Re: your mail
> but i'm back and boy do i have a lot to post about! Like links to litigation lawyers after your "Stone Soup" talk ;)
Re: your mail
* Dominic Mitchell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > yet another test > > I'm sorry, but you appear to have failed again. This message is quite > visible! :-( > well i had managed to screw up mail for 2 days, i personally believe it was a communist/socialist/signal lovers conspiracy to stop me being the king of the noise on london.pm but i'm back and boy do i have a lot to post about! wooo h -- Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/
Re: your mail
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > yet another test I'm sorry, but you appear to have failed again. This message is quite visible! :-( -Dom -- | Semantico: creators of major online resources | | URL: http://www.semantico.com/ | | Tel: +44 (1273) 72 | | Address: 33 Bond St., Brighton, Sussex, BN1 1RD, UK. |
Re: your mail
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:13:34PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > would people mind if i turned up totally pissed from minute 0 to > tonights meeting? i've had lunch with a friend and its done bad > things to me Clearly it's done odd things to your ability to write a subject... dha -- David H. Adler - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ Okay, that's it. 30 days no computer use penalty for being stupid - Greg at http://www.userfriendly.org
Re: your mail
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 04:13:34PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: > > would people mind if i turned up totally pissed from minute 0 to > tonights meeting? s/mind/notice/ -- dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
