Re: Torvalds not impressed with OS X

2001-04-09 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, you wrote: On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 08:30:07AM +0100, Rob Partington wrote: I mostly like MacOS X, but it is way too resource hungry. I shouldn't need 64M to run a GUI and Unix comfortably, that's just crap. It's not just *any* GUI though, it's a GUI that does

Class::MethodMaker

2001-04-09 Thread Robin Szemeti
Gurlz, OK .. I'm not totally up to speed on OO stuff .. but I have a Class::MethodMaker question that I dont; seem to be able to understand from the documentation. its the 'key_with_create' bit ... from my reading of the documentation, if you specify a key_with_create = [ qw/ id / ], it

Re: Torvalds not impressed with OS X

2001-04-09 Thread Neil Ford
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 08:22:39AM +, Robin Szemeti wrote: On Sat, 07 Apr 2001, you wrote: On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 08:30:07AM +0100, Rob Partington wrote: I mostly like MacOS X, but it is way too resource hungry. I shouldn't need 64M to run a GUI and Unix comfortably, that's just

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary (list!)

2001-04-09 Thread Leon Brocard
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether: This is the eleventh of hopefully many weekly summaries of the London Perl Mongers mailing list. For the week starting 2001-04-02: I've been asked repeatedly (mostly by Pete Berlin ;-) to set up a seperate list for the london-list weekly

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread Struan Donald
* at 09/04 16:09 +0100 dcross - David Cross said: snip/ p.s Next social meeting is on Thur 3rd May. Suggestions for venues would be most welcome. nowhere we might be tempted to sit by the thames till the wee small hours generating tremendous hangovers :) struan

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread alex
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, dcross - David Cross wrote: Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, but I can't remember who they were. This is your opportunity to step forward. i'll do some more music for a bit. alex -- here they come lalalalala la lalalalala la

Re: London.pm List Weekly Summary (list!)

2001-04-09 Thread David H. Adler
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 12:41:56PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: Note that I'll still post the summary to london-list (for now at least). Why should you stop? You *can't* be worried about the traffic! :-) dha -- David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/ Hat! Hat! Hat!

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread jo walsh
Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing talks for us, but I can't remember who they were. This is your opportunity to step forward. i recall promising to do 20 minutes on '101 fun things to do with Tangram', or something like that. am still happy to do this, but also

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread David Cantrell
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: might be nice to have status reports from: * The t-shirt committee There has been movement on this! I, however, will not be able to attend cos I have a visitor from the darker regions of the galaxy. -- David Cantrell |

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread Dave Cross
At 19:16 09/04/2001, David Cantrell wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: might be nice to have status reports from: * The t-shirt committee There has been movement on this! I, however, will not be able to attend cos I have a visitor from the darker

Re: Torvalds not impressed with OS X

2001-04-09 Thread Chris Devers
At 08:22 AM 9.4.2001 +, Robin Szemeti wrote: personally the ultimate task of any minimise/restore function should be to get a window on or off the dispaly as fast as possible ... slowly attempting some graphical wizardry whilst chewing up CPU resources its not one of the things I lust after

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread Neil Ford
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical meeting on Thursday 19th April. It will be at State 51[1] and we'll start at about 7pm. Details on how to get to State 51 will appear on the web site...

Re: Torvalds not impressed with OS X

2001-04-09 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Chris Devers wrote: At 08:22 AM 9.4.2001 +, Robin Szemeti wrote: personally the ultimate task of any minimise/restore function should be to get a window on or off the dispaly as fast as possible ... slowly attempting some graphical wizardry whilst chewing up CPU

Re: Torvalds not impressed with OS X

2001-04-09 Thread Neil Ford
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 05:03:35PM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: [snip] Luckily, Apple included a way to change the genie effect, but chose not to put it into a GUI tool at this time. I'm sure someone will have one written within a week, but for now, here's how you do it. Open a

Re: Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread Dave Cross
At 22:10 09/04/2001, Neil Ford wrote: On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 04:09:14PM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical meeting on Thursday 19th April. It will be at State 51[1] and we'll start at about 7pm. Details on how to get

Technical Meeting - 19th April

2001-04-09 Thread dcross - David Cross
If anyone doesn't know (or has forgotten), there will be a technical meeting on Thursday 19th April. It will be at State 51[1] and we'll start at about 7pm. Details on how to get to State 51 will appear on the web site... er... soon. Last Thursday I bullied^Wasked some people to consider doing