On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 20:16, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 10:42:57AM +, Andy Wardley wrote:
I'm a little surprised by that. Although I must admit that I've never
written IIS extensions in C++, I'm surprised that it offers significantly
better performance than a
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 00:02, Shevek wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 10:42:57AM +, Andy Wardley wrote:
I'm a little surprised by that. Although I must admit that I've never
written IIS extensions in C++, I'm surprised that it offers
On 11 Feb 2003, Dirk Koopman wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 00:02, Shevek wrote:
AICI, the current Perl interpreter is written traditionally whereas the
Parrot assembler interpreter is written to allow direct threaded
interpretation. This should reduce the bytecode overhead, but doesn't
Title: Network Intrusion Detection (Third Edition)
Authors:Stephen Notthcutt Judy Novak
ISBN: 0-7357-1265-4
Publisher: New Riders
Firstly let me state that this is undoubtedly one of the greatest books on
TCP/IP and Intrusion Detection that I have ever read, although
Shevek wrote:
I won't recommend a date module, other people will. Look on CPAN at
search.cpan.org. Search for Date.
Or Time. Goodness, I can't wait for DateTime to be sorted out :-).
Date::Parse is really friendly and will automatically parse most dates the
way you want to without any effort
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:16:53PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Programmer cluefulness being equal, when did interpreted, profiled
languages start even slightly approaching the speed of compiled,
profiled languages like C(++)?
So, in short, if we assume some things which aren't true, then we
On 11 Feb 2003, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Yes, maybe, but show me one of these systems that _consistantly_
produces faster code than someone who is talented. I willingly agree
that the code is physically produced faster - but it don't go as well.
And this is the nub of it. Basically there aren't
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 11:42, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Simon Wilcox wrote:
Fantastic, I'll take that. It will also be cheaper, so I get my product to
market quicker *and* I make a bigger margin on it. Cool.
Sorry, I'm a painter and decorator, not Michelangelo.
If you want elegance, go to a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:10:44AM +, Ben wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 08:16:53PM +, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Programmer cluefulness being equal, when did interpreted, profiled
languages start even slightly approaching the speed of compiled,
profiled languages like C(++)?
So,
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:54, Shevek wrote:
On 11 Feb 2003, Dirk Koopman wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 00:02, Shevek wrote:
AICI, the current Perl interpreter is written traditionally whereas the
Parrot assembler interpreter is written to allow direct threaded
interpretation.
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
--
Dave Hodgkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you both very much, Mr. Fowler and Mr. Shevek.
The use of a third-party module raises a new problem: there is any way to
automate the installation of pre-requisite libraries on a system? I wanna
end up with a script that the operator just runs before publishing the new
scripts on the
Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
I have had success with Thawte[0] in the past. If you need to get them on the
phone it is pretty easy. Unfortunatly they are owned by Verisign I think.
Will.
[0] http://www.thawte.com/
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:52:50AM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
Do you know any friendly OpenSRS registrars?
http://resellers.tucows.com/opensrs/certificates/
--
Lusercop.net - LARTing Lusers everywhere since 2002
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:59:16AM +, nemesis wrote:
Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
I have had success with Thawte[0] in the past. If you need to get them on
the phone it is pretty easy. Unfortunatly they are owned by Verisign I
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:52:50AM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
http://www.instantssl.com/
P
--
Paul Makepeace ... http://paulm.com/
If you ever go temporarily insane, then carefully
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
maybe try - http://geotrust.com ?
--
Nigel Hamilton
Turbo10 Metasearch Engine
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+44 (0) 207 987 5460
fax:+44 (0) 207 987 5468
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:04, Lusercop wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:52:50AM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
Do you know any friendly OpenSRS registrars?
http://resellers.tucows.com/opensrs/certificates/
I don't know. Do
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Luis Campos de Carvalho wrote:
The use of a third-party module raises a new problem: there is any way to
automate the installation of pre-requisite libraries on a system?
CPANPLUS is what you want.
http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/03/26/cpanplus.html
The bit you want
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:49:25AM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
And just maybe I might retrain as one seeing some of the salaries / fees
plumbers are getting these days...
To say nothing of all the kinky sex.
Ben
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 11:52, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
we just renewed with Thawte as they seem to be not too expensive, and it
works on almost everything.
There are much cheaper options (right down to 50 quid .. maybe less)
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:28, Ben wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:49:25AM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
And just maybe I might retrain as one seeing some of the salaries / fees
plumbers are getting these days...
To say nothing of all the kinky sex.
