On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:02:25PM +0100, Bob MacCallum wrote:
Good question - I have always hacked something with fork in the past but it
just seemed so simple with Thread::Queue and threads. I've never needed
much IPC in the past.
Parallel::ForkManager has some (evil, hacky*) support for
On 30 Jul 2013, at 14:54, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:02:25PM +0100, Bob MacCallum wrote:
Good question - I have always hacked something with fork in the past but it
just seemed so simple with Thread::Queue and threads. I've never needed
much IPC
On 30/07/2013 20:38, DAVID HODGKINSON wrote:
On 30 Jul 2013, at 14:54, David Cantrell da...@cantrell.org.uk wrote:
Parallel::ForkManager has some (evil, hacky*) support for returning data
from a forked child to the parent.
And I've used it. Works fine.
So have I, to work around an
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:07:59 +0100
From: Bob MacCallum uncool...@gmail.com
Subject: isolating thread-unsafe modules
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers london.pm@london.pm.org
Message-ID:
cafliikdbkm62+wr79hyrs8h-ser0e+qgivj1nahx48stky0...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type
2013 20:07:59 +0100
From: Bob MacCallum uncool...@gmail.com
Subject: isolating thread-unsafe modules
To: London.pm Perl M[ou]ngers london.pm@london.pm.org
Message-ID:
cafliikdbkm62+wr79hyrs8h-ser0e+qgivj1nahx48stky0...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sorry for the Perl question, but I'm a bit out of my depth...
I have a Dancer app providing a web service, and I have another script
using the same Dancer config file and db schema (e.g. use Dancer
qw/:script/). This script watches the database (for changes made by the
web app) and does the
Threads? Now you have two problems. Why not processes?
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Jul 2013, at 20:07, Bob MacCallum uncool...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the Perl question, but I'm a bit out of my depth...
I have a Dancer app providing a web service, and I have another script
using the same
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think, I know, I'll use
threads, and then two they hav erpoblesms
On 28 July 2013 21:13:52 Dave Hodgkinson daveh...@gmail.com wrote:
Threads? Now you have two problems. Why not processes?
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Jul 2013, at 20:07, Bob
Good question - I have always hacked something with fork in the past but it
just seemed so simple with Thread::Queue and threads. I've never needed
much IPC in the past.
It looks like this could be a better option:
Parallel::ForkManager seems to do the trick.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Bob MacCallum uncool...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question - I have always hacked something with fork in the past but
it just seemed so simple with Thread::Queue and threads. I've never needed
much IPC in the past.
10 matches
Mail list logo
