On Mon, 21 May 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
From: Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 May 2001 13:28
Subject: Long shot
Anyone know a windows IMAP client that:
1. Isn't Netscape
2. Isn't Eudora
3. Actually Works
4. Is free or cheap
Define works?
I use
Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone know a windows IMAP client that:
1. Isn't Netscape
2. Isn't Eudora
3. Actually Works
4. Is free or cheap
Pc-Pine?
http://www.washington.edu/pine/pc-pine/
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:15:28PM +0100, Mike Wyer wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
From: Jonathan Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 May 2001 13:28
Subject: Long shot
Anyone know a windows IMAP client that:
1. Isn't Netscape
2. Isn't Eudora
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Paul Mison wrote:
On 21/05/2001 at 14:15 +0100, Mike Wyer wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Robert Shiels wrote:
I use Outlook Express, I like it a lot. It works for me.
Much badness. We are withdrawing Outlook and associates from all our
Windows
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone know a windows IMAP client that:
1. Isn't Netscape
2. Isn't Eudora
3. Actually Works
4. Is free or cheap
PC Pine.
/J\
Outlook express is evil.
It actually appears to work correctly for IMAP, and is reasonably fast,
but...
1. For some unknown reason it doesn't let you use mail filters on IMAP
messages, thereby rendering it completely unsuited to my needs
2. And this is the really evil one. If you use plain
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone know a windows IMAP client that:
1. Isn't Netscape
2. Isn't Eudora
3. Actually Works
4. Is free or cheap
Sigh...
Another vote for PC-Pine. When our University NFS + 'We support Outlook
Express, support for Pine is frozen' network
Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Netscape - works, can filter mail, poor interface, dreadfully slow
Hmm, I like Netscape's Interface - does everything I want it to, no
unessecarily wasted screen territory, excellent configuartion system.
The only thing that narks me off is the fact that, unlike the
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Anyone know a windows IMAP client that:
1. Isn't Netscape
2. Isn't Eudora
3. Actually Works
4. Is free or cheap
Mulberry? .. amongst others
http://www.ncsu.edu/imap/readers.html
http://www.imap.org/products/database.msql
thats a choice of
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
1. For some unknown reason it doesn't let you use mail filters on IMAP
messages, thereby rendering it completely unsuited to my needs
The Mac version does :)
But yeah, that's a pain.
2. And this is the really evil one. If
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 12:49:48PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
1. For some unknown reason it doesn't let you use mail filters on IMAP
messages, thereby rendering it completely unsuited to my needs
The Mac version does
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 09:50:07PM +0100, Martin Ling wrote:
...but lacks the ability to filter POP messages by headers before
downloading. Why the hell can't they get their act together on the same
bloody bit of software? And they accuse *us* of forking.
Not only that the Outlook and Outlook
12 matches
Mail list logo
