On Wed, 30 May 2001 17:14:15 +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote:
RFC822 will allow all of the following (taken from CGI Programming with
Perl) and was designed to accept all the addresses in use in 1982:
Alfred Neuman Neuman@BBN-TENEXA
:sysmail@ Some-Group. Some-Org
Muhammed.(I am the greatest)
Andy Williams wrote:
Has any one used this module at all?
How does it match up against tchrist's stuff?
http://sunsite.lanet.lv/ftp/mirror/x2ftp/msdos/admtools/ckaddr
--
simon wistowwireless systems coder
i think, i said i think this is our fault.
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:
Andy Williams wrote:
Has any one used this module at all?
How does it match up against tchrist's stuff?
All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr:
user: andyw. is good
host:
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr:
user: andyw. is good
host: hillway.com is good
address `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is bad: rfc822 failure
So I guess [EMAIL
* Andy Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works wierd!
its not the email address thats broken, its your SMTP server ;-)
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:02:11AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
Has any one used this module at all?
I just tried it and got some wierd results!!!
It though the following where VALID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tricad@dial,pipex.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED],co.uk
enquiries@peter-il;land.co.uk
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Andy Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works wierd!
its not the email address thats broken, its your SMTP server ;-)
Could be right it's sendmail :(
Andy
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote:
* Andy Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works wierd!
its not the email address thats broken, its your SMTP server ;-)
This man is not guilty of manslaughter, he is only guilty
of being Arnold J. Rimmer. That is his crime... it is also
his punishment.
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew
Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Email::Valid
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:56:56AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
snip
You are correct in that these shouls all be invalid.
Great.
and that this was INVALID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is.
Damn
another snip
Thanks for the RFC... I think!
:)
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:56:56AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
snip
You are correct in that these shouls all be invalid.
Great.
and that this was INVALID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It
From: Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:45 PM
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote:
All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr:
user: andyw. is good
host:
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 05:14:15PM +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote:
[IsValidAddress sub, which was built from the RFC822 grammar...]
Unfortunately, a fair few mailers don't allow IP literals as valid
domain-parts anymore, due to abuse.
MBM
14 matches
Mail list logo