On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:07 +0100, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better description would be
that it parses approximate Perl.
Thus making the phrase 'you can't make up any old shit and expect it to
work'
At Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:07:28 +0100 (BST), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better description
would be that it parses
* Dave Cross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:07:28 +0100 (BST), Jonathan Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, David H. Adler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:07:28AM +0100, Jonathan Stowe wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
And I realise that my description yesterday was slightly inaccurate.
I said it would parse Perl approximately. A better description would
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote:
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
^^
What does it do?
It, er... parses Perl.
Strictly speaking it doesn't do anything, due to not currently existing.
ooh! I though
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
David H. Adler wrote:
What, no CiP rating???
Well, there wasn't any Perl code included. But it should be pretty
straightforward to hack the algorithm together, or might as well hijack the
Convert::Base32 module for the
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:33:16 -0500, "David H. Adler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
David H. Adler wrote:
What, no CiP rating???
Well, there wasn't any Perl code included. But it should be pretty
straightforward to hack the
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
You are an evil man.
MBM
--
Matthew Byng-Maddick Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 20 8980 5714 (Home)
http://colondot.net/ Work:
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:38:16 +0100 (BST), Matthew Byng-Maddick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
You are an evil man.
You know I'm
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
What does it do?
.robin.
--
Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!
* David H. Adler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:37:14PM +0200, Philip Newton wrote:
David H. Adler wrote:
What, no CiP rating???
Well, there wasn't any Perl code included. But it should be pretty
straightforward to hack the algorithm together, or might as well
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:07 +0100, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation of a Parse::Perl::Approx module :)
What does it do?
It, er...
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:52:23AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
At Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:44:07 +0100, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 11:35:33AM -0500, Dave Cross wrote:
Would this be an appropriate time to point out that my TPC talk
proposes the creation
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
The other possibility, I guess, given that it's london.pm is
to make it relate to buffy in some way :)
That reminds me of an idea I had this morning on the way to work -- encode
text using "Buffy" with uppercase and lowercase letters: uppercase letters
stand
At Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:39:34 +0200, Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
The other possibility, I guess, given that it's london.pm is
to make it relate to buffy in some way :)
That reminds me of an idea I had this morning on the way to work --
encode
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 01:07:44PM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote:
agreed, this is just f*cking crazy, sorry for the swearing, but this
is the craziest thing i've seen this year
What, no CiP rating???
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Just Install Perl.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
agreed, this is just f*cking crazy, sorry for the swearing, but this
is the craziest thing i've seen this year
I wouldnt get too carried away after all its only march :)
/J\
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:04:03PM +, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
MBM wrote:
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script archive it
won't be.
The other possibility, I guess, given that it's london.pm is to make it
relate to buffy in some way :)
Or
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Dave Cross wrote:
Here's an extract from an email I've just got from Elizabeth Castro,
the author of "Perl CGI for the WWW - Visual Quickstrt Guide".
She's talking about the second edition which should be out in a couple
of months.
"I am using many of your
L. said:
World domination is ours. Muahahaha!
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script archive it
won't be.
Ideas to the usual address.
*Please*
Later.
Mark.
(damnit Jim, I'm a Technology Developer, not a Copywriter)
--
print "\n",map{my$a="\n"if(length$_6);'
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
World domination is ours. Muahahaha!
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script archive it
won't be.
I don't think we tried "London.pm's Script Archive", did we? :)
Okay, I
At Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:37:51 + (GMT), Mark Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
L. said:
World domination is ours. Muahahaha!
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script
archive it won't be.
Ideas to the usual address.
*Please*
I thought that 'EasyScripts' (or,
At Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:37:51 + (GMT), Mark Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
World domination is ours. Muahahaha!
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script
archive it won't be.
Might as well mention London.pm, tho' "London.pm's Script Arcives" is a
bit out
MBM wrote:
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script archive it
won't be.
The other possibility, I guess, given that it's london.pm is to make it
relate to buffy in some way :)
Or beer. Or both ;-)
Lucy.
Dave Cross wrote:
At Fri, 23 Mar 2001 16:37:51 + (GMT), Mark Fowler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
L. said:
World domination is ours. Muahahaha!
Not if we can't come up with a good name for not matt's script
archive it won't be.
Ideas to the usual address.
*Please*
I thought
How at http://london.pm.org/scripts/
404...
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, you wrote:
I thought that 'EasyScripts' (or, even, 'EZScripts')
and I can tell you that ezscripts.org is still available
the .com is a parking page and the .net doesn;t resolve.
--
Robin Szemeti
The box said "requires windows 95 or better"
So I installed Linux!
At Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:38:48 -, "Clarke, Darren" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What was that book that Dave criticised on Amazon about 2 months ago?
The one where the author emailed a reply which was passed around at
the February social meeting?
It was "Perl and CGI for the World Wide Web
Title: RE: That book
At Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:38:48 -, Clarke, Darren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was that book that Dave criticised on Amazon about 2 months ago?
The one where the author emailed a reply which was passed around at
the February social meeting?
Dave Cross replied
At Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:53:12 -, "Clarke, Darren" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:38:48 -, "Clarke, Darren"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was that book that Dave criticised on Amazon about 2 months =
ago?
The one where the author emailed a reply which was
Title: RE: That book
Dave wrote:
Well, it's still on the Waterstones site atm, but I'd appreciate it if
you could lose it.
It's part of a kind of deal that we struck. She agreed to listen to my
suggestions if I stopped slagging her off in public :)
My current target is Open Source Linux
Robin Szemeti sent the following bits through the ether:
bet he got his mate to write it :)
I noticed that. For a moment I thought it was a rigged review by the
author / his friend / the publisher. But we know that respectable
publishers don't do that kind of thing, right?
Leon
--
Leon
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, you wrote:
Robin Szemeti sent the following bits through the ether:
bet he got his mate to write it :)
I noticed that. For a moment I thought it was a rigged review by the
author / his friend / the publisher. But we know that respectable
publishers don't do that
At 19:01 22/03/2001, you wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 06:25:40PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
But we know that respectable publishers don't do that kind of thing, right?
^^
I don't understand.
I think you'll find in it the dictionary as the definition of
35 matches
Mail list logo
