FYI…
Because I am one of the co-authors of draft-chen-isis-ttz, I am recusing
myself from this discussion. Martin will be the responsible AD for it,
should one be needed.
Alvaro.
On January 27, 2020 at 1:27:13 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) (a...@cisco.com)
wrote:
Speaking as WG Co-chair:
At IETF 1
Speaking as WG Co-chair:
At IETF 107, we had a protracted discussion of several drafts having goal of
reducing the amount of link-state information that must be flooded into the
level-2 area. We have two drafts that do this essentially via abstraction of
the level-1 areas. These are:
https://
Speaking as WG Co-chair:
At IETF 107, we had a protracted discussion of several drafts having goal of
reducing the amount of link-state information that must be flooded into the
level-2 area. We have two drafts that do this essentially via abstraction of
the level-1 areas. These are:
https://
Hi Bruno,
please see inline (##PP):
On 24/01/2020 16:24, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Hi authors, WG,
I've re-read the draft. Please find below some minor comments and nits.
Best regards,
--Bruno
Minors:
==
" A node indicates that it has support for SRv6 by advertising a new
SRv6
Support.
Thanks,
Shunwan
From:Christian Hopps mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>
To:lsr mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Cc:lsr-ads mailto:lsr-...@ietf.org>>;Christian Hopps
mailto:cho...@chopps.org>>;Acee Lindem (acee)
mailto:a...@cisco.com>>
Date:2020-01-22 08:15:24
Subject:[Lsr] WG Last Call draft-ietf-lsr-is
