Re: JOB: Another one (Banking)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank. Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs? i've been inadvertently hacking on a web-based forum for this stuff for a little while... will talk about it a bit tonight, and happy to accept suggestions and offers of tweaks for it. nothing to see at the moment, though :/ jo
RE: JOB: Another one (Banking)
Simon Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 1:05 PM On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank. Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs? We're creating a london.pm jobs database. Jo will be talking about it tonight. Dave... -- The information contained in this communication is confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy of it from your computer system.
Re: JOB: Another one (Banking)
On 19/04/2001 at 13:04 +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank. Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs? There's a fairly long standing and, from what I remember, well respected habit of using JOB in the subject line- if it really annoys you, filtering on that should reduce the jobness of the list quite a lot. Of course, if anyone is doing this they'll be missing this thread too... -- :: paul :: how fickle fate can be
Re: JOB: Another one (Banking)
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:38:44PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote: There's a fairly long standing and, from what I remember, well respected habit of using JOB in the subject line- if it really annoys you, filtering on that should reduce the jobness of the list quite a lot. Ah, bingo. Thanks. Of course, if anyone is doing this they'll be missing this thread too... But if they're already doing it, they know about it, so it doesn't matter. -- Within a computer, natural language is unnatural.
Re: JOB: Another one (Banking)
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, jo walsh wrote: On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:53:09AM +0100, dcross - David Cross wrote: This is for people who don't have a problem working in a bank. Would it be worth forking london-pm-jobs? i've been inadvertently hacking on a web-based forum for this stuff for a little while... How can you inadvertently hack ? /J\
RE: JOB: Another one (Banking)
How can you inadvertently hack ? "I'll just quickly knock a little something together to do task X ... hmmm, actually, wouldn't it be cool if it could also do task Y, just for convenience sake ... hmm, that works, but I'm sure it could work stronger/faster/better than before ... " And so on until it's suddenly 5am and you're out of Red Bull. -- matt | credo
Re: JOB: Another one (Banking)
i've been inadvertently hacking on a web-based forum for this stuff for a little while... How can you inadvertently hack ? at a scattiness load as consistently high as mine has been lately, it's hard to do many things advertently consider yourself warned :) z
