to delete the URL in a browser window and then paste. Being
able to click it and then hit ^V is *much* nicer (in Windows)
than this manual delete time wastage.
If you run enlightment as a windowmanager you can use the URL
epplet. You simply highlight the URL (or a lump of text which contains
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Fowler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 January 2001 11:19
Subject: Re: odd -w effect
Strange. Does anyone have any suggestions?
I've also had this problem with CGI scripts running under apache on Windows.
Keep the -w i
Mark Fowler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Unix might have a problem if you take the -w out using a windows based
editor which will insert some nasty line terminator at the end of the
lines and screw up the file. That's what I normally find
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:57:13PM +0100, Philip Newton wrote:
Mark Fowler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Unix might have a problem if you take the -w out using a windows based
editor which will insert some nasty line terminator at
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 12:08:50 +, Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:04:33PM +, Roger Burton West wrote:
On or about Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:08:37PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Got it -- something else to stick in the commit checks... grrr... I
On or about Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:31:28PM +, Michael Stevens typed:
I propose we drag these people and drop them in those big rubbish bins
you see outside offices.
DD is vaguely useful sometimes. Just not when I'm editing text.
Anyone played much with PowerArchiver? Freeware WinZip
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:35:17PM -, Robert Shiels wrote:
Let's be kind to the poor Windows users, encouraging them with the lure of
free powerful software; once they get a taste for it they'll be begging you
to help them get Linux installed as a dual boot on their home machines, then
On or about Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:43:46PM +, Michael Stevens typed:
We need to just get on with using linux, and other sensible stuff, and
IF PEOPLE ASK QUESTIONS then we can tell them about it. But we shouldn't
try to promote it as what they want, because invariably they start going
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:46:13PM +, Roger Burton West wrote:
On or about Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:43:46PM +, Michael Stevens typed:
We need to just get on with using linux, and other sensible stuff, and
IF PEOPLE ASK QUESTIONS then we can tell them about it. But we shouldn't
try
As I seemed to be destined to be ignored, I'll do what I should have done
and shoult a little louder:
UltraEdit32 is a really good windows editor[1] if you like the way of
Windows. It does all the right things (in the way that perl does all the
right things) with line endings. And a lot more
From: "Michael Stevens" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 January 2001 12:43
Subject: Re: odd -w effect
OTOH, that doesn't help us much with the desirable goal of getting unix
used more in the workplace. I dunno.
Well, it does actually, in a roundabout way. Peop
Michael Stevens wrote:
I hate to say it, but I'm slowly becoming converted to windows cut paste.
I like being able to highlight a block of text and hit ctrl-v to replace
that with the contents of the clipboard.
troll
Why do you hate to say it? It's better than cut and paste of X.
Linux
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:08:50PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
Emacs is available for windows. Now if I can just persuade it to save
with unix line ending conventions...
Having recently done this, the thing you want is
set-buffer-file-coding-system, the default keybinding being 'C-x RET
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:39:13PM +, Michael Stevens wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:36:40PM +, Roger Burton West wrote:
On or about Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:31:28PM +, Michael Stevens typed:
I propose we drag these people and drop them in those big rubbish bins
you see
*nix is not the future. Something else entirely is.
Yeah, BeOS. BeOS is the future. Which is to say BeOS _was_ the future. Oh
well.
Jon, who thinks Windows workstation connected to *nix machine running samba
is the prefered development environment.
From: "Jonathan Peterson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*nix is not the future. Something else entirely is.
Yeah, BeOS. BeOS is the future. Which is to say BeOS _was_ the future. Oh
well.
Jon, who thinks Windows workstation connected to *nix machine running
samba
is the prefered development
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 02:18:17PM +, Roger Burton West wrote:
Must remember to try IE under WINE.
Don't bother. It doesn't work.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
This is nice. Any idea what body-part it is?
I wrote my book under Windows - I figured that Word would be the easiest
way to produce it.
so in retrospect what would be the best format to produce a book in?
--
Duncan Bates
Developer
Proxicom UK
Tel: 020 7321 3812
Mobile: 07884 336 532
http://www.proxicom.com/
-Original Message-
From: Robert Shiels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon, who thinks Windows workstation connected to *nix machine
running
samba
is the prefered development environment.
Strangely enough, thats exactly what I do at home. With Exceed for
doing X
stuff.
If you've got a nice meaty
Original Message-
From: David Cantrell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Must remember to try IE under WINE.
Don't bother. It doesn't work.
I've seen IE5 running under wine on Debian. The machine did have a 98
partition though so he might have been using the libraries from there,
is that cheating?
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
From: "Jonathan Peterson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*nix is not the future. Something else entirely is.
Yeah, BeOS. BeOS is the future. Which is to say BeOS _was_ the future. Oh
well.
Jon, who thinks Windows workstation connected to *nix machine
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 02:23:57PM -, Bates, Duncan wrote:
I wrote my book under Windows - I figured that Word would be the easiest
way to produce it.
so in retrospect what would be the best format to produce a book in?
docbook?
markup / WYSINWYG rules
dj
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:47:59PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Jon, who thinks Windows workstation connected to *nix machine running samba
is the prefered development environment.
I'm with you on that one. That's what I'm doing right now, and with PuTTY
being such a great
At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:23:57 -, "Bates, Duncan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote my book under Windows - I figured that Word would be the easiest
way to produce it.
so in retrospect what would be the best format to produce a book in?
Oh, I'd probably do something based using the
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:07:38PM -0600, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 01:47:59PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Jon, who thinks Windows workstation connected to *nix machine running samba
is the prefered development environment.
Aye aye. Windows UI is much nicer than
25 matches
Mail list logo
