* at 21/04 10:14 +0100 Robin Szemeti said:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, you wrote:
I read it as not wanting to fund the various commercial entities one
ends up funding in order to actual get a digital box. The idea of
putting any more money in the Murdoch empires coffers just for the
sake of
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, you wrote:
I read it as not wanting to fund the various commercial entities one
ends up funding in order to actual get a digital box. The idea of
putting any more money in the Murdoch empires coffers just for the
sake of getting News 24 and BBC Choice certainly doesn't
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
ObLon.pm: A buffy DW crossover would be cool... In fact:
http://members.iglou.com/scarfman/dwxst.htm
Buffy as the Doctor's assistant, now that would rock. Picture it
some shambling monster is coming down the corridor, Buffy and the
Doctor are
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
And there was me thinking that Chris was going to say that he doesn't have
a TV either. But he didn't. I don't have a TV. But I'm currently camped out
in my parents house, and they have 2. But I learn that they will both be
From: "Dominic Mitchell" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
And there was me thinking that Chris was going to say that he doesn't
have
a TV either. But he didn't. I don't have a TV. But I'm currently camped
out
in my parents house, and they
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
Hmm. I too am pissed off about this digital stuff, as the quality is worse
than analogue TV. My measure of quality is uninterrupted viewing. I have yet
to watch any digital TV where at some point the picture didn't pixelate or
completely blank for a
* Robert Shiels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hmm. I too am pissed off about this digital stuff, as the quality is worse
than analogue TV. My measure of quality is uninterrupted viewing. I have yet
to watch any digital TV where at some point the picture didn't pixelate or
completely blank for
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Byng-Maddick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I don't mind funding the beeb, as long as the quality of
content they produce is high. I do object to funding random corporations
whose interests are to their shareholders...
Sorry, I don't mind funding
* Robert Shiels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: "Greg McCarroll" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But if you get a digital TV/receiver, surely BBC is available for free
without any subscriptions. If this is not the case then I think it's
criminal.
it is
I can read that two ways, do you
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:06:02PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
hard to say [BBC channels] are normally given free if you subscribe to one
premier channel
If your telly has a built-in digital decoder, then the BBC channels will
be free, and you won't need cable or a satellite dish.
IANABBCE
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:33:59PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:06:02PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
hard to say [BBC channels] are normally given free if you subscribe to one
premier channel
If your telly has a built-in digital decoder, then the BBC channels
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, you wrote:
Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't be suprised if by then the abolishment of the licence fee hasn't been
announced and that the BBC hasn't announced subscription charges for it's
services. Better that than the Beeb starts carrying ads.
Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it likely that the licence fee will go. It would be a popular
move with the Great Unwashed. ( who seem happy to spend 400 quid a year
on a Sky subscription ), so I can see the BBC being released from its
licence fee. This would have huge
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Make them start producing Doctor Who again, while you're at it...
If they do start doing Doctor Who again it will have a finite lifespan,
is he not near the maximum number or lives a timelord can regenerate?
--
Greg McCarroll
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:31:59PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Make them start producing Doctor Who again, while you're at it...
If they do start doing Doctor Who again it will have a finite lifespan,
is he not near the maximum number or
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:34:02AM +0100, Robert Shiels wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Byng-Maddick" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally I don't mind funding the beeb, as long as the quality of
content they produce is high. I do object to funding random corporations
whose
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 08:33:29PM +0100, Chris Benson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
technical meeting then you can either video it or watch the repeat on 00:35
on Friday night/Saturday morning.
I'm painfully aware that not everyone on this list has the same amount of
experience and knowledge and that therefore some discussions may well go
over the head of some of the newbies. It's therefore nice to be able to find
ways to help out beginners.
For that reason, I'm happy to point out the
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, you wrote:
I'm painfully aware that not everyone on this list has the same amount of
experience and knowledge and that therefore some discussions may well go
over the head of some of the newbies. It's therefore nice to be able to find
ways to help out beginners.
uh huh
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 10:41:46AM +0100, Robin Szemeti wrote:
I'm painfully aware that not everyone on this list has the same amount of
experience and knowledge and that therefore some discussions may well go
over the head of some of the newbies. It's therefore nice to be able to find
* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
technical meeting then you can either video it or watch the repeat on 00:35
on Friday night/Saturday morning.
umm .. would now be a good time to point out I don't have a television?
scripts are available on the web - there is no excuse for not
21 matches
Mail list logo
