Hi Xiaohu,
The IGP drafts define MSD as a framework that enable advertisements for various
type of SID limits – starting with the Base MSD Type – 1. You are referring to
this generic construct of MSD in the text you quote below. It is, however, the
Base MSD (type 1) which is aligned with the
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your clarification. IMHO, no matter the MSD information is provided
by whatever protocol, the semantics of the MSD itself should be unified in the
IETF community. Otherwise, it would introduce unnecessary confusion to
implementors and operators.
It said in the OSPF-MSD
Hi Jeff,
Before we propose the NMP idea, we carefully compared it with the existing
NETCONF, gRPC and YANG models work:
1. Based on my experience in the YANG model work, it may be not satisfactory
for these models does not define config/oper of all features of specific
protocol and these models
Hi Acee,
It is not described clearly in the draft that reusing BMP is also a possible
option for monitoring IGP. We will refine the draft.
Expect to have more discussion with you in IETF 102.
Thanks,
Robin
-Original Message-
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com]
Sent:
