On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:22:44PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
FYI, this domain is about to expire. So if anyone wants it, snag it.
I was going to transfer it to bulkregister (my preferred registrar)
but simply couldn't be arsed.
It's a cute domain. I haven't seen a domain expire and go to
- Original Message -
From: Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 4:04 AM
Subject: Re: perlismybitch.com
Yeah, I don't know why that is. There are even 'domain watching'
services where you can be notified when the record finally
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:34:19AM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
It's a cute domain. I haven't seen a domain expire and go to back to
available in a reasonable period for quite a while, though; they're kept
on as expired records for $bignum amount of time. :-)
Yeah, I don't know why that is. There
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dominic Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, due to the slovenly fashion in which most places
(coughNetwork Solutions/cough) seem to update their whois databases
this stands a good chance of being too slow against somebody else
registering it.
I
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:14:02PM -0500, will wrote:
An old boss of mine wanted a domain that was expiring in a few weeks once so
he ran a cron task that checked the status of the domain every hour and
automatically registered it when it became available.
That's how we got kitsite.com,
on 25/4/01 5:25 pm, Paul Makepeace wrote:
If you read
the small print they threaten to disconnect service if whois info isn't
accurate. Pity you have to supply perfect info for spammers.
I think that's fair, like accepting mail to postmaster@, hostmaster@,
webmaster@ etc. It's not like email
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Chris Heathcote wrote:
on 25/4/01 5:25 pm, Paul Makepeace wrote:
If you read
the small print they threaten to disconnect service if whois info isn't
accurate. Pity you have to supply perfect info for spammers.
I think that's fair, like
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, you wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:51:59PM +0100, Chris Heathcote wrote:
on 25/4/01 5:25 pm, Paul Makepeace wrote:
If you read
the small print they threaten to disconnect service if whois info isn't
accurate. Pity you have to supply perfect info for
