Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-17 Thread Simon Cozens
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:54:56PM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote: it no longer kills dia This appears not to be the case, as of dia 0.86. -- I did write and prove correct a 20-line program in January, but I made the mistake of testing it on our VAX and it had an error, which two weeks of

Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-16 Thread Aaron Trevena
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, David Cantrell wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish. A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault. HEY!

re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread Aaron Trevena
the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller, is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/ it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats - it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my head. :) A. -- A HREF =

Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread Simon Wistow
Aaron Trevena wrote: the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller, is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/ From the FAQ (http://droogs.org/autodial/FAQ) Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish. A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is automatically deferred to

Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread David Cantrell
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:03:59PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote: Q: Why is AutoDIAL so rubbish. A: Because Trelane told me to 'just release it' although blame is automatically deferred to Muttley because everything is his fault. HEY! Actually I think it was me who told him to "release early,

Re: re-release of autodial

2001-04-12 Thread Jonathan Stowe
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Aaron Trevena wrote: the new version of autodial - codenamed DiaKiller, is available at http://droogs.org/autodial/ it no longer kills dia, in fact it works quite well with a few caveats - it is much easier to test with Dia, rather than parsing the xml in my head.