Re: test

2001-05-17 Thread Philip Newton
Greg McCarroll wrote: just a test Sorry, didn't arrive in Germany. You have some kind of UK only filter on these things? Please sent it again, with the filter turned off. Cheers, Philip (feeling testy) -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:57:08PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Merijn Broeren
Quoting Paul Makepeace ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): This is great, thanks! Is it possible to get it to do this *only* when the email is content-type: text/html; rather than displaying it instead of the text/plain in a multipart/alternative? Yeah, you set it up in .muttrc : auto_view text/html

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:37:54AM +0200, Merijn Broeren wrote: On the risk of offending the person who gets really tired of the w3m-is-better meme, I prefer w3m because I get send so many tables in html, they show up real nice. I found a problem with w3m (which I admittedly didn't look at

Re: Test

2001-04-06 Thread Mark Fowler
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Merijn Broeren wrote: # Else use lynx to view it as text text/html; lynx -dump %s; copiousoutput Quick question for us non mutt users that may one day consider using it. Does this run throgh the shell? And what's %s in this? I'm kinda hoping it's not able to be '; rm

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Simon Wistow
Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Feature request - IMAP client. Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a spare second. (Yeah, right.) There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :( -- Sendmail may be safely run set-user-id to root.

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Simon Wistow
Simon Cozens wrote: On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: There's also Mail::Cclient (by Malcolm Beattie) which can be tricky to install and the interface is a bit unfriendly That's the fault of the underlying Cclient library. :( Yeah, tell me about it. hence

Re: Test

2001-04-05 Thread Paul Makepeace
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. I'm not 100% sure of the security aspects, but it's still better than Lookout. ;-) [ ~/.mailcap

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Philip Newton
Clarke, Darren wrote: Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* I agree. Your mail server lost again. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] All opinions are my own, not my employer's. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Dominic Mitchell
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* Darren Newbie Loser You don't get away from a Newbie without learning though. Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Robin Houston
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. People with broken mail clients may disagree :-) .robin. -- select replace(a, CHR(88),

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Greg McCarroll
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. thats perfect as far as i'm concerned (mutt user) -- Greg McCarroll

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:42:31PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:25:50PM +0100, Clarke, Darren wrote: Sorry all - this is a test... :P Bloomin' Outlook HTML ... *grumble* It's coming through as multipart/alternative, which is fine IMO. People with broken mail

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Gareth Harper
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 2:41 PM Subject: Test from uuencode boy test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Snip

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Robin Szemeti
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, you wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. works for me .. theres stuff I dont need, but since it identifies whats what in the headers I can read it fine in

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Robin Houston
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? :-) .robin. (reads london-pm with the 'D' key) -- Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas!

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:15:21PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following bits through the ether: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Okay, you have a

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Merijn Broeren
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Your message looks like this : I 1 no description [multipa/alternativ,

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Struan Donald
* at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks? doesn't eveyone archive all their mail? *some*

Re: Test from uuencode boy

2001-04-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test. can you read this one, or is it attached? This is in Microsoft Outlook Rich Text. The previous mails have been sent in Plain Text. Sort of - pine seems to prefer the disclaimer over the body of the message as an alternative part but I have

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Struan Donald wrote: * at 04/04 15:58 +0100 Robin Houston said: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume my disk space at 4 times the rate. You mean you *archive* this bollocks?

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Simon Cozens wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:30:53PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote: However, it's more all these *** job agencies sending me things in multi-crap that I'm shifting home over a modem to read at home. scp -C is good at making things smaller, but

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread Simon Cozens
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:19:15PM +0100, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: Feature request - IMAP client. Mail::IMAPClient exists, so I guess it's a real possibility. When I get a spare second. (Yeah, right.) -- We *have* dirty minds. This is not news. - Kake Pugh

Re: Test

2001-04-04 Thread David Cantrell
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:40:03PM +0100, Dominic Mitchell wrote: Anyway, tip-o-the-day for mutt users. How to get HTML viewed easily and automatically. Don't bother. If it was worth saying, it was worth saying properly. -- David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |