London.pm - FAQ for web site (was books or something).

2001-06-14 Thread Leo Lapworth
Well, as has been muttered about I am redoing the London.pm.org website. And yes it DOES need a faq, I have the start of one, but would very much love someone else to finish it off. So, If anyone is up for it give me a yell and I'll email you the XML that needs populating. The website

Re: London.pm - FAQ for web site (was books or something).

2001-06-14 Thread Leon Brocard
Leo Lapworth sent the following bits through the ether: And yes it DOES need a faq, I have the start of one, but would very much love someone else to finish it off. google++ # london.pm faq http://www.mail-archive.com/london-pm%40lists.dircon.co.uk/msg02436.html -- Leon

Re: London.pm - FAQ for web site (was books or something).

2001-06-14 Thread Struan Donald
* at 14/06 14:55 +0100 Leo Lapworth said: Well, as has been muttered about I am redoing the London.pm.org website. And yes it DOES need a faq, I have the start of one, but would very much love someone else to finish it off. So, If anyone is up for it give me a yell and I'll email you the

Web site

2001-01-24 Thread Neil Ford
Dave I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps? Neil. -- Neil C. Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.binky.ourshack.org

Re: Web site

2001-01-24 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:36:28PM +, Neil Ford wrote: I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps? http://dave.told.us.to is correct though :-) -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: Web site

2001-01-24 Thread Dave Cross
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps? Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me. Dave..

Re: Web site

2001-01-24 Thread Neil Ford
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps? Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me. Dave.. The

Re: Web site

2001-01-24 Thread Simon_Wilcox
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps? Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me. Dave..

Re: Web site

2001-01-24 Thread Dave Cross
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:20:36 +, Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps?

Re: Web site

2001-01-24 Thread Dave Cross
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:41:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps? Which