Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-17 Thread Simon Cozens

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:54:56PM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote:
 it no longer kills dia

This appears not to be the case, as of dia 0.86.

-- 
I did write and prove correct a 20-line program in January, but I made
the mistake of testing it on our VAX and it had an error, which two
weeks of searching didn't uncover, so there went one publication out the
window.  - David Gries, 1980



Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-16 Thread Aaron Trevena

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, David Cantrell wrote:

 On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
 
  Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish.
  A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is
  automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault.
  
  HEY!
 
 Actually I think it was me who told him to "release early, release often".
 But he's right, it is muttley's fault.

yes but trelane told me to just release it, but then i was drunk and it
seemed like a good idea at the time, m'lord.

A. 

-- 
A HREF = "http://termisoc.org/~betty" Betty @ termisoc.org /A
"As a youngster Fred fought sea battles on the village pond using a 
complex system of signals he devised that was later adopted by the Royal 
Navy. " (this email has nothing to do with any organisation except me)






re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread Aaron Trevena


the new version of autodial  - codenamed  DiaKiller,

is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/

it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats -
it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my
head. :)

A.

-- 
A HREF = "http://termisoc.org/~betty" Betty @ termisoc.org /A
"As a youngster Fred fought sea battles on the village pond using a 
complex system of signals he devised that was later adopted by the Royal 
Navy. " (this email has nothing to do with any organisation except me)






Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread Simon Wistow

Aaron Trevena wrote:
 
 the new version of autodial  - codenamed  DiaKiller,
 
 is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/

From the FAQ (http://droogs.org/autodial/FAQ)
Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish.
A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is
automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault.

HEY!

:)



Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread David Cantrell

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:

 Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish.
 A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is
 automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault.
 
 HEY!

Actually I think it was me who told him to "release early, release often".
But he's right, it is muttley's fault.

-- 
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/

This is a signature.  There are many like it but this one is mine.

** I read encrypted mail first, so encrypt if your message is important **



Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread Jonathan Stowe

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote:


 the new version of autodial  - codenamed  DiaKiller,

 is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/

 it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats -
 it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my
 head. :)


Hey but I filed a bug report on Dia anyhow as it really shouldnt do that
whatever it is you feed it :)

/J\