Tom Hukins writes:
> CPAN Testers ... the database also benefits from lots of people
> running tests on lots of different systems. It's worth considering
> whether you want to run it on your development system or a build
> machine: it's not just for high volume automated smokers.
Or, if you're a
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 03:08:40PM +0100, Dominic Thoreau wrote:
> Because people will insist on using these OSes, and it's worth at least
> trying to make sure your code works in as many environments as practical.
> Which is why CPANTS exists
I hope this comes across as informative rather tha
On 11 August 2014 07:37, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> > "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
>
> Toby> *throws hands in air* I'm not trying to defend the concept! you'd
> have
> Toby> to ask the Debian developers what they were thinking.
>
> Part of why I steer far clear from Linux. Why use a "
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:37:35PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Why use a "pretend" Unix when
> you can use a real one?
Because more stuff Just Works. HTH.
--
David Cantrell | semi-evolved ape-thing
Planckton: n, the smallest possible living thing
On 11 August 2014 03:56, Toby Wintermute wrote:
> Hi,
> I took over Test::PostgreSQL a while back.
> I still get a lot of test failures from OpenBSD and FreeBSD users on
> CPANTS, and I think it's simply down to the postgres binaries being
> installed in different locations.
>
> If you run either
On 11 August 2014 07:37, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
>
> Toby> *throws hands in air* I'm not trying to defend the concept! you'd have
> Toby> to ask the Debian developers what they were thinking.
>
> Part of why I steer far clear from Linux. Why use a "pret
> "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
Toby> *throws hands in air* I'm not trying to defend the concept! you'd have
Toby> to ask the Debian developers what they were thinking.
Part of why I steer far clear from Linux. Why use a "pretend" Unix when
you can use a real one?
--
Randal L. Schwart
On 11 August 2014 16:21, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
>
>>> Why the heck would people put "bin" stuff under a *lib* directory?
>>> That's just... insane.
>
> Toby> Well, you can have multiple versions installed at once that way. Then
> Toby> /usr/bin/ contain
On 11 August 2014 15:48, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>> "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
>
> Toby> I still get a lot of test failures from OpenBSD and FreeBSD users on
> Toby> CPANTS, and I think it's simply down to the postgres binaries being
> Toby> installed in different locations.
>
> Toby
> "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
>> Why the heck would people put "bin" stuff under a *lib* directory?
>> That's just... insane.
Toby> Well, you can have multiple versions installed at once that way. Then
Toby> /usr/bin/ contains scripts that pass control to the appropriate
Toby> version
> "Toby" == Toby Wintermute writes:
Toby> I still get a lot of test failures from OpenBSD and FreeBSD users on
Toby> CPANTS, and I think it's simply down to the postgres binaries being
Toby> installed in different locations.
Toby> If you run either of those systems, would you be able to tell
Hi,
I took over Test::PostgreSQL a while back.
I still get a lot of test failures from OpenBSD and FreeBSD users on
CPANTS, and I think it's simply down to the postgres binaries being
installed in different locations.
If you run either of those systems, would you be able to tell me the
path to the
12 matches
Mail list logo
