another test

2001-06-14 Thread Greg McCarroll
this is the final test -- Greg McCarrollhttp://217.34.97.146/~gem/

Re: another test

2001-06-14 Thread Lucy McWilliam
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: this is the final test No wonder you're number 1 in the posting league. L. I've got a touch of the singles. Shingles? No, singles.

Test of sorts

2001-06-12 Thread Jonathan Stowe
Since I've changed my mail setup I've had a bit of a problem with resending the bounced mails - hopefully this will prove that I fixed it :) You shouldnt be seeing any spurious [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: headers in this ... /J\ -- Jonathan Stowe Analyst/Programmer Netscalibur UK Tel: 0870 887

test

2001-05-17 Thread Greg McCarroll
just a test -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: test

2001-05-17 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:06:41AM +0100, Greg McCarroll wrote: just a test You say that it's just test. Who are we to believe you. In fact, I think you're part of the US Govt consipracy to overload foreign networks with test messages. Prove that you're not. -Dom (Not My Real Name)

Re: test

2001-05-17 Thread Philip Newton
Greg McCarroll wrote: just a test Sorry, didn't arrive in Germany. You have some kind of UK only filter on these things? Please sent it again, with the filter turned off. Cheers, Philip (feeling testy) -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:57:08PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Merijn Broeren
pe -remote 'openURL(%s)'; test=RunningNetscape # Else use lynx to view it as text text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput text/*; cat %s ; copiousoutput application/msword; catdoc; copiousoutput application/postscript; ps2ascii %s; copiousoutput And loads more for images and stuff. Especia

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:37:54AM +0200, Merijn Broeren wrote: On the risk of offending the person who gets really tired of the w3m-is-better meme, I prefer w3m because I get send so many tables in html, they show up real nice. I found a problem with w3m (which I admittedly didn't look at

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Mark Fowler
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Merijn Broeren wrote: # Else use lynx to view it as text text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput Quick question for us non mutt users that may one day consider using it. Does this run throgh the shell? And what's %s in this? I'm kinda hoping it's not able to be '; rm

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Simon Wistow
Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Feature request - IMAP client. Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a spare second. (Yeah, right.) There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :( -- Sendmail may be safely run set-user-id to root.

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Simon Wistow
Simon Cozens wrote: On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :( Yeah, tell me about it. hence

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than Lookout. ;-) [ ~/.mailcap

Test

2001-04-04 Thread Clarke, Darren
Title: Test Sorry all - this is a test... :¬P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* Darren Newbie Loser

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Philip Newton
Clarke, Darren wrote: Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* I agree. Your mail server lost again. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* Darren Newbie Loser You don't get away from a Newbie without learning though. Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML

Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread James . Herbert
BDY.RTF Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Robin Houston
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. People with broken mail clients may disagree :-) .robin. -- select replace(a, CHR(88

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Greg McCarroll
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. thats perfect as far as i'm concerned (mutt user) -- Greg McCarroll http

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. People with broken mail

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Gareth Harper
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: Test from uuencode boy test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Snip

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, you wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. works for me .. theres stuff I dont need, but since it identifies whats what in the headers I can read it fine

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Robin Houston
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? :-) .robin. (reads london-pm with the 'D' key) -- Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Okay, you have a 17

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Merijn Broeren
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Your message looks like this : I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ, 7bit

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Struan Donald
* at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? doesn't eveyone archive all their mail? *some*

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Sort of - pine seems to prefer the disclaimer over the body of the message as an alternative part but I have

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: * at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks?

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: However, it's more all these *** job agencies sending me things in multi-crap that I'm shifting home over a modem to read at home. scp -C is good at making things smaller, but

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Feature request - IMAP client. Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a spare second. (Yeah, right.) -- We *have* dirty minds. This is not news. - Kake Pugh

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. Don't bother. If it was worth saying, it was worth saying properly. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Mail::ListDetector - please test

2001-01-21 Thread Michael Stevens
Hi. I have an (as yet unreleased) module called Mail::ListDetector, which takes a Mail::Internet object, and attempts to tell you if the message involved was posted to a mailing list, and if so, attempts to get some details about that list. I need testers - in particular, see if it builds and