Re: Web site

[Dave Cross]

At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:41:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> >At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>  Dave
> >>
> >>  I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website 
> >>  still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update 
> >>  perhaps?
> >
> >Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me.
> 
> I've been looking at london.pm.org which is still showing the tech 
> meeting on the 18th on the front page.
>
> Is that the right url ?

Yep. That's right. Everything else is not to be trusted.

Dave...

Re: Web site

[Dave Cross]

At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 16:20:36 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>  Dave
> >>
> >>  I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website 
> >>  still lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update 
> >>  perhaps?
> >
> > Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me.
> 
> The front page on Penderel (currently down I beleive) has a little 
> calendar, list PO as the venue.
> 
> Or was I getting cached pages?

Ah. OK. You shouldn't trust anything on penderel as that was just a 
snapshot copy of the main site  that I did as
an experiment a while ago. The _real_ site had some major updates
recently.

Perhaps we could get something set up that mirrors london.pm.org to
penderel? Jo? Alex?

Dave...

Re: Web site

[Simon_Wilcox]

>At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  Dave
>>
>>  I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still
>>  lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps?
>
>Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me.
>
>Dave..




I've been looking at london.pm.org which is still showing the tech meeting on
the 18th on the front page.


Is that the right url ?


Simon.












__


   This document should only be read by those persons to whom it is addressed
   and is not intended to be relied upon by any person without subsequent
   written confirmation of its contents. Accordingly, our company disclaim all
   responsibility and accept no liability (including in negligence) for the
   consequences for any person acting, or refraining from acting, on such
   information prior to the receipt by those persons of subsequent written
   confirmation.

   If you have received this E-mail message in error, please notify us
   immediately by telephone. Please also destroy and delete the message from
   your computer.

   Any form of reproduction, dissemination, copying, disclosure, modification,
   distribution and/or publication of this E-mail message is strictly
   prohibited.

Re: Web site

[Neil Ford]

>At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  Dave
>>
>>  I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still
>>  lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps?
>
>Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me.
>
>Dave..

The front page on Penderel (currently down I beleive) has a little 
calendar, list PO as the venue.

Or was I getting cached pages?

Neil.
-- 
Neil C. Ford
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.binky.ourshack.org

Re: Web site

[Dave Cross]

At Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:36:28 +, Neil Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave
> 
> I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still 
> lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps?

Which page did you have in mind? It all looks up to date to me.

Dave..

Re: Web site

[David Cantrell]

On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 03:36:28PM +, Neil Ford wrote:

> I know you've probably got load on at the mo, but the website still 
> lists the February meeting as being at the PO. An update perhaps?

http://dave.told.us.to is correct though :-)

-- 
David Cantrell | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/

  This is nice.  Any idea what body-part it is?