I have just uploaded v1.1.1 of Tie::Scalar::Decay which fixes a minor bug
in v1.1.
It was actually a bug in the test suite :-) which was assuming that the
machine running the tests was a RTOS (or at least capable of responding
in near real-time). Therefore, the final test, which gave sub-second
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:41:51PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
Didn't Tony from Blackstar do this already?
Yes, but a) he never released it on CPAN
At the time I was under a contract which didn't let me do this...
I should really upload some stuff now ...
Tony
--
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:00:54PM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Cool Uses For Technology #497: Hmm, triggered on first access would
be interesting too. That way you could put an object wrapper around
the sinking platforms in Manic Miner.
but, to be *really* evil ...
Use Tie::Array::blah to
... is on its way to CPAN. If you're desperate for it, you can also snarf
it from http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/tech/Tie-Scalar-Decay-1.0.tar.gz.
It was inspired by Marcel's Tie::Scalar::Timeout. By default, it simulates
radioactive decay with a fairly arbitrary half-life of five seconds
* David Cantrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
... is on its way to CPAN. If you're desperate for it, you can also snarf
it from http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david/tech/Tie-Scalar-Decay-1.0.tar.gz.
It was inspired by Marcel's Tie::Scalar::Timeout. By default, it simulates
radioactive decay
/Tie-Scalar-Decay-1.0.tar.gz.
shurely Tie::Array::Decay would be better
Didn't Tony from Blackstar do this already?
Yes, but he didn't upload it to CPAN: it's on the belfast.pm site.
--
Marty
PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 03:51:21PM +0100, Rob Partington wrote:
Didn't Tony from Blackstar do this already?
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:33:40 +
From: Tony Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFC: Tie::Scalar::Timeout
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:41:51PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
Whilst I thought that a radioactive-style decay was a suitable default,
for the app I wrote it for, a simple decrement every time period was
more appropriate.
Cool Uses For Technology #497: Hmm, triggered on first access would
be
