Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: (with COMMENT)

Barry - Thanx for the review. Response inline. > -Original Message- > From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:30 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > ; Uma Chunduri ; > aretana.i...@gmail.com;

[Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman - Thanx for the review. Responses inline. > -Original Message- > From: Lsr On Behalf Of Roman Danyliw via > Datatracker > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 12:18 PM > To: The IESG > Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensi...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps > ; uma.chund...@huawei.com;

[Lsr] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-24: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

Hi Acee, As a contributor, I am not aware of any IPR. dan From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 10:42 AM To: Stefano Previdi , "Paul Wells (pauwells)" , "Voyer, Daniel" , "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" , "satoru.matsush...@g.softbank.co.jp" , "bart.peir...@proximus.com" ,

[Lsr] Enhancements on flooding topology encoding

Hi Tony, Two enhancements for the flooding topology encoding using Path TLVs, and another flooding topology encoding using Block TLVs are described below for discussions. In one current encoding, Path TLVs are used to encode the flooding topology. A Path TLV represents a path on the

Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

Hi Acee, As a contributor, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR for this draft. Thanks, Ketan From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 09 May 2019 20:12 To: Stefano Previdi ; Paul Wells (pauwells) ; daniel.vo...@bell.ca; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) ; satoru.matsush...@g.softbank.co.jp;

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Negotiation bit

Hi Tony, There are two different cases in which a link is to be added to the FT temporarily. In one case, a negotiation is needed to be done before a link is to be added to the FT temporarily. In the other case, no negotiation is needed. It is determined that a link is added to the FT

Re: [Lsr] Flooding Negotiation bit

Hi Gyan, The dynamic flooding extensions are all new work and they would be optional enabled. We would appreciate your input and especially on applicability to your existing deployed networks. Thanks, Acee From: Lsr on behalf of Gyan Mishra Date: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 at 9:57 PM To: Tony Li

Re: [Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" - draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-05.txt

Support. -- Thanks, Yingzhen From:Lizhenbin To:Acee Lindem (acee) ;lsr@ietf.org Date:2019-05-13 20:00:32 Subject:[Lsr] 答复: Working Group Adoption Call for "IS-IS Extensions to Support Routing over IPv6 Dataplane" -