Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-05 Thread Paul Makepeace

Neil Ford noted:
 Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
 [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
 The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
 switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
 did not match the passion and vision demonstrated by rival network UPN,
 which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
 $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
 
 UPN sontinued to show it's vision and passion with the $50,000 gift
 baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
 network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
 Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
 the comments - was given a Gucci necklace.
 
 Heat may not always be the most reliable rag, but it's ususally fairly
 accurate on this stuff.

Valley girls just like to have funds.

Paul


-- 
Twist the spine



RE: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-04 Thread Cross David - dcross

From: Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 10:43 AM

[there are actually no spoliers left in this post so I'm removing the
spoiler space]

 i'm a little worried that the next season will suck.
 lets wait and see if the warning signs are there, more
 weird settings i.e. they all get sucked into the
 movie casablanca and the episode is entirely in black
 and white, guest appearances from other shows/from
 major celebrities.

Apparently they're planning a musical episode[1]

Dave...

[1] This is not a joke!

-- 


The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader 
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  
If you have received this communication in error, please 
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the 
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-03 Thread Neil Ford

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   
   
   
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
   will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
   theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
   a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
   used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
  
  Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
  
 I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
 more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
 is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
 Universal).
 
 So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
 time to work it out...
 
 i just hope I have been mis-informed.
 
Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 

Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
[Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
did not match the passion and vision demonstrated by rival network UPN,
which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
$22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.

UPN sontinued to show it's vision and passion with the $50,000 gift
baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
the comments - was given a Gucci necklace.

Heat may not always be the most reliable rag, but it's ususally fairly
accurate on this stuff.

Neil.
-- 
Neil C. Ford
Managing Director, Yet Another Computer Solutions Company Limited
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.yacsc.com



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-03 Thread Robin Szemeti

On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Neil Ford wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
   On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:



*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 









































Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
   
   Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
   
  I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
  more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
  is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
  Universal).
  
  So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
  time to work it out...
  
  i just hope I have been mis-informed.
  
 Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
 wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 
 
 Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
 [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
 The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
 switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
 did not match the passion and vision demonstrated by rival network UPN,
 which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
 $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
 
 UPN sontinued to show it's vision and passion with the $50,000 gift
 baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
 network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
 Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
 the comments - was given a Gucci necklace.

kewl ... so Buffy likes necklaces then. 
we could give her one as a present .. that would be nice ... diamond
maybe ...or since we are a Perl group perhaps ... oh ok .. you're way
ahead of me on this one aren't you. ;)

-- 
Robin Szemeti   

Redpoint Consulting Limited
Real Solutions For A Virtual World 



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-03 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Neil Ford wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
   On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 
 
 *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
 *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
 *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
 will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
 theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
 a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
 used the phrase ``clutching at straws''

Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?

   I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
   more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
   is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
   Universal).
   
   So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
   time to work it out...
   
   i just hope I have been mis-informed.
   
  Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
  wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 
  
  Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
  [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
  The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
  switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
  did not match the passion and vision demonstrated by rival network UPN,
  which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
  $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
  
  UPN sontinued to show it's vision and passion with the $50,000 gift
  baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
  network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
  Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
  the comments - was given a Gucci necklace.
 
 kewl ... so Buffy likes necklaces then. 
   ^
   |
   +--- It was about here i guessed
where this was going ;-)  
  
 we could give her one as a present .. that would be nice ... diamond
 maybe ...or since we are a Perl group perhaps ... oh ok .. you're way
 ahead of me on this one aren't you. ;)
 
 -- 
 Robin Szemeti   
 
 Redpoint Consulting Limited
 Real Solutions For A Virtual World 
-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/










Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-03 Thread Dave Cross

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 
 Dave, U still need last weeks video ?

Nope. All caught up now thanks.

Dave...




Re: The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

2001-06-03 Thread Dave Hodgkinson

Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 now i remember
 the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon
 
 ahhh halycon days 

halcyon?

