Hi, Robert:
There are situations that we want to distinguish the passive interfaces from
the normal interfaces. I will try to write one draft in recent days to describe
it and for further discussion.
Thanks in advance.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Jan 7, 2020, at 18:14, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Hi Aijun,
Right .. I took your email as an attempt/request to actually advertise
passive links in the first place.
May we know what difference does it make to you if reachable prefix is part
of an active vs passive interface from IGP point of view ?
Thx,
R.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 2:08 AM
Thanks Chris. We've just posted the WG version of this draft that was adopted.
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: 06 January 2020 23:49
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps ;
draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr]
Thanks Chris. We've just posted the WG version of this draft that was adopted.
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
Sent: 06 January 2020 23:51
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-reverse-met...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; Christian
Hopps
Subject: Re: [Lsr]
