On 8 May 2013, at 17:09, Peter Corlett wrote:
The real problem is browser support of Gopher. None of the common
popular
browsers support it any more.
Clearly they are not fit for purpose then! ;-)
G.
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
[...]
> The mention of the new-fangled IRC thing made me wonder if anyone has been
> perverse enough to create a link-shortener that serves things via gopher, or
> some other quirky protocol.
> Although I can see an immediate flaw in t
Anyone still using this? Assuming you have credentials from
before they shut it off.
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:56:33PM +0100, Dominic Humphries wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 13:01 +0100, Sam Kington wrote:
> > Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
> > converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in
> > tweets, and they ob
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 13:01 +0100, Sam Kington wrote:
> Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
> converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in tweets,
> and they obfuscate the URL you're linking to. Is link-tracking really that
> useful?
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 02:32:24PM +0100, Sam Kington wrote:
> On 8 May 2013, at 14:21, Jérôme Étévé wrote:
> > If you generate QR Codes, shortened links are actually very useful.
> "If you stab yourself in the face repeatedly with a rusty knife, bandages
> that automatically inject you with a te
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:01:53PM +0100, Sam Kington wrote:
> Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
> converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in tweets,
> and they obfuscate the URL you're linking to. Is link-tracking really that
>
On 8 May 2013, at 14:21, Jérôme Étévé wrote:
> On 8 May 2013 13:48, Ben Evans wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sam Kington wrote:
>>> Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
>>> converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in
>>> twe
On 8 May 2013 13:48, Ben Evans wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sam Kington wrote:
>
> >
> > Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
> > converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in
> > tweets, and they obfuscate the URL you're li
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Sam Kington wrote:
>
> Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
> converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in
> tweets, and they obfuscate the URL you're linking to. Is link-tracking
> really that useful?
On 08/05/2013, at 10:01 PM, Sam Kington wrote:
> On 8 May 2013, at 11:07, Kieren Diment wrote:
>> On 08/05/2013, at 7:37 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
>> Quoting AJ Dhaliwal :
> Dave...
> [Who is seriously considering replacing fkth.is with fkth.at]
Too late. I have purchased fkth.at
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:01:53PM +0100, Sam Kington wrote:
[...]
> Getting off-topic here, but what use are URL shorteners now that Twitter
> converts all links to be t.co/blah ? They don't save you any space in tweets,
> and they obfuscate the URL you're linking to. Is link-tracking really that
On 8 May 2013, at 11:07, Kieren Diment wrote:
> On 08/05/2013, at 7:37 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
> Quoting AJ Dhaliwal :
Dave...
[Who is seriously considering replacing fkth.is with fkth.at]
>>>
>>> Too late. I have purchased fkth.at and will sell it to you for 1 million
>>> dollars.
>>
>
Quoting Kieren Diment :
On 08/05/2013, at 7:37 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
Quoting AJ Dhaliwal :
Dave...
[Who is seriously considering replacing fkth.is with fkth.at]
Too late. I have purchased fkth.at and will sell it to you for 1
million dollars.
First rule of domains: never mention in publ
for us outer suburban dwellers, it looks like fkthcity.net is still available.
On 08/05/2013, at 8:04 PM, Will Crawford wrote:
> On 8 May 2013 10:37, Dave Cross wrote:
>
>> http://whois.net/whois/fkth.at
>>
>
> changed:20130508 11:14:29
>
> I
On 08/05/2013, at 7:37 PM, Dave Cross wrote:
> Quoting AJ Dhaliwal :
>
>>> Dave...
>>> [Who is seriously considering replacing fkth.is with fkth.at]
>>>
>> Too late. I have purchased fkth.at and will sell it to you for 1 million
>> dollars.
>
> First rule of domains: never mention in public a
On 8 May 2013 10:37, Dave Cross wrote:
> http://whois.net/whois/fkth.at
>
changed: 20130508 11:14:29
Is their clock fast, or is that Icelandic time?
Quoting AJ Dhaliwal :
Dave...
[Who is seriously considering replacing fkth.is with fkth.at]
Too late. I have purchased fkth.at and will sell it to you for 1
million dollars.
First rule of domains: never mention in public a domain you might be
interested in, without buying it first.
ht
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Dave Cross wrote:
> The IP address 2001:1850:1:0:107:0:0:d of nameserver fns1.dnspark.net is
> missing its PTR record or has an incorrect PTR record.
$ host 2001:1850:1:0:107:0:0:d
Host d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.0.1.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.0.0.5.8.1.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa
not fo
On 08/05/13 17:06, Dave Cross wrote:
ISNIC is the Icelandic domain registrar. They deal with the .is ccTLD.
They have slightly non-standard requirements for the DNS of .is
domains. See http://www.isnic.is/en/domain/req for details.
I usually host my DNS using Gandi. But they aren't on ISNIC's
ISNIC is the Icelandic domain registrar. They deal with the .is ccTLD.
They have slightly non-standard requirements for the DNS of .is
domains. See http://www.isnic.is/en/domain/req for details.
I usually host my DNS using Gandi. But they aren't on ISNIC's list of
approved DNS suppliers, so
21 matches
Mail list logo