Anyway we all know it peaked with Sally James...


-- 
Dave Hodgkinson, http://www.hodgkinson.org
Editor-in-chief, The Highway Star   http://www.deep-purple.com
  Interim CTO, web server farms, technical strategy
   



Re: The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

2001-06-03 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Hodgkinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 Greg McCarroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  now i remember
  the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon
  
  ahhh halycon days 
 
 halcyon?
 

some of us are blessed with typing speeds above that of normal mortals
and hence find that normal `earth' keyboards do not always keep up with
us - hence this unfortunate inicdant ;-)

 Anyway we all know it peaked with Sally James...
 

tiswas? a tiswas ... 

-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-03 Thread Robin Szemeti

On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
 * Robin Szemeti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  On Sun, 03 Jun 2001, Neil Ford wrote:
   On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 04:45:45PM +0100, Leo Lapworth wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  
  
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
  will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
  theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
  a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
  used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
 
 Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
 
I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
Universal).

So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
time to work it out...

i just hope I have been mis-informed.

   Trying to remember where I read this (probably Heat) but SMG *had* said she
   wouldn't stay with the show if it moved from WB to UPN. 
   
   Quick bit of digging and I've found the following;
   [Heat Magazine, 19-25 May 2001]
   The producers of Buffy, Fox TV, have offered ridiculous soundbites to justify
   switching TV networks in the US. The WB, home to Buffy since it's inception,
   did not match the passion and vision demonstrated by rival network UPN,
   which has secured the show for two years. The fact that UPN bid a total of
   $22 million more than WB wasn't mentioned by Fox.
   
   UPN sontinued to show it's vision and passion with the $50,000 gift
   baskets it sent eight Buffy cast regulars to welcome them to their new
   network - which included Cristal champagne and a Cartier watch, Sarah
   Michelle Gellar - who once said she'd quit Buffy if it left WB, then retracted
   the comments - was given a Gucci necklace.
  
  kewl ... so Buffy likes necklaces then. 
^
|
+--- It was about here i guessed
 where this was going ;-)  

hmmm .. I am unsure at this point whether that says more about your mind
than it does about mine ;-))



-- 
Robin Szemeti   

Redpoint Consulting Limited
Real Solutions For A Virtual World 



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Dave Cross

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
wrote:
 
 
 
 *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
 *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
 *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
 will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
 theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
 a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
 used the phrase ``clutching at straws''

Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?

Dave...




Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  
  
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
  will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
  theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
  a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
  used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
 
 Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
 

i didn't know that - THANKS DAVE! 


-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Greg McCarroll ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 * Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   
   
   
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
   will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
   theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
   a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
   used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
  
  Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
  
 
 i didn't know that - THANKS DAVE! 
 

just to clarify that, that was a genuine thanks, not a sarcastic one.
after i hit send, i thought it could of sounded sarcastic.

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread James Powell

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  
  
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
  will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
  theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
  a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
  used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
 
 Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
 

BAH!




Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Greg McCarroll

* James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   
   
   
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
   will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
   theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
   a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
   used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
  
  Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
  
 
 BAH!
 

The main bummer after last nights episode is that glory is dead, and i was 
just starting to warm to her, only she wasn't quite psychotic enough. ;-)

-- 
Greg McCarroll  http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net




Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Leo Lapworth

On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  
  
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
  will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
  theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
  a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
  used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
 
 Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
 
I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
Universal).

So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
time to work it out...

i just hope I have been mis-informed.

Dave, U still need last weeks video ?

Leo



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Matthew Robinson

On Saturday, June 02, 2001 4:45 PM Leo Lapworth wrote:

 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  
  
  
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT*
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
   will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show
credits/
   theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of
been
   a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife
she
   used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
 
  Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
 
 I've been told (*prays this is not true*) that SMG signed up for two
 more series but has a clause that if Univeral Pictures produce it she
 is not oblidged to do them (as apparently she didn't want to work for
 Universal).

