On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:54:56PM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote:
> it no longer kills dia
This appears not to be the case, as of dia 0.86.
--
I did write and prove correct a 20-line program in January, but I made
the mistake of testing it on our VAX and it had an error, which two
weeks of searchi
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
>
> > Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish.
> > A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is
> > automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault.
> >
> > HE
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote:
>
> the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller,
>
> is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/
>
> it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats -
> it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my
>
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish.
> A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is
> automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault.
>
> HEY!
Actually I think it was me who told him to "release ea
Aaron Trevena wrote:
>
> the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller,
>
> is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/
>From the FAQ (http://droogs.org/autodial/FAQ)
Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish.
A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is
automatically deferred to
