G. Matthew Rice ha scritto:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:48 PM, ross brunson r...@brunson.org wrote:
I like some light RE's and focusing on the variations of grep can be a
marvelous way to intro someone to RE's without hardcore shovel work,
somehow it's more understandable when you can easily
I read that among the Objectives the following terms are among those
considered of prime importance concerning the 1.1.3 objective: GPL, BSD,
Creative Commons, Free Software, Open Software, FOSS, FLOSS. Would
throwing in a little of UNIX and Free UNIX OSes history be too much?
I understand it's
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Dimitrios Bogiatzoules t...@lpi.org wrote:
Do note that I'm all in favour of increasing awareness of public-key
encryption (and, in particular, the problems with it) within the general user
community. However, I do not think this makes sense in the context of an
Martijn Brekhof wrote:
What is the difference between a user, and a teenage school kid or
undergraduate student?
School kids and undergraduates are a captive audience that can be tortured ;^)
Seriously, the stuff in the introductory objectives is nice and important but
office/web/email-type
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Martijn Brekhof m.brek...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. However, the following is not clear to me.
Hence, don't think »sysadmins vs. users«, think »teenage school kid or
undergraduate student«, presumably with a background in using non-Linux
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Anselm Lingnau
anselm.lingnau+exam...@linupfront.de wrote:
I still remember the push back when I included GnuPG in the LPIC-1
objectives. Even LPIC-1 doesn't have the key publishing/ring and key
revocations that it should. Maybe next update :)
Wait, what?
