don't survive aeroplane crashes.' dadadodo





Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Piers Cawley

Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On 08/06/2001 at 12:30 +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
 ... and some not so pretty pictures.
 
 http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/london.pm/2001-06-07/
 
 Bah. Too many of me. And not enough of you here:
 
 http://husk.org/perl/pics/
 
 Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.

Really pretty pics: 

http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/

But I may be biased.

There are no London.pmers in those though.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


 http://husk.org/perl/pics/
 Warning: dislike of flash may lead to fuzzyness and light trails.

Very artistic.  I think your camera was drunk (thank $deity - I don't get
on with them sober).  Nice to meet you all.  I'll be ba-ack.


L.
I love the smell of fruit flies in the morning.




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Paul Mison

On 11/06/2001 at 11:10 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 http://husk.org/perl/pics/

http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/

But I may be biased.

Nah, they are nice. But you've been selective, I'm assuming (unless
you've just taken seven photos in your entire life) whereas I just
upload all of my photos (except the ones in NY), so they're all
available for ridicule.

--
:: paul
:: 'aggressive is a big M - and the misses generally
::  don't survive aeroplane crashes.' dadadodo





Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Piers Cawley

Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On 11/06/2001 at 11:10 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
 Paul Mison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  http://husk.org/perl/pics/
 
 http://www.well.com/user/pdcawley/misc_images/
 
 But I may be biased.
 
 Nah, they are nice. But you've been selective,

Of course, first step towards being a decent photographer is learning
to edit. When you're scanning off negatives and you don't have a bulk
scanner then you *have* to be selective. Life is too short.

 I'm assuming (unless you've just taken seven photos in your entire
 life) whereas I just upload all of my photos (except the ones in
 NY), so they're all available for ridicule.

I'd suggest building a page of 'favourites'. Just thinking about why
they are your favourites and what you did to make the image will
improve your general photography. Certainly my contacts sheets have
got generally better as I've taken more photographs and gone through
the editing process with them.

Not very perlish I'm afraid.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Ian Brayshaw

Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Not very perlish I'm afraid.

a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).
b) That makes it an appropriate topic for this list.


Ian

_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Paul Mison

On 11/06/2001 at 12:46 +0100, Ian Brayshaw wrote:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Not very perlish I'm afraid.

a) I'm sure that will change in time (any camel shots?).

http://husk.org/lndn/circ/compat/DSCF0102.jpg

See, the advantages of posting everything.

--
:: paul
:: 'aggressive is a big M - and the misses generally
::  don't survive aeroplane crashes.' dadadodo





Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Tony Bowden

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
 Just thinking about why they are your favourites and what you did to
 make the image will improve your general photography. Certainly my
 contacts sheets have got generally better as I've taken more photographs
 and gone through the editing process with them.
 Not very perlish I'm afraid.

Learning what you do well by studying it, and getting better over time
isn't perlish?

Weird. I though that was part of the essence of perl.

Tony
-- 
--
 Tony Bowden | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.tmtm.com/
 life is a sleazy stranger - and this is his favourite bar
--

 PGP signature


Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Leon Brocard

Piers Cawley sent the following bits through the ether:

 Unlikely. http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
 vaguely perlish though.

Taking pictures of me when I've a) not slept much b) was tired anyway
c) at morning when I haven't had a shower probably isn't going to produce the next 
[insert name of famous photographer/subject].

Leon
-- 
Leon Brocard.http://www.astray.com/
Iterative Software...http://www.iterative-software.com/

... All things are green unless they are not



Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Jonathan Peterson

At 13:01 11/06/01 +0100, you wrote:

Unlikely. http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
vaguely perlish though.

Hey, that's a good photo. It's Leontastic.




-- 
Jonathan Peterson
Technical Manager, Unified Ltd, 020 7383 6092
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Lucy McWilliam


On 11 Jun 2001, Piers Cawley wrote:

 http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
 vaguely perlish though.

Scary (no offense)


L.
I would say it's a 'fruit knife' but it's not big and it's not cleaver.




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Piers Cawley

Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:23:26PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
  Just thinking about why they are your favourites and what you did to
  make the image will improve your general photography. Certainly my
  contacts sheets have got generally better as I've taken more photographs
  and gone through the editing process with them.
  Not very perlish I'm afraid.
 
 Learning what you do well by studying it, and getting better over time
 isn't perlish?
 
 Weird. I though that was part of the essence of perl.

Hmm... good point. Time for a journal entry I think.

-- 
Piers Cawley
www.iterative-software.com




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Jonathan Stowe

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:

 At 13:01 11/06/01 +0100, you wrote:

 Unlikely. http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png is
 vaguely perlish though.

 Hey, that's a good photo. It's Leontastic.


No Red eyes, not sitting in front of a picture of well known nazi
leader , it cant be the real Leon ...

/J\




Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Philip Newton

Piers Cawley wrote:
 http://www.iterative-software.com/~pdcawley/acme.png

For some reason, that reminded me of tchrist, especially the region around
the mouth and chin.

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.



RE: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Matthew Jones

 For some reason, that reminded me of tchrist, especially the 
---^^^

Is that Northern for Jesus?

-- 
matt | only a wardrobe away 
 



Re: Some pretty pictures ...

2001-06-11 Thread Philip Newton

[Hey, where did your attributions go? Mailer-daemon ate them?]

Matthew Jones wrote:
  For some reason, that reminded me of tchrist, especially the 
 ---^^^
 
 Is that Northern for Jesus?

What's Northern? Northern English?

Anyway, it's Unix-login-ese for Tom Christiansen, whom you may have heard
of in the context of Perl ;-).

Cheers,
Philip
-- 
Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.