Re: re-release of autodial
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:54:56PM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote: > it no longer kills dia This appears not to be the case, as of dia 0.86. -- I did write and prove correct a 20-line program in January, but I made the mistake of testing it on our VAX and it had an error, which two weeks of searching didn't uncover, so there went one publication out the window. - David Gries, 1980
Re: re-release of autodial
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, David Cantrell wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > > > Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish. > > A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is > > automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault. > > > > HEY! > > Actually I think it was me who told him to "release early, release often". > But he's right, it is muttley's fault. yes but trelane told me to just release it, but then i was drunk and it seemed like a good idea at the time, m'lord. A. -- http://termisoc.org/~betty"> Betty @ termisoc.org "As a youngster Fred fought sea battles on the village pond using a complex system of signals he devised that was later adopted by the Royal Navy. " (this email has nothing to do with any organisation except me)
Re: re-release of autodial
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote: > > the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller, > > is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/ > > it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats - > it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my > head. :) > Hey but I filed a bug report on Dia anyhow as it really shouldnt do that whatever it is you feed it :) /J\
Re: re-release of autodial
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: > Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish. > A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is > automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault. > > HEY! Actually I think it was me who told him to "release early, release often". But he's right, it is muttley's fault. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/ This is a signature. There are many like it but this one is mine. ** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your message is important **
Re: re-release of autodial
Aaron Trevena wrote: > > the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller, > > is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/ >From the FAQ (http://droogs.org/autodial/FAQ) Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish. A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault. HEY! :)
re-release of autodial
the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller, is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/ it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats - it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my head. :) A. -- http://termisoc.org/~betty"> Betty @ termisoc.org "As a youngster Fred fought sea battles on the village pond using a complex system of signals he devised that was later adopted by the Royal Navy. " (this email has nothing to do with any organisation except me)