Oo... Really? I missed that bit. Are
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to delurk for such a trivial matter but could the people from Scunthorpe or
those working for Microsoft please move, I keep getting This message has been
impounded for improper language content message from my network nazis and they're
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:18:31PM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:04, Lusercop wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:52:50AM +, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
What's the cheapest way of doing a reasonably pukka SSL site cert?
Do you know any friendly OpenSRS registrars?
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:35, Dirk Koopman wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:28, Ben wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:49:25AM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
And just maybe I might retrain as one seeing some of the salaries / fees
plumbers are getting these days...
To say nothing of all
Lawyers - never use one word when ten will suffice.
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The
I suggest people read this paper by Brother Kernighan:
http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/bwk/interps/pap.html
(IIRC there's something similar in The Practice of Programming too)
Which shows that for certain tasks, perl is as fast as *or faster than* C.
Although it does use rather old
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to delurk
Hello.
for such a trivial matter but could the people from Scunthorpe or those
working for Microsoft please move, I keep getting This message has been
impounded for improper language content message from my network nazis
and
Hi folks,
I'm wondering about how to put a perl based website on a CD Rom
This seems to be worth researching
http://www.indigostar.com/microweb.htm
MicroWeb allows you to create a working web site on a CD-ROM. Using a web
browser, a user can run CGI programs as well as view html files on the
Andy Wardley wrote:
I'm a little surprised by that. Although I must admit that I've never
written IIS extensions in C++, I'm surprised that it offers significantly
better performance than a mod_perl solution.
Paul Makepeace wrote:
Programmer cluefulness being equal, when did interpreted,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Mark Fowler wrote:
May I suggest if your email account has arbitrary restrictions on the
content it accepts that you find a replacement account to subscribe from?
I beleive that for appropriate donations, you can even get an account on a
machine very closely located to the
the hatter wrote:
I beleive that for appropriate donations, you can even get an
account on a machine very closely located to the list itself.
Though this is of limited usefulness in several corporate environments that
limit connections to useful ports such as 22, 23, or 110.
As in our lovely
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS sorry for the disclaimer below ( apparently we've won awards for it ).
Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com
This message contains SNIPP
umm is there some particular reason that whoever is responsible for adding
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Alex == Alex McLintock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex And best of all - if you don't need MySQL then it is free. (Apparently
Alex you can't distribute MySQL as part of a commercial product.without
Alex paying for a license)
First, I don't think that's true any
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:04:29PM +, nemesis wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Second, why anyone still uses MySQL on a new installation now that
PostgreSQL has surpassed it and gone on to being a baby Oracle,
while MySQL plays catch up, I can't figure out.
I heard/read somewhere
cuts
umm is there some particular reason that whoever is
responsible for adding
that massage couldn't see fit to add a proper content
seperator (/^--\s\n/)
as defined in the RFC's ??
cuts
Massage seperator ? is that like when the Old Bill raid the joint then ?
Here comes that disclaimer
Given the lack of speed difference, PG is infinitely preferable to My,
at least in my little world.
That's what I thought, so I set about installing Pg the other day. Four
hours later I'd changed by mind :-(.
Maybe I'm just getting old but I find installing large software packages
gets
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:44:24PM +, robin szemeti wrote:
umm is there some particular reason that whoever is responsible for adding
that massage couldn't see fit to add a proper content seperator (/^--\s\n/)
as defined in the RFC's ??
Which RFC is the -- (not /^--\s/) defined in? I
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Philip wrote:
the hatter wrote:
I beleive that for appropriate donations, you can even get an
account on a machine very closely located to the list itself.
Though this is of limited usefulness in several corporate environments that
limit connections to
I think I'm having a brain fart but I'm sure there was a module that
took a string with accented characters and turned them into the
equivalent ASCII (or close enough egrave; to 'e' for example. I'm not
all that fussed about an EssSet to 'ss' or anything although that would
be nice.
AM I smoking
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 15:30, Lusercop wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:44:24PM +, robin szemeti wrote:
umm is there some particular reason that whoever is responsible for
adding that massage couldn't see fit to add a proper content seperator
(/^--\s\n/) as defined in the RFC's ??
Simon Wistow wrote:
I think I'm having a brain fart but I'm sure there was a module that
took a string with accented characters and turned them into the
equivalent ASCII (or close enough egrave; to 'e' for example. I'm not
all that fussed about an EssSet to 'ss' or anything although that would
be
Simon Wistow wrote:
I think I'm having a brain fart but I'm sure there was a module that
took a string with accented characters and turned them into the
equivalent ASCII (or close enough egrave; to 'e' for example. I'm not
all that fussed about an EssSet to 'ss' or anything although that would
be
Shevek wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Philip wrote:
As in our lovely firewall which doesn't allow *any* outside
access except by proxy (which basically reduces it to HTTP
and HTTPS).
