Eden Caldas wrote: > I find it perfect.
Personally, I would like to see the »capacity planning« stuff nailed down in more detail before it is added to LPIC-2. As it is, it is a huge can of worms that nobody really wants to touch. (I presume that the performance monitoring bits of LPI-301, which are a bit more concrete, are subsumed in the move.) Also do consider that LDAP as it relates to Samba4 has little to do with OpenLDAP, since Samba4 comes with its own LDAP implementation. Since Microsoft's LDAP in Active Directory, and hence Samba4's LDAP, is incompatible in various ways with what the rest of the world (including OpenLDAP) knows as LDAP, requiring OpenLDAP because it will be useful for Samba4 makes no sense. As far as changes to LPIC-2 are concerned, I would recommend against adding every web server but the kitchen sink to the 208 objective. We did that with MTAs and it turned out to be a singularly silly idea. We can test every conceptual aspect of running a web server with reference to Apache because it is so general; from that POV the differences between Apache and nginx, lighttp etc. mostly amount to configuration file syntax. I could see myself agreeing to requiring awareness that the others exist and why one might want to use one of them, but let's keep their configuration out of the exam completely. Anselm -- Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen anselm.ling...@linupfront.de, +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