 So, this could be an ending to make sure she and Univeral have
 time to work it out...

 i just hope I have been mis-informed.

 Dave, U still need last weeks video ?

 Leo


Anthony Head said this morning on Live  Kicking[1] that Buffy will
definitely be back and that the change of network in the US would not effect
the BBC showing new Buffy (everyone involved was trying not to mention the
rival Sky).  Obviously, this is just his opinion but it adds to the rumour
mill.

Matt

[1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live  Kicking as I don't know the
answer

--
s!msfQ!s$utvKs(Q)\1!sfiupoBs^reverse Ibdlfses^#
s$#!uojsqs(.)chr(ord($1)-1)ges(.*)reverse $1see






Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread Mike Jarvis

Saturday, June 02, 2001, 5:58:44 AM, Greg McCarroll wrote:

GM * James Powell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 08:19:56AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
  On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Greg McCarroll 
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
   
   
   
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Well what about last night? Buffy no more? Well I'm pretty sure she
   will be back, my reasoning - they played the normal end of show credits/
   theme tune, if they had of killed the character off, there would of been
   a special ending. Mind you, when I explained this theory to the wife she
   used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
  
  Well, how about the argument that SMG has singed up for two more series?
  
 
 BAH!
 

GM The main bummer after last nights episode is that glory is dead, and i was 
GM just starting to warm to her, only she wasn't quite psychotic enough. ;-)


from salon.com
http://www.salon.com/ent/col/mill/2001/05/29/finales_2001/index3.html
Wednesday morning, series creator Joss Whedon (who wrote and directed the finale)
posted to the official WB Buffy board dispelling the hoax rumor. 'Buffy' will
be back next season starring Sarah Michelle Gellar ... Tuesdays at 8 p.m. on UPN,
Whedon wrote. How will we bring her back? With great difficulty, of course. And
pain and confusion. Will it be cheezy [sic]? I don't think so. Thursday, he
further laid to rest the hoax rumor, and revealed some plans for next season,
in an interview with TV Guide Online. Did you know that Giles is getting a BBC spinoff?


-- 
mike





Re: The truth will out ( was Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT)

2001-06-02 Thread Greg McCarroll

* Jonathan Stowe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
 On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Matthew Robinson wrote:
 
  [1] Don't ask me why I was watching Live  Kicking as I don't know the
  answer
 
 
 Oh we will ask you, and you are expected to make up some bulllshit however
 ludicrous,  now that Ant  Dec dont do it you cant say you fancy them ...
 

nah Jonathan, you got it wrong, they were on the other side on CD UK or
some such. they were actually quite entertaining with cat deally, however
you spell it, with them. i think they got moved to prime time, which
probably will be a one season wonder. as for live and kicking it seems
to have gone down the tubes badly, there is some american bloke who
really has a persona that makes you want to ram his head repeatedly into
plate glass until you break through and it also has that tart (i say
that in an accurate way) from the karaoke show with suggs. now i remember
the good old days of live and kicking with sarah green and pete and simon

ahhh halycon days 


-- 
Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/



Re: BUFFY - SPOILERS , DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN SKY 1 LAST NIGHT

2001-06-02 Thread David Irvine



*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
 ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
 ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 
*SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* *SPOILER
 ALERT* *SPOILER ALERT* 









































Well what about last night? Buffy no more?
 Well I'm pretty sure she
will be back, my reasoning - they played the
 normal end of show credits/
theme tune, if they had of killed the
 character off, there would of been
a special ending. Mind you, when I explained
 this theory to the wife she
used the phrase ``clutching at straws''
   
   Well, how about the argument that SMG has
 singed up for two more series?
   

My bet is that she got sucked through the portal into
the dark side and will get spat back out in 9 months
time or whenever the next series is.  Probably in a
pretty bad mood, angel will be all happy again and
Sunnydale will be back to normal, or as normal as it
gets.  Who knows?

David


=
Artificial Intelligence is no match for human stupitity!


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/