Can you cheat via an https proxy?
Well, since you can't proxy HTTPS, you can, kind of -- once
robin szemeti wrote:
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 15:30, Lusercop wrote:
Which RFC is the -- (not /^--\s/) defined in?
to be precise, it is defined as \n-- \n
I always thought it was a USEFOR thing, and therefore not
on the standards track. I suppose it could be in the
Nettiquette
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Peter == Peter Pimley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter ... he says, writing on his QWERTY keyboard
http://www.independent.org/tii/news/liebowitz_economist.html
(Precis: the fable of the QWERTY keyboard - that it was designed to slow
typists DOWN, and yet has
Simon Wistow wrote:
I think I'm having a brain fart but I'm sure there was a module that
took a string with accented characters and turned them into the
equivalent ASCII (or close enough egrave; to 'e' for example. I'm not
all that fussed about an EssSet to 'ss' or anything although
that
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 17:04, Tim Sweetman wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Peter == Peter Pimley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter ... he says, writing on his QWERTY keyboard
http://www.independent.org/tii/news/liebowitz_economist.html
(Precis: the fable of the QWERTY keyboard -
On Tue 11 Feb, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Hrm, perl doesn't use UTF-8 for it's internal representation of strings ?
I may be misremembering things somewhat. The cloudy things I remember
are that the version of perl shipped with RH8 uses a slightly geb0rken
16 bit implementation (who is the guy
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:50, Roger Horne wrote:
On Tue 11 Feb, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Hrm, perl doesn't use UTF-8 for it's internal representation of strings ?
I may be misremembering things somewhat. The cloudy things I remember
are that the version of perl shipped with RH8 uses a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:11:31AM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
http://www.independent.org/tii/news/liebowitz_economist.html
I personally know several Dvorak typists and they're all without fail
blindingly fast typists (90wpm) and crucially their accuracy is good. I
can push around 75wpm if
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 04:10:20PM +, Shevek wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Philip wrote:
As in our lovely firewall which doesn't allow *any* outside access except by
proxy (which basically reduces it to HTTP and HTTPS).
Can you cheat via an https proxy?
https proxy? yay for
Ben == Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben It used to be. MySQL was so fast historically, because it wasn't
Ben really a database (Real Programmers Don't Need Referential
Ben Integrity and all that nonsense) but rather an SQL interface to a
Ben flat file. When the MySQL people started to realise
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 17:54, Dirk Koopman wrote:
On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 16:50, Roger Horne wrote:
On Tue 11 Feb, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Hrm, perl doesn't use UTF-8 for it's internal representation of
strings ?
I may be misremembering things somewhat. The cloudy things I
yOn Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Paul Makepeace wrote:
I personally know several Dvorak typists and they're all without fail
blindingly fast typists (90wpm) and crucially their accuracy is good.
Donald Norman's _Psychology of Everyday Things_ has a section on the whole
tired qwerty / dvorak debate,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 05:54:14PM +, Dirk Koopman wrote:
Methinks there is much smelly fish in Perl 5.8.0 UTF implementation and
Well, UTF8 is a variable length encoding, so many O(1) things become O(N)
I think that's most of the smelly fish.
also in RH8.0's internationalisation stuff /
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:15:57PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cuts
umm is there some particular reason that whoever is
responsible for adding
that massage couldn't see fit to add a proper content
seperator (/^--\s\n/)
as defined in the RFC's ??
cuts
Massage seperator ? is that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
However, it only allows CONNECT to a remote port of 443.
(Which is why I'm looking for someone nice who'll run an sshd on port 443
that he'll let me use.
I happen to know of a machine that has a whole IP address kept free just
so that we can put sshd on any port we
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:56:01PM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Given the feedback on suggestions about perl debugger tutorials, I
don't think many perl *users* use the debugger, so to me that explains why
no-one in the world noticed it sooner. To most perl users, the debugger is
not
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:28:14PM +, the hatter wrote:
They might allow other 'common' web ports, such as 8000 and 8080 on other
servers, maybe give that a go. If they do, you can run your own sshd on
any machine you happen to have non-root access.
If they allow packets straight out to
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:14:42PM -, Andrew Beattie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
However, it only allows CONNECT to a remote port of 443.
(Which is why I'm looking for someone nice who'll run an sshd on port 443
that he'll let me use.
I don't recall seeing the parent message to
Peter == Peter Pimley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter ... he says, writing on his QWERTY keyboard
http://www.independent.org/tii/news/liebowitz_economist.html
Peter looking at his CRT monitor
Nope, haven't owned a CRT in 5 years or so
Peter connected to a CISC machine (I'm guessing here)
62 matches
Mail list logo
