On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 05:39:54PM +, Leon Brocard wrote:
Jonathan Peterson sent the following bits through the ether:
The language Ruby looks really cool. Can anyone tell me:
It's very Perlish, but over-the-top OO-ish at the same time. The
interpreter just runs over the parse tree -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether:
Slightly OT, but does anyone think it would be possible to run
Perl/Ruby/Java bytecode directly on a Transmeta Crusoe chip? As I understand
it, you would only need to implement a VLIW translation layer or whatever
Yes, right. This
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
[1] which is why Java-JVM and Java-.NET CLR are hard and slow
... A living example of Artificial Intelligence
Hmmm, I obviously meant Perl instead of Java there. How bizarre.
Leon
--
Leon
Jonathan Peterson sent the following bits through the ether:
The language Ruby looks really cool. Can anyone tell me:
It's very Perlish, but over-the-top OO-ish at the same time. The
interpreter just runs over the parse tree - none of these fancy
bytecodes and stuff. I'm not convinced, but get
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:15:01PM -, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
Hey,
The language Ruby looks really cool. Can anyone tell me:
1. Why on earth you'd use Python instead of Ruby.
Because Python is a lot cleaner and more elegant? And doesn't require
all those daft nested "end"s? But I'm
In message BF7C70E24CF5D311B52F00B0D0215D411B13FE@IH_SERVER,
"Jonathan Peterson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey,
Dude.
The language Ruby looks really cool. Can anyone tell me:
It is really cool.
1. Why on earth you'd use Python instead of Ruby.
I wouldn't any more. The only reasons I
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:56:28PM +, Rob Partington wrote:
In message BF7C70E24CF5D311B52F00B0D0215D411B13FE@IH_SERVER,
"Jonathan Peterson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey,
Dude.
The language Ruby looks really cool. Can anyone tell me:
It is really cool.
1. Why on earth
