Alvaro -
Thanx for the review.
We will work on addressing the comments.
In regards to the relationship with RFC 7794, there is a history here.
The N and R flags were originally defined as part of the prefix-sid sub-TLV in
early versions of this draft. However, it was realized that there were
Thanks Alvaro for the review!
Authors - please give these comments the highest priority.
Thanks,
Acee
On 3/20/19, 6:21 PM, "Alvaro Retana" wrote:
Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing this document. Please take a look at the in-line
comments below. In general, I think
Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing this document. Please take a look at the in-line
comments below. In general, I think that some more work is needed. I will
wait for that before starting the IETF Last Call.
There is a significant issue that I want to highlight here (there are also
Support this draft.
Thanks,
Sridhar
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, 7:30 AM Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> This begins a 3 WG last call for the subject document. The extra week is
> since the IETF is next week. Please enter your support or objection to the
> document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday,
Support (as co-author).
Paul
On 3/19/19 9:30 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
This begins a 3 WG last call for the subject document. The extra week
is since the IETF is next week. Please enter your support or objection
to the document before 12:00 AM (EDT) on Wednesday, April 3^rd , 2019.
Hi Acee,
I'm not aware of any relevant IPR.
Regards,
Paul
On 3/19/19 9:17 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Les, Paul,
In preparation for WG last call, I’d like to ask one more time if you
know of any IPR associated with this draft?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with
