Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Simon.
At 07:14 AM 2001.06.13 +0100, Chris Benson wrote:
I need to read the news more often, I was thinking about Louisiana!
I also need to get a better grip of the geography: I thought
LA. was the Florida side of Mississippi and Alabama.
No, it's the place where I was born -- Lower Alabama. Also
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I thought.
Grumble grumble.
At least they only
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:37:19PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
If on the other hand you want the dev team, I'm sure Barbie and I
*cough*
oh hang on, do I really want to be associated with the bastards?
could figure something to tell you for the right amount of beer.
that settles it, yes.
Quoting Richard Clamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
At least they only claim to be the maintenance team. Almost like
boasting about being the team sent in to fetch the team sent in to
rescue the hostages.
Hang on, that still sounds like the original team needed to be rescued.
I'd change that
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :)
personal hygiene? ;)
So that's why you never come home anymore...
--
Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:47:40PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:43:27PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
I'm half tempted to see what they'd teach me though... :)
personal hygiene? ;)
So that's why you never come home anymore...
I'm sorry. I didn't want you to find
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
--
simon wistowwireless systems coder
only second toughest
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y'know?
--
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:44:11AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Are there any of you lot still looking for jobs?
Still open? I think I might have someone for you.
--
If you give a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day. If you set a man on fire,
he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away...
Shame.
L.
Beer good.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
beer : no beer
--
dave thorn | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the twenty-first weekly summary of the London Perl Mongers
mailing list. This is brought to you from yapc::NorthAmerica during
Brian Ingerson's CPAN, PPM and the Future talk. For the quiet week
starting 2001-06-04:
Don't forget the London.pm website for meetings etc. The next meeting
is
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
Beer Foamy.
--
s'' Mark Fowler London.pm Bath.pm
http://www.twoshortplanks.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
';use Term'Cap;$t=Tgetent Term'Cap{};print$t-Tputs(cl);for$w(split/ +/
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Mark Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
Beer good.
Beer Foamy.
Only when you add bubble bath...
L.
A young, female, non-bearded, non-jumpered members of CAMRA? *shock*
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:09:16PM +0100, Lucy McWilliam wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just
From: Richard Clamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 01:15:17PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
Just saw this linked from a hugely obvious banner ad on the Register :
http://training.gbdirect.co.uk/courses/perl/for_the_register.html
Great idea to tie it in to a success story I
From: Lucy McWilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beer good.
But Guinness is better ;)
Barbie
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 04:41:56PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
In other news: Microsoft SQL Server sucking (SQueaL), Sun Ultra
Enterprise 1, google++, the Sony Clie being small and cute,
checking out pubs for the next meet, buffy, search.cpan.org being
hacked (Catalog module apparently),
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they don't just give it away or hoard it, y'know?
There
I spotted a bug in Tie::Hash::Rank, which would break the DELETE and EXISTS
methods. It's fixed in v 1.0.1 which is winging its way to CPAN as we speak.
Oops.
--
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/
Good advice is always certain to be ignored,
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:57:08PM +0100, Dave Thorn wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 03:59:54PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
Dave Thorn wrote:
that settles it, yes. everything's for sale, even pride.
London Pride?
obviously. they
It's all been pretty civilised over on the Cookwook board recently which has
made a nice change. I suspect it might all kick off again tho' when bk sees
my response to his contribution to this thread:
http://www.cookwood.com/cgi-bin/lcastro/perlbbs.pl?read=5205
Dave...
--
Drugs are just
I have managed to resist the temptation to join previous flame wars with bk
but I was feeling weak this time :(
Matt
--
s!msfQ!s$utvKs(Q)\1!sfiupoBs^reverse Ibdlfses^#
s$#!uojsqs(.)chr(ord($1)-1)ges(.*)reverse $1see
- Original Message -
From: Dave Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Go me! Tie::Hash::Transactional is written. It implements a hash which
you can checkpoint and rollback.
I'll put it on my website as soon as my victim^Wlovely volunteer tester
has had a chance to play with it.
It was disgustingly easy to write - took about an hour, most of which was
writing
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if they
said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we really want
to associate with the buggers?
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
said they designed it. But I'll agree with The Goth here, do we
Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 1:16:12 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
DC On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 10:55:17PM -0500, Mike Jarvis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Larry speaks in a bit over 9 hours. Yippee!
DC Actually - he doesn't :)
DC http://use.perl.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/12/2255236
It all worked out ok.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Barbie [easynet] wrote:
From: Robin Szemeti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Barbie wrote:
They probably could only get away with saying they maintain it due to
the
amount of complex stuff in there, and potential legal implications if
they
said they
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 07:44:11AM +0100, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Are there any of you lot still looking for jobs?
Still open? I think I might have someone for you.
I was fishing on behalf of a client who may well need a perl linux
person in the
30 matches
Mail list logo