Re: Email::Valid

2001-06-01 Thread Peter Haworth
On Wed, 30 May 2001 17:14:15 +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote: RFC822 will allow all of the following (taken from CGI Programming with Perl) and was designed to accept all the addresses in use in 1982: Alfred Neuman Neuman@BBN-TENEXA :sysmail@ Some-Group. Some-Org Muhammed.(I am the greatest)

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Simon Wistow
Andy Williams wrote: Has any one used this module at all? How does it match up against tchrist's stuff? http://sunsite.lanet.lv/ftp/mirror/x2ftp/msdos/admtools/ckaddr -- simon wistowwireless systems coder i think, i said i think this is our fault.

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Andy Williams
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Simon Wistow wrote: Andy Williams wrote: Has any one used this module at all? How does it match up against tchrist's stuff? All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr! [EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr: user: andyw. is good host:

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr! [EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr: user: andyw. is good host: hillway.com is good address `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is bad: rfc822 failure So I guess [EMAIL

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Greg McCarroll
* Andy Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works wierd! its not the email address thats broken, its your SMTP server ;-) -- Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.uklinux.net

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:02:11AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: Has any one used this module at all? I just tried it and got some wierd results!!! It though the following where VALID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tricad@dial,pipex.com [EMAIL PROTECTED],co.uk enquiries@peter-il;land.co.uk

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Andy Williams
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: * Andy Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works wierd! its not the email address thats broken, its your SMTP server ;-) Could be right it's sendmail :( Andy

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2001, Greg McCarroll wrote: * Andy Williams ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works wierd! its not the email address thats broken, its your SMTP server ;-)

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Andy Williams
This man is not guilty of manslaughter, he is only guilty of being Arnold J. Rimmer. That is his crime... it is also his punishment. On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew

RE: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Scottow Adrian - adscot
Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Email::Valid On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr! [EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:56:56AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: snip You are correct in that these shouls all be invalid. Great. and that this was INVALID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is. Damn another snip Thanks for the RFC... I think! :)

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Andy Williams
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:56:56AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: On Wed, 30 May 2001, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: snip You are correct in that these shouls all be invalid. Great. and that this was INVALID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] It

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Matthew Robinson
From: Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 4:45 PM On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:40:03AM -0400, Andy Williams wrote: All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr! [EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr: user: andyw. is good host:

Re: Email::Valid

2001-05-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 05:14:15PM +0100, Matthew Robinson wrote: [IsValidAddress sub, which was built from the RFC822 grammar...] Unfortunately, a fair few mailers don't allow IP literals as valid domain-parts anymore, due to abuse. MBM