Hi Chris,
We made this change in -41.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/8/19, 6:14 AM, "Christian Hopps" wrote:
should have read "or it supports more than 32"
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> This strikes me as one of these artificial limits that gains us almost
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol
Authors : Stephane Litkowski
Derek Yeung
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the excellent review - see one inline.
On 10/8/19, 6:13 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote:
Hi Stephane,
Thanks for pulling in the fixes; just a few notes inline (and trimming)...
On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 10:33:49AM +0200, slitkows.i...@gmail.com wrote:
>
should have read "or it supports more than 32"
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> This strikes me as one of these artificial limits that gains us almost
> nothing (what if the platform supports less than 32 or it supports 32?), and
> creates these backward incompatible
This strikes me as one of these artificial limits that gains us almost nothing
(what if the platform supports less than 32 or it supports 32?), and creates
these backward incompatible YANG issues (ranges that have to change) that are
part of what is driving the complexity in the YANG versioning
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for your comment.
Please find some inline answers.
I'm doing the changes as part of the -41.
Stephane
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Sent: mercredi 2 octobre 2019 03:17
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-...@ietf.org; Yingzhen Qu